Clinton Skeletons still Dancing

Posted on April 21, 2014April 21, 2014 by Denise Simon

In the last month, many Clinton administration documents are being released which is required by law. To date we have seen documents as they relate to enemies lists, how to stage and rebuke scandals all of which lead to the just how they think and their hidden missions.

Just this week included in the most recent round of documents we find that Bill Clinton wrote a personal note to the Dar al Hijrah mosque in Falls Church, Virginia asking to work together in proposed suggestions from the mosque. After 9/11, the FBI visited this mosque and at least two of the hijackers on that terrible day worshipped there. Additionally, Mohammed al Hanooti was the Iman at the mosque for four years and he was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

Of particular note, Anwar al Awlaki was also an Iman there as well. al Awlaki was killed in a drone attack in Yemen. al Awlaki was a U.S. citizen who Major Nidal Hassan of Ft. Hood shooter fame communicated with and al Awlaki was also a major contributor to the Inspire magazine, the al Qaeda publication that advances the jihad doctrine around the world.

After the decision to kill Awlaki by drone, Barack Obama and his staff has sought to keep classified the document trail regarding Awlaki, but a judge ruled today those documents are to be released.

The Clinton’s have a long history of being on the wrong side with particular emphasis placed on campaign money, aborting operations to kill Usama bin Ladin and approving pardons for corrupt placeholders, criminals, bombers and jihadis.

Well in case you are seeking additional proof on the Clintons and need something more on Hillary as she seeks to win the Democrat nominee to be president in 2016, we cannot overlook her complicity in Benghazi but here is the movie titles ‘Hillary’ so you can revisit this lying and corrupt elite couple. This movie was banned from normal theater distribution using the work and names of those like Harry Reid.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mYW5nmS9ps&feature=player_embedded

Oh yeah, one more thing, remember Sandy Berger, you know the guy who stole documents from the National Archives? Well those documents were over the aborted mission to kill Usama bin Ladin, Sudan and the Millennium Plot. The FBI file is here.

We don’t want a co-presidency in the White House again, and frankly this pair should have their citizenship revoked.

Brandeis Bans Free Speech

Posted on April 10, 2014April 10, 2014 by Denise Simon

On the Brandeis University website it states the school is the only nonsectarian Jewish sponsored university in the country. The school was named for Louis Dembitz Brandeis, a Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Then there is a sentence on the website that refers to the school has innovative and exciting programs of learning that emphasizes an interdisciplinary approach to knowledge and the solutions of real-life problems.

Heh, well when it comes to the schools decision to uninvited Ayaan Hirshi Ali for an honorary degree, it flies in the face of the very text above and especially that of what any Supreme Court Justice should encourage.

In a deeper look one of the notable alumni of the school is Michael Ratner, class of ’65. He is the President Emeritus of the Center for Constitutional Rights. Sounds like a great guy eh? Well not so much, this organization he runs is at the core of the outside constant assistance of the existing AG of the Department of Justice, Eric Holder and additionally that organization is the lead agency full of lawyers providing free counsel to Guantanamo detainees.

And this very week, the school terminated its invitation to Ayann Hirshi Ali under major pressure from CAIR, whose membership has a nasty history.

When radical speech comes from Muslims, however, the same voices claiming to defend the world against hate speech suddenly turn into spin doctors. Among the examples:

Sami Al-Arian remains a hero in Islamist circles despite being exposed as a board member for the Palestinian Islamic Jihad and being taped saying Jews were “made into monkeys and pigs” by Allah and calling for “Death to Israel.”

CAIR represented Imam Kifah Mustapha in failed litigation against the Illinois State Police. The agency dropped Mustapha as its first Muslim chaplain after the Investigative Project on Terrorism reported about his work as a paid fundraiser for a Hamas front, including performances “singing about Jihad and martyrdom” in a singing troupe which performed at fundraisers.
CAIR lauded University of California, Irvine students charged with misdemeanors for orchestrating a series of disruptions aimed at silencing a 2010 speech by Israeli Ambassador Michael Oren. CAIR’s Los Angeles director called the students, whose stated goal was to silence someone else’s speech, “true American heroes.”
CAIR has defended Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader Yusuf al-Qaradawi as a moderate despite his fatwas justifying suicide bombings in Israel and attacks on American soldiers in Iraq. CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad joined Qaradawi in 2012 to discuss a film project about the Muslim prophet Muhammad. This meeting occurred after Qaradawi expressed a wish to kill Jews before he dies.
When a radical Muslim website threatened the producers of “South Park” in 2010, CAIR’s national spokesman dismissed the significance, wondering in the Los Angeles Times if “they were set up only to make Muslims look bad.”

CAIR works diligently to block free speech across America as well as free thought. Brandeis stated it’s reason for shunning Ayaan Hirsi Ali is due in part that her criticisms were inconsistent with Brandeis Universitiy’s core values. Well, do those core values include shutting down free speech? Did anyone at the University bother too research the history of CAIR, their relationship to Hamas and documented relationships with unindicted co-conspirators from the Holyland Foundation trial?

It was only recently too that CAIR forced capitulation of the University of Michigan and the Greater Oakland County Republican Club.

Read more here. My good friends at the Investigative Project continue to do yeoman’s work with proven facts and documents.

Too often, claims of “Islamophobia” are parroted without challenge by the news media. None of the reports this week pressed Hirsi Ali’s critics about the context of her statements or about the overall tenor of their attacks. None pointed out that internal documents discovered during an investigation into a Muslim Brotherhood support network place CAIR on the group’s “Palestine Committee.” The committee was tasked with helping Hamas politically and financially.

Until that situation changes, the Islamist winning streak of bullying others into silencing their foes is likely to continue.

Come America, unless we admit what CAIR is and what Islam and Sharia is doing to the entire culture and history of our country, then we are going to have a crisis all too soon that will begin to look like Great Britain and sadly, Syria.

Dempsey there but not John Kerry (Israel)

Posted on April 2, 2014April 2, 2014 by Denise Simon

Well, people, the matter of Israel at the core of two epic issues remains, the matter of a peace agreement with the Palestinians and the matter of negotiations on Iran’s nuclear program. So, while Barack Obama has capitulated with Iran with wide spread news and failures, Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs is in Israel gaining an assessment on Israel’s war plans with Iran.

ABOARD A GOVERNMENT AIRCRAFT — Israel and the United States are now in broad agreement about the threat that Iran poses to the region and how to deal with it, the top US military official said Tuesday.

“I think they are satisfied that we have the capability to use a military option if the Iranians choose to stray off the diplomatic path,” Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said of Israeli officials. “I think they are satisfied we have the capability. I think they believe we will use it.”

Acknowledging there were differences in the past, Dempsey said Israel and the United States are closer now in their assessment of the threat Iran poses and America’s willingness to act.

Dempsey made the remarks after wrapping up a two-day visit to Israel, where he met with military and government officials.

The international community has reached an agreement with Iran to lessen sanctions against the country in return for curbing its nuclear program.

In the past, Israeli officials have expressed wariness about the international accord with Iran and also disagreed with the United States at times over the pace at which Iran could field a nuclear weapon. Israel had raised the prospect of a unilateral attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities.

“Our clocks are more harmonized than they were two years ago,” Dempsey said.

“They just wanted to know that we are maintaining and continuing to refine our military options,” he said.

Jim Michaels writes for USA Today.

Then the matter of John Kerry and his broken talks with Abbas, Kerry bailed out.

JERUSALEM, Jan. 13 (UPI) — U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry called off his Monday visit to Israel at the last minute, Israeli broadcaster Arutz Sheva reported.

The cancellation is apparently in reaction to poor results in Kerry’s attempt to broker an agreement between Israel and the Palestinian Authority, the broadcaster said.

The next stages of the diplomatic negotiations were expected to be finalized at Monday’s meeting.

Currently, Israel hasn’t responded to Kerry’s suggested security arrangements in the Jordan Valley that would replace the presence of Israeli troops.

The Palestinian Authority objects to Israel’s demand that Israel be recognized as the state of the Jewish people. It also refuses to give up on the so-called “right of return” for displaced Arabs and their descendants to Israel.

Oh yeah, one more thing, the issue of releasing Jonathan Pollard just to keep the talks moving forward, well that is for the most part off too. Pollard does not want to be released just to save John Kerry and the White House….I don’t blame him.

Who Refused to Release Jonathon Pollard?

Posted on March 31, 2014April 1, 2014 by Denise Simon

Update (4-1-2014)

In an effort to continue talks between Israel and the Palestinians, Israel has demanded for years the release of Pollard. There is some chatter now that his freedom could come within two weeks. It should be noted that the United States has released and returned many spies to their home country over the years.

A file is here for your review on the Pollard case.

Currently, John Kerry is working both sides of the fence in the matter of peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians. Kerry forced Israel to release prisoners with very nasty and deadly histories while Abbas has not given up anything. It should be noted here perhaps that the Palestinian Liberation Organization was in fact an invention of the Russian KGB of which Abbas, its current leader has a deep history in Russia.

Now, one matter that Israel has asked for since the Clinton administration is the release of Jonathon Pollard now serving a life sentence for providing covert technical documents to the Israelis, of course our long-term ally in the Middle East. George Tenet advised Clinton not to release Pollard and even today, with the White House and John Kerry working against Israel on a number of major issues, the Obama administration still refuses the call by Israel to the United States to release Pollard.

November, 1998

C.I.A. CHIEF VOWED TO QUIT IF CLINTON FREED ISRAELI SPY

During the Middle East peace talks last month in Maryland, the Director of Central Intelligence told President Clinton he would resign if Mr. Clinton agreed to release the spy Jonathan Jay Pollard, according to several Administration officials.

The Director, George Tenet, who was directly involved in the peace negotiations, made his warning to President Clinton after learning that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel had made Mr. Pollard’s case a key bargaining point, officials said.

In the end Mr. Clinton turned down Mr. Netanyahu’s request, agreeing only to review the matter once again, and the dispute did not prevent the negotiators from reaching a peace agreement.

Mr. Tenet refused to comment on the matter today, as did a spokesman for the Central Intelligence Agency.

Mr. Tenet’s threat to resign was a direct reflection of the depth of anger against Mr. Pollard that lingers among American intelligence and law enforcement officials 13 years after the former Naval intelligence analyst was arrested for passing top secret documents to Israel. He is now serving a life term.

A White House spokesman, David C. Leavy, refused to comment on whether Mr. Tenet threatened to resign over Pollard. But he did say, ”At no time did the President make a decision to release Mr. Pollard.”

During the conference, at Wye, Md., Mr. Clinton had been ”impressed by the force of Mr. Netanyahu’s arguments” on the Pollard matter, Mr. Leavy said.

The President then went back to consult with his advisers, including Mr. Tenet and his national security adviser, Samuel R. Berger, and eventually decided that he could not agree to Mr. Netanyahu’s demand, Mr. Leavy added.

During the conference, at Wye, Md., Mr. Clinton had been ”impressed by the force of Mr. Netanyahu’s arguments” on the Pollard matter, Mr. Leavy said.

Mr. Clinton agreed only to review the case again, for the third time in five years. United States intelligence and law enforcement circles insist that the American spy should never be given his freedom, and dismiss the fact that he acted on behalf of a friendly nation. But the far right in Israel has made Mr. Pollard’s release a celebrated cause — and Mr. Netanyahu has raised it with the President virtually every time they have met.

During the recent talks, Mr. Netanyahu told Mr. Clinton that he needed Mr. Pollard’s release in order to win over the right wing of his coalition to the peace agreement, according to senior American officials. Mr. Clinton was open to consideration of what Mr. Netanyahu and the Palestinian leader Yasir Arafat said they needed to help sell the peace agreement to their constituencies, these officials said. The President had been considering Mr. Pollard’s release, these officials said, when Mr. Tenet spoke up. ”It was clearly on the table,” said one American official.

Officials say Mr. Tenet believed that he would lose his credibility with his rank-and-file in the intelligence community if he were to agree to Mr. Pollard’s release from his life sentence.

”He knew that he was closely associated with these peace talks — it wasn’t like he was back at headquarters — and he couldn’t distance himself from this decision,” said one American official.

Mr. Tenet’s resignation would have forced Mr. Clinton to find his fourth C.I.A. director in less than six years — making the post one of the most difficult and intractable personnel problems that has faced his Administration.

Twice Mr. Clinton has had to stand by and watch as his nominees have been forced to withdraw before being confirmed by the Senate, and twice the President has had to find alternate candidates.

Mr. Tenet, 45, who was appointed Director of Central Intelligence in 1997 after former national security adviser, Anthony Lake, withdrew his nomination during partisan Senate confirmation hearings, had pledged to remain in the job for at least four years in order to provide the agency with some stability.

Since arriving at the C.I.A.’s Langley, Va. headquarters in 1995, first as the C.I.A.’s deputy director, Mr. Tenet has worked to revive the morale of agency employees and to provide a new focus after the cold war while winning increased financing from Congress.

The Pollard case was one issue on which it was impossible for Mr. Tenet to straddle both his political and intelligence constituencies.

In fact, as soon as word leaked out that Mr. Pollard’s freedom was a bargaining chip in the Middle East talks, American law enforcement and intelligence officials went into nearly open rebellion, complaining that the President should not release someone who had committed a massive betrayal of the national security. Accepting a Pollard deal with Mr. Netanyahu would have forced Mr. Tenet to side with the White House against his own lieutenants.

”If Pollard had been released, George would have had no choice but to resign,” said one senior Congressional official involved in intelligence matters.

The anger within the intelligence community was fueled by the fact that, during the 18 months he spied for Israel in 1984 and 1985, Mr. Pollard stole more top secret documents than almost any other spy in American history.

”He stole huge amounts of intelligence, measured in cubic yards, much of it was code word,” said R. James Woolsey, former Director of Central Intelligence, who recommended that Mr. Pollard be denied clemency when his case was first reviewed by President Clinton in 1993.

He took thousands of pages of the Government’s most sensitive intelligence, including many concerning Soviet weapons-system designs that came from Russian spies recruited by the C.I.A., as well as codes and large caches of information from American spy satellites and listening posts.

Arab opponents of Israel used Russian weapons, making the information of great interest to Israel.

He betrayed some of America’s most advanced espionage technology, and handed over so many documents that his Israeli handlers had to equip a secure Washington apartment with a high-speed photocopier and photographic equipment to absorb it all.

Israel has refused to return those documents ever since, and United States intelligence officials say the lack of Israeli cooperation has made it impossible for American investigators to resolve one of the most sensitive questions raised by the Pollard case — whether any of the thousands of pages of top-secret documents he passed on might somehow have ended up in the hands of America’s enemies, including the Soviet Union.

Such an outcome would have given the enemies knowledge of what American intelligence had learned, and perhaps how.

Photos: George Tenet’s resignation would have forced the President to find his fourth C.I.A. director. (pg. A1); Jonathan Pollard during an interview earlier this year. (Associated Press)(pg. A12)

Benghazi Bosa Nova

Posted on March 9, 2013March 9, 2013 by Denise Simon

Sadly, this current administration has worked diligently to obscure and impede the truth on the murders of four Americans in Bemnghazi. Security Environment Threat Lists (SETL) published by the State Department twice a year provides for a clear condition of areas around the world and Libya with particular emphasis on Benghazi was a true hot zone yet no offensive action was taken with regard to elevating security. In an effort to provide additional known facts on Benghazi as the media refuses to do so, below is an update of known facts.

1. All survivors of the Benghazi terror attack that required medical treatment and or still do are in treatment facilities that include Walter Reid or other locations under alias names.
2. After the Brits closed their presence in Benghazi where their SAS forces and Ml6 personnel were/are part of activities in Libya, continued to perform operations in joint efforts with the U.S. The Brits also left with for safekeeping their fast response weapons and gear at the CIA safehouse. The Brits, the French and the U.S. had long been providing lethal and non-lethal equipment to the Libyan rebels as well as on the ground training and conflict assistance. The laser systems used to point to targets for identification from the air assets were UK issued laser systems and not that of what the U.S. issues.
3. The mission post in Benghazi notified per procedure and protocol all officials of an imminent threat/attack even the day of the attack.
4. The interagency including the CIA ‘press-office’ were responsible for altering all the talking points that were used by the administration on the ‘why’ the attack occurred including who coordinated the attack and the reason for it.
5. Six months after the attack, still no subpoena has been issued for and to any of the survivors of the attack nor has any been issued to James Clapper. The ‘sitrep’ reports required by those with knowledge of the Benghazi attack have not been released. Interviews to this date have not been performed by agencies of the Red Cross, the Brits or other organizations that had a footprint or relationship in Libya to gain historical knowledge of anti-West militia activities. Government contractors hired by the State Department and the personnel on site working for or at the behest of the CIA have not been interviewed.
6. There has been no published summary of those that participated in the attack by the FBI or other investigating agencies as they related to Ansar al Sharia or those background connections of the membership of connected AQ militias.
7. Interviews have not been conducted with Libyan leadership by our investigating agencies.
8. Live feed videos of 9-11 in Benghazi summaries have not been made available nor have associated communications that include emails, text messages, or critical action alert exchanges.
9. No summary has been provided on the origination of the weapons, theft or smuggling that were part of Qaddafi’s arsenal or that of what the U.S. or contractors provided including State Department authorized weapons contractors including Turi Defense Systems.
10. Moktar Belmoktar of AQIM had phone call exchanges with those participating in the Benghazi attack. Belmoktar has allegedly been killed in the last week. This phone exchange is important as it points directly to al Qaeda and the immediate identification of those responsible for the attack.
11. It remains below radar that the contractors hired by the State Department that include Blue Mountain hired the February 17 Martyr Brigade to tend security at the compound. Not only were background checks not perform, but the contracts were no bullet contracts. Due to the pay scale and working conditions, many if not most of the February 17 Martyr Brigade were on strike the day of the attack.
12. USAID personnel were also working out of the mission post, the quantity of staff is unknown and to date, no one from USAID has been interviewed.
13. The State Department from the outset also lied with regard to hiring outside contract firms for security at the mission post in Benghazi, saying none had been hired.

14. Little to nothing is said with regard to the two U.S. destroyers off the coast of Tripoli at the time of the attack as this is especially important as it relates to connected communications during the night and day of the attack.