Obama/Kerry: Diplomatic Terrorism on Israel

Israel was on the edge at least last October, they knew that Obama and Kerry had something in the pipeline against Israel. So it comes down to who wins the debate over Jerusalem? Should there even be a debate and Israel is fighting back on the never-ending use of the words ‘occupy’ and ‘settlement’s and should.

 CBS

Bloomberg: When Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was re-elected last year, the White House threatened to reconsider long-standing U.S. policy to veto U.N. Security Council resolutions on Israel’s presence in the West Bank. At issue was a last-minute interview in which Netanyahu said there would be no Palestinian state as long as he was prime minister. He took back that statement after the election. Nonetheless, the White House directed policymakers to draw up a set of options for how Obama could “preserve the two-state solution,” according to one U.S. official privy to the process.

So far, nothing has come of Obama’s threat. Indeed last month, Obama signed an agreement with Israel to extend the U.S. subsidy of its military for another ten years. In foreign policy, Obama is focused on the collapse of U.S. policy in Syria, which has become an even greater humanitarian emergency in the last month with the Russian and Iranian-led siege of Aleppo. Politically, the White House is working to elect Hillary Clinton as Obama’s successor.

Yet with a little more than three months left of his presidency, Israeli officials privately say they worry Obama intends to try to level the playing field between the Palestinians and Israelis before he leaves office. The threat of a last-minute speech, executive order, or U.N. action has stirred some of Israel’s friends in Washington. Last month, for example, 88 senators signed a letter to Obama urging him to restate “long-standing U.S. policy” to veto one-sided anti-Israel resolutions at the U.N.

The Obama administration has not made such a statement. This week, however, White House spokesman Joshua Earnest “strongly condemned” Israel’s approval of 98 new housing units in the West Bank settlement of Shilo. A CBS correspondent noted that this phrasing is “usually reserved” for terrorist attacks.  More here.

**** So Israel put some assets into the system and worked to determine who, what and when such actions would happen. Since the UN vote, Israel says it has iron clad evidence of the United States complicity in the text for the vote.

****

Haaretz: he Egyptians distributed a Security Council resolution on the settlements last week, and demanded a vote within 24 hours, only to withdraw it after pressure from the prime minister’s bureau in Jerusalem and U.S. President-elect Donald Trump.

Israel’s UN ambassador, Ron Dermer, said Monday that Israel had evidence that the Obama administration was behind the wording of the resolution and had cooperated with the Palestinians behind Israel’s back. The document published on the Egyptian new site might be the evidence Israel has. On December 22, the day the original Security Council vote was to have taken place, the Israeli news site Walla published a report almost identical to the one on the Egyptian news site. Walla quoted a senior Israeli official as stating that in a meeting between Kerry and a Palestinian delegation to Washington headed by Palestinian Liberation Organization Secretary General Saeb Erekat, agreement was reached on the matter of a resolution against the settlements, and that Kerry said the United States would not veto it. More here.

****

What else was Israel watching?

On December 23, 2016, the UN General Assembly approved spending $138,700 to create a “database” of all companies that conduct business – directly or indirectly – relating to Israeli “settlements” in Arab-claimed territories. The idea of a boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) blacklist came from a March 2016 resolution of the UN Human Rights Council. According to UN documentation, the $138,700 will be used “to pay for one staff member to create the database over a period of 8 months and present a report” to the Human Rights Council in March 2017. In other words, the December authorization backdated approval of an expenditure for an operation already underway.

When the General Assembly’s Budget Committee met to approve the UN budget, Israel proposed to delete approval specifically for funding the blacklist.The Committee rejected the Israeli amendment 6 in favor (Australia, Canada, Guatemala Israel, Palau and the United States), 151 against, with 6 abstentions (Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Central African Republic, Georgia, Honduras and Ghana).

After Israel lost the vote on funding the BDS item, it declared it was “disassociating” from the General Assembly’s subsequent approval of the UN budget as a whole. Despite the U.S. voting against funding the blacklist initially, it voted in favor of the UN budget, and made no mention of any problem funding BDS.

Date
December 23, 2016
Title
Fifth Committee Vote on Israeli Proposed Oral Amendment to Resolution on Programme Budget Appropriations for 2016-2017 Biennium, UN Meeting Coverage
Note
Israel’s oral amendment was rejected by a vote of 6 in favor (Australia, Canada, Guatemala Israel, Palau and the United States), 151 against, with 6 abstentions (Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Central African Republic, Georgia, Honduras and Ghana)

So, here is Kerry on 12/28/2016 speaking while Obama is on vacation in Hawaii:

AP: Secretary of State John Kerry says that if Israel rejects a two-state solution for peace with the Palestinian people, “it can be Jewish or it can be democratic.”

Kerry was responding to withering Israeli criticism of the United States’ abstention from a vote condemning Israeli settlement construction. He reiterated the American position that a two-state solution giving both Israelis and Palestinians a home state is the best roadmap to peace. He also made it clear that despite recent differences in policy, the United States continues to be Israel’s closest ally.

Israel has been furious at the United States since the UN vote late last week. But Kerry said in a farewell speech at the State Department on Wednesday that the vote was “in keeping with” American values for democracy.

****

The full text of his speech is here, but while he ways that Israel has to be either Jewish or a democracy and not both, Kerry also suggests that Israel pay restitution to the Palestinians. In 2009, the United States gave Gaza $900 million, which is under the control of Abu Mazen.

 

More here.

Obama’s Position is Jews Cannot Pray at Wailing Wall

How about the first item of order in this decades long debate is eliminating 2 words: ‘occupation’ and ‘settlement’. Beyond that, read on.

Threats to Israel Posed by Resolution 2334

  1. In terms of Israel, the approach underlying Resolution 2334, whereby “the Western Wall is tantamount to the Yitzhar settlement,” or “the Ramot neighborhood in Jerusalem is equivalent to the settlement of Elon Moreh,” eliminates any chances of negotiations toward a two-state arrangement.
  2. The resolution rewards Palestinian obduracy, the Palestinian strategy of avoiding negotiations with Israel, and the expectation that the international arena will dictate the parameters for the arrangement. Therefore, the resolution will encourage the Palestinians to adhere to their refusal to return to the negotiating table and exhibit the flexibility required in any genuine negotiation.
  3. The resolution increased the risk of Israelis at certain political and military echelons being brought to trial before the International Criminal Court in The Hague. It will be difficult to conduct peace negotiations in an atmosphere of “a legal witch hunt” of Israeli leaders and commanders.
  4. The delegitimization movement and the boycott of Israel will become stronger and receive moral and political encouragement, which can be translated into legal, political, public, and economic measures.
  5. The resolution places the Israeli issue as a bone of contention between American Democrats and Republicans and threatens America’s longstanding bipartisan support of Israel.
  6. The resolution damages Israeli deterrence, since a significant portion thereof is based on the strategic alliance with the United States and its support of Israel.
  7. The report on issues referred to in the resolution, which the UN Secretary-General is requested to release every three months, will guarantee constant preoccupation with these topics at the expense of more important issues and will nourish an ongoing anti-Israeli campaign.

At the same time, Resolution 2334 was not passed pursuant to Chapter 7 of the United Nations Charter, and, therefore does not allow the UN to impose sanctions and other practical measures against Israel without a further resolution. One can assess that the new administration in the United States, which is more sympathetic toward Israel than the Obama administration, will veto any attempt to pass resolutions pursuant to Chapter 7.

****

CR: Here we go again with the U.N. peddling the biggest geo-political hoax of all time — that Israel’s control over Judea and Samaria is illegal, that it belongs to a distinct Arab people called “Palestinians,” and that the source of Islamist mayhem across the globe is a smattering of Jewish homes being built in their ancestral land. Land, which by the way, is virtually invisible on a map compared to the mass of land controlled by Islam.

While Islamic jihadists are blowing up every corner of the world, what is “the international community” focused on? Yup, those pesky little Jewish homes built in their ancestral home on a parcel of land not even visible on the map. The U.N. Security Council passed a resolution before the Christmas weekend that “reaffirms that the establishment by Israel of settlements in the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, has no legal validity and constitutes a flagrant violation under international law.”

Obama instructed the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations to abstain from vetoing that resolution, an unprecedented step given our history of vetoing anti-Israel resolutions. Worse, it appears that Obama was likely the ringleader behind the resolution because, according to Israeli sources, Vice President Joe Biden convinced Ukraine to support the resolution, a move that shocked Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu.

Actually, Israeli sovereignty over Judea and Samaria is enshrined into international law

The notion that there is any moral equivalence between Jews building homes in their homeland that they won back in a defensive war (after it was illegally occupied by Jordan) and brutal terrorists illegally occupying land that was never given to them, is reprehensible. But first, a brief history lesson …

The only binding resolution of international law, a resolution which has never been countermanded to this very day, is the July 1922 Mandate for Palestine. Adopted by the League of Nations, that resolution recognized the “historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country.” It called for the creation of a Jewish national homeland anywhere west of the Jordan River.

Once the League of Nations was disbanded and the United Nations formed in its stead, the international community agreed to maintain all agreements and not “alter in any manner the rights whatsoever of any states or any peoples or the terms of existing international instruments to which Members of the United Nations may respectively be parties.” [Article 80, UN Charter, emphasis added] This provision wasn’t inserted by accident; it was known as “the Jewish People’s clause” at the time it was adopted in 1945 in order to enshrine the 1922 Mandate into international law.

The Mandate for Palestine adopted by the League of Nations was the last legally binding document delineating regional borders. In Article 5 of the Mandate it explicitly states “The Mandatory shall be responsible for seeing that no Palestine territory shall be ceded or leased to, or in any way placed under the control of the Government of any foreign Power.”

The Palestine Mandate (and Iraq) was given to Britain to serve as a temporary trustee based on the resolution between the four principle Allied Powers in April 1920 at the San Remo Conference in Italy, which was signed by 51 nations. It was at that conference where the world powers adopted the 1917 Balfour Declaration (which originally allocated the eastern part of the Mandate for a Jewish state as well) creating a Jewish state. This same conference that created the Jewish state west of the Jordan River also created Syria, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Iraq as Arab states.

The legality of the 1922 Mandate was adopted that same year by the U.S. Congress in H.J. Res. 360 and signed by President Warren Harding. The newly created Arab country of Jordan attacked Israel in 1948 seeking to annihilate its inhabitants and illegally occupied Judea and Samaria until 1967. That year, Israel won back the territory originally allocated for a Jewish State as part of the 1922 League of Nations agreement.

There is no such thing as “’pre-67 borders.” They were merely 1949 armistice lines between Israel and neighboring countries after they launched an illegal war of extermination. It has nothing to do with the notion of a unique Arab “Palestinian” entity west of the Jordan River. There was never any internationally recognized legal sovereign occupying Judea and Samaria from the time the British Empire fell until 1967. Jordan’s occupation of the area west of the Jordan River was never recognized. To the extent there is an Arab Palestinian state it is the modern state of Jordan, which already sucked up 77% of the original Mandate of Palestine allocated for a Jewish State under the first plan of the Balfour Declaration.

In many respects, this is the biggest global fake news story of our time.

Although the U.N. has bloviated time and again about Israel “withdrawing” from the region, those are merely recommendations and political arguments. They are not legal arguments because once that land was allocated for the Jewish state by the binding charter of the U.N., it cannot be rescinded without Israel’s consent any more than Florida can be taken away from the U.S. and be returned to Spain without our consent.

Until fairly recently, even the Left was forced to admit this legal and historical reality. During an interview with Matt Lauer on October 1, 1997, then-Secretary of State Madelaine Albright reluctantly admitted that although she was unhappy about recent construction in Judea, it was indeed legal:

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: I wasn’t happy. We had had a conversation, and I felt
that going forward with those kinds of buildings was not helpful. It is not
in any way not part of what they can do, but they shouldn’t do it.MR. LAUER: It’s legal.SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: It’s legal. But I think that, in this kind of an
atmosphere, it’s very important not to take actions that are viewed by the
other side as creating more difficulties.

Unfortunately, over the past generation the geo-political elites and the media has repeated the lie about an Arab “Palestinian state” and “illegal Israeli settlements” so many times that it has become true in the minds of so many people. It’s a classic strategy domestic liberals employ when they conflate political arguments with legal arguments. In many respects, this is the biggest global fake news story of our time.

The reality is that Arab squatters living in that region have no legal right to a state in that land, much less a right to murder Jews who build homes in the rightful territory of their state duly adopted by international law. But even those who subscribed to this nonsense over the past few decades must wake up and smell the Jihad. The fact that Jihad has spread to every corner of the world, including in the West itself, should demonstrate incontrovertibly that the source of the problem is not a few homes built in the Samarian hills by Jews. The problem is global Islamic supremacism.

It was heartening to see Donald Trump release a statement opposing the U.N. resolution and threaten their funding. But he needs to take it a step further and end the entire policy of promoting a second Palestinian State (the first being Jordan) altogether. Pursuit of an Arab “Palestinian” state has been one of the most wrongheaded failed policies in modern history and it’s time for the Republican Party to formally abandon it forever.

 

Is General Mattis on a Collision Course with Keith Ellison?

For Gen. Mattis as SecDef, Mission is Iran

Keith Ellison’s Life as NIAC Cheerleader

The would-be head of the DNC has a long, cozy history with the Tehran lobby

**** Keith Ellison seems void of this information or he conveniently ignores it. Does the DNC really want him as Chairman?

Declassified IDF Map Shows Hezbollah Installations Embedded in Civilian Areas

Tower: A map released Tuesday by the Israel Defense Forces shows the degree to which Hezbollah has embedded itself into the Lebanese civilian population. The map shows hundreds of military emplacements, including weapons depots, rocket launchers, and terror tunnels, that Hezbollah has constructed in preparation for its next war against Israel.

2016-12-06_idf_hezbollah_map

Hezbollah’s deliberate positioning of military infrastructure in Lebanese villages, a tactic that the IDF has called a “war crime,” is consistent with the Iran-backed terror organization’s history of exploiting civilians to launch wars against Israel.

It was reported in 2013 that Hezbollah was paying poor Shi’ite families in southern Lebanon to allow them to store weapons in their homes, effectively making them human shields.

An Israeli defense official told The New York Times in May 2015 that Hezbollah’s buildup in southern Lebanese villages meant that “civilians are living in a military compound….We will hit Hezbollah hard, while making every effort to limit civilian casualties as much as we can…[but] we do not intend to stand by helplessly in the face of rocket attacks.” A few days later, a newspaper linked to Hezbollah confirmed the Israeli assessment.

Hezbollah has “turned the Shiite villages…into essentially missile silos,” Jonathan Schanzer, the vice president for research at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, said in July.

Noting the threat posed by Hezbollah’s extensive rocket arsenal and its placement among civilians, Geoff Corn, an international military law expert at the South Texas College of Law in Houston, observed earlier this year that the resulting devastation from a war with these conditions would “both legally and morally…lie solely at the feet of Hezbollah.”

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701, which was passed unanimously to end the 2006 war between Israel and Hezbollah, forbids countries from transferring weapons to the terror organization. However, Iran has continued to arm Hezbollah, and the Security Council has refused to act to enforce the resolution.

The IDF released a similar map two years ago showing that Hamas—also an Iranian client—had used a civilian neighborhood in Gaza to house its terrorist infrastructure.

**** There is more:

Iran possesses the largest and most diverse missile arsenal in the Middle East, with thousands of short and medium-range ballistic and cruise missiles capable of striking as far as Israel and southeast Europe.These weapon systems have become a central tool of Iranian power projection and anti-access/area-denial capabilities in the face of superior U.S. and Gulf Cooperation Council naval and air power in the Arabian Gulf region. While Iran has not yet tested or deployed a missile capable of striking the United States, it continues to hone longer-range missile technologies under the auspices of its space-launch program. In addition to increasing the quantity of its missile arsenal, Iran is investing in qualitative improvements to in its missile’s accuracy and lethality. Iran has also become a center for missile proliferation, supplying proxies such as Hezbollah and Syria’s al-Assad regime with a steady supply of missiles rockets, as well as local production capability. Furthermore, Iran is likely supplying Houthi rebel groups with short-range missiles in the ongoing conflict in Yemen.

Iranian Missiles

For Gen. Mattis as SecDef, Mission is Iran

Outside of all the hype of the moniker of ‘mad-dog’ and with a call sign of ‘chaos’, there is much more to be known and understood about General Mattis and what his immediate objectives will be when confirmed as Secretary of Defense.

 

Mattis served on the Board of General Dynamics and is a Visiting Fellow of the Hoover Institute. With his dedication and loyalty to all those that have and are wearing the military uniform, Mattis is also on the Advisory Board of Spirit of America, an organization dedicated to the success and conditions of all service personnel.

Mattis supports a two-state solution for Israel, something that will never in opinion be a viable peace alternative. The General has also given praise to John Kerry for his attempts at a Middle East peace program. While noble, that dog wont hunt either.

James Mattis will be assertive on matters with Pakistan, Iraq and Afghanistan. He tells us that under the management of Barack Obama and his weaning power from the Middle East, the United States is suffering from ‘strategic atrophy’,

It is notable that General Mattis has a personal library of more than 7000 books and while in active service published a reading list for his Marines. Indeed, Mattis is a scholar of history that includes previous wars, tactics, military leadership and results. That does tell us he has a wide and deep comprehension for understanding fully the past yielding probable and realistic estimates for the future of global equilibrium.

Related reading: France’s History of Terror, Murder and Iran

Through his military life, Mattis has encountered Iran intervention, terror, lies and tactics in countless war theaters. When it comes to Iran, the outset of his mission as Secretary of Defense will be the measured and required stipulations of the Joint Plan of Action (nuclear deal) with Iran and that will be coupled with Iran’s military influence and intervention in all the Middle East theaters of war but will also include Iran’s influence in Latin America and Europe.

All military leaders want talks, deal and diplomatic programs to be fully exhausted before the armed forces are called in to clean up messes where those other efforts have failed. For this reason, the General agrees in part with the Iran deal in spirit but there are countless violations and the financial infusion received by Iran at the hands of the United States under Barack Obama and John Kerry, supplemented by the trade and commerce plans have given rise to further concerns for Mattis. Not only does Israel feel minimized and threatened by Iran, but many other nations do as well due to the continued aggressive behavior of Iran so key Gulf Nations will have a robust role in coming months.

Iran is watching and doing so closely and their threats launched by words and deeds are likely to escalate. For Iran there is hard power and soft power and then power by proxy, such is the case in Latin America, Syria and Iraq, at least. Going back to 2008, Iran’s footprint across the world has not changed and in some regions has only been more stubborn, obvious and apparent. Dealing with the matter of Iran would begin to restore a balance of peace, or will it, can it?

Congress just cleared unanimous votes on sanctions for Iran. Iran has been proven to violate the terms of the JCPOA that included findings from German Intelligence.

With the ink barely dry on the deal between the U.S. and Iran to prevent the Islamic Republic from securing nuclear weapons, a new German intelligence document charges that Iran continues to flout the agreement. Germany’s domestic intelligence agency said in its annual report that Iran has a “clandestine” effort to seek illicit nuclear technology and equipment from German companies “at what is, even by international standards, a quantitatively high level.” The findings by the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, Germany’s equivalent of the FBI, were issued in a 317-page report last week. German Chancellor Angela Merkel underscored the findings in a statement to parliament, saying Iran violated the United Nations Security Council’s anti-missile development regulations. “Iran continued unabated to develop its rocket program in conflict with the relevant provisions of the UN Security Council,” Merkel told the Bundestag.

***

Recorded on  July 16, 2015 – Hoover fellows Charles Hill and James Mattis discuss the Iran deal and the state of the world on Uncommon Knowledge with Hoover fellow Peter Robinson. In their view the United States has handed over its leading role to Iran and provided a dowry along with it. Iran will become the leading power in the region as the United States pulls back; as the sanctions are lifted Iran will start making a lot of money. No matter what Congress does at this point, the sanctions are gone. Furthermore, the president will veto anything Congress comes up with to move the deal forward. This  de facto treaty circumvents the Constitution.

If we want better deals and a stronger presence in the international community, then the United States needs to compromise, and listen to one another other, and encourage other points of view, especially from the three branches of government. If the United States pulls back from the international community, we will need to relearn the lessons we learned after World War I. But if we engage more with the world and use solid strategies to protect and encourage democracy and freedom at home and abroad, then our military interventions will be fewer. The United States and the world will be in a better position to handle problems such as ISIS.

France’s History of Terror, Murder and Iran

How bad was Iran during the Carter administration with the revolution and the hostages? It should be noted that nothing has changed in the last several decades.

‘A Darker Horizon’: The Assassination of Shapour Bakhtiar

1979

January 3 With strikes and street protests paralyzing the country, the Majles, Iran’s parliament, provisionally approves Shapour Bakhtiar as the new prime minister. During his five-and-a-half weeks in office he will oust the martial law governor of Tehran, General Gholam Ali Oveisi; lay the groundwork for the prosecution of other high officials close to the Shah; start to dismantle the secret police force SAVAK; order the release of all political prisoners; end press censorship; reopen the universities; cancel $7 billion in purchase orders for U.S. arms; and announce plans to hold elections for a constituent assembly to determine the monarchy’s fate. The Revolution continues. Shouts of “Bakhtiar nokar-e bee-ekhtiar” (Bakhtiar the powerless servant) ring through the Tehran streets.

BakhtiarShahJan16.jpgJanuary 6 Bakhtiar presents his cabinet to the Shah and is sworn into office. From the French village of Neauphle-le-Château, Khomeini rejects the new government, declaring it illegal. In a letter read out in Iranian mosques, he equates acceptance of Bakhtiar’s premiership with “obedience to false gods.” Bakhtiar is expelled from the Iran Party and the National Front.

January 16 The Majles gives Bakhtiar the constitutionally prescribed vote of confidence that officially makes him prime minister. He heads from the parliamentary building to Tehran’s international airport to bid a formal farewell to the Shah, who is about to depart for a supposedly “temporary” exile that will comprise the remaining 17 months of his life. (The two men are seen here facing each other immediately before the monarch boards his plane.) The Shah tells him, “I hope you will succeed. I give Iran into your care, yours and God’s.”

Late January Bakhtiar sends several cables to Neauphle-le-Château, saying he is ready to visit France to meet with Khomeini. The response to each request for an audience is the same: “First you must resign and then only shall you be received.”

February 1 Having previously announced, “We look forward to having the honor of soon welcoming home Ayatollah Khomeini,” Bakhtiar allows the charismatic cleric to return to Iran after years in exile. Khomeini immediately denounces Bakhtiar’s government, proclaiming, “I shall kick their teeth in. I appoint the government. I appoint the government by support of this nation.”

February 4 Responding to Khomeini’s threats — including one the previous day in which the ayatollah warned, “Do not provoke me to invite people to stage a jihad” — Bakhtiar says,

Iran has one government. More than this is intolerable, either for me or for you or for any other Iranian. As a Muslim, I had not heard that jihad refers to one Muslim against other Muslims. Those fomenting a civil war will be put in front of the firing squad. I will compromise neither with the Shah nor with Khomeini. I will not give permission to Ayatollah Khomeini to form an interim government. In life there comes a time when one must stand firm and say no…. I have never seen a book about an Islamic Republic; neither has anyone else for that matter…. Some of the people surrounding the Ayatollah are like violent vultures…. The clergy should go to Qom and build a wall around themselves and create their own Vatican.

February 5 Khomeini proclaims a provisional revolutionary government and introduces the prime minister he has selected to head it, Mehdi Bazargan. Khomeini declares, “Since I have appointed him, he must be obeyed. The nation must obey him. This is not an ordinary government. It is a government based on the sharia [Islamic law]. Opposing this government means opposing the sharia of Islam.”

Bakhtiar addresses the Majles in response:

The Iranian nation and Iranian state are indivisible entities: one country, one government, one constitution, or nothing else. We will tolerate this thing about anybody forming their own government as long as it is a joke and in words only, but if they take action in this regard, we shall reply with our own actions. If blood is spilled and aggression is committed against the people, I will expose the aggressors without regard to their name or position. I shall remain in the position of the legitimate prime minister of this country until free elections are held…. Whoever enjoys a majority, shall then govern.

2 p.m., February 11 With Tehran a virtual war zone, Iran’s Supreme Military Council announces itself “neutral in the current political disputes…in order to prevent further disorder and bloodshed.” Revolutionary forces take control of government buildings and media centers. The last government established under the monarchy collapses and Bakhtiar goes into hiding.

March 30 and 31 Iranians vote on a referendum asking, “Should the monarchy be abolished in favor of an Islamic government?” No other alternative to monarchy is proposed. The measures passes with 98 percent approving.

May 14 Ayatollah Sadegh Khalkhali, appointed by Khomeini to head the newly established Revolutionary Courts, tells Kayhan newspaper that Bakhtiar has been sentenced to death in absentia for “sowing corruption on earth.” Declaring that “those who left Iran after the Revolution were considered genuine criminals” and “incurred the death penalty,” he states that Bakhtiar is among 12 of the Shah’s relatives and officials then in hiding or exile who have been condemned for “making a campaign against Imam Khomeini.” He announces that any Iranian who carries out the death sentence on foreign territory will be considered an agent of the court.

May 16 In a public speech, Khomeini charges Bakhtiar with “treason.”

July 31 Bakhtiar emerges in Paris. While in hiding, he solicited the French government’s aid and was provided with a false passport by the Fourth Republic’s ambassador in Tehran. Successfully disguised as a Christian pastor returning home — former French Prime Minister Félix Gaillard once reportedly said that Bakhtiar spoke French better than a native — he flies from Iran to Paris-Orly Airport. Upon arrival, he speaks out publicly against the Islamic regime and describes Khomeini as “ignorant, uncultured, narrow-minded, and obstinate.”

Mid-September Bakhtiar organizes an anti-Khomeini rally in London and announces that he will continue to resist the new regime until the ayatollah relinquishes power.

December 7 Shahryar Shafiq, the son of Ashraf Pahlavi, the Shah’s twin sister, is gunned down on a Paris street. An Iranian suspect will be apprehended in Britain and extradited to France.

In Tehran, Khalkhali excoriates Bakhtiar for “actively opposing Ayatollah Khomeini from his exile in Paris.”

1980

May Amid escalating tensions between the Islamic Republic and the regime of Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, Bakhtiar visits Iraq with assurances that the Iranian people will not rally in defense of the Khomeini government. A new Baghdad-based radio station begins broadcasting pro-Bakhtiar messages intended for an Iranian audience.

Mid-June France’s L’Express magazine publishes a story featuring Khalkhali. (It is, at present, unclear whether the piece involved an original interview or was largely culled from statements that had already appeared in the Iranian media.) “I have sent a commando unit to get him,” the ayatollah is quoted as saying in reference to Bakhtiar. “He can not escape us.”

July 9 Iranian authorities discover and suppress a coup attempt involving a network of over 1,000 military personnel, policemen, and civilians. From Paris, Bakhtiar has channeled financial support to part of the network. More than 140 participants in what comes to be known as the Nuzhih plot are executed around Iran over the following month.

8:45 a.m., July 18 A five-man hit squad led by Anis Naccache, a Lebanese national and self-described former member of the Palestinian resistance group Fatah, carries out an assassination attempt on Bakhtiar at his then residence, an apartment in the Parisian suburb of Neuilly-sur-Seine.

The team members, using forged press credentials, talk their way past the French policemen stationed in front of the apartment building. Inside, they shoot and kill the officer assigned to vet visitors more rigorously. Upstairs, the hit squad heads to the wrong apartment and kills a neighbor of Bakhtiar’s when she opens her door; her sister is wounded. They head to the correct door and ring the bell, but Bakhtiar’s cousin, suspicious of the unexpected, early-hour visit, attaches the door’s security chain before opening it. The assailants’ attempts to shoot their way into the apartment fail and they take flight. Intercepted by the police outside, they shoot one, paralyzing him for life, before they are subdued. (For a short French television report on the attack, see here.)

July 22 Ali Tabatabaei, who served under the Shah as press attaché in Iran’s embassy in the United States and joined the opposition after the Revolution, is murdered at his home in Bethesda, Maryland. The killer is Dawud Salahuddin, an American convert to Islam, who later says he was paid $5,000 to commit the assassination. He makes his way via Paris and Geneva to Iran, where he continues to reside.

BakhtiarIntenseMics.jpgAugust Bakhtiar establishes the National Movement of Iranian Resistance (NAMIR; the organization, whose Farsi name is Nehzat-e Moghavemat-e Meli Iran, is also referred to as NRMI and NMIR). While the group officially promotes the establishment of a social-democratic government in Iran, Bakhtiar does not forswear the possibility of a constitutional monarchy, which helps to attract the support of some monarchists even as it repels other opponents of the Islamic regime.Early September An Iranian organization identifying itself as Neghab (Mask, or Veil) claims responsibility for the attempted “uprising” that was crushed by the regime two months earlier. Its communiqué declares that “the path of Mosaddegh is that of the people” and that “Bakhtiar is its authentic leader.” Decrying the new Islamic dictatorship, it states, “We have risen up to put an end to this curse and to entrust the affairs of our land to the faithful disciple of Mosaddegh — Shapour Bakhtiar.”

September 22 Iraq invades Iran, setting off a war that will last for eight years.

1982

March 10 Four members of the hit squad that attempted to kill Bakhtiar two years earlier, including Naccache, are sentenced to life imprisonment; the fifth is sentenced to 20 years. With the exception of one hearing, the accused men refused to attend the trial, announcing, “Only Allah is a judge.” During his single appearance, Naccache says the assassination plan was justified by a verdict issued by the Islamic Revolutionary Court in Tehran.

1984

February 7 General Gholam Ali Oveisi, the Tehran military governor who was forced out by Bakhtiar five years earlier, and his brother, Gholam Hossein Oveisi, are assassinated in Paris. The case remains unsolved.

1985-86

Between December 7, 1985, and September 17, 1986, Paris suffers from a bombing campaign in which 11 explosions kill 13 people and injure 255. An Islamist group calling itself the Committee of Solidarity with Arab and Middle East Political Prisoners — or CSPPA, the acronym for its French name — claims responsibility. The group is evidently closely linked with the Lebanese Hezbollah, which receives both ideological guidance and material support from the Islamic Republic. The CSPPA demands the release of three people imprisoned in France, including Anis Naccache “of the jihad.”

1987

January 16 Ali Akbar Mohammadi, a former pilot for Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, is assassinated by two men in Hamburg. He had flown a plane to Baghdad and defected the previous year. The case remains unsolved.

May 19 Hamid Reza Chitgar, first secretary of Iran’s Hezb-e Kaar (Labor Party), disappears after traveling from his Paris home to Vienna. Killed by a gunshot to the back of the head, his corpse is found two months later in a Vienna apartment. A man identifying himself as Ali Amiztab apparently corresponded with Chitgar from Iran for about two years and lured him to the Austrian capital, supposedly to discuss the establishment of a group for Labor Party supporters. The case remains unsolved.

June Information derived from wiretaps lead French investigators to identify Wahid Gordji, who has a position as a translator at the Iranian Embassy in Paris, of coordinating the CSPPA bombing campaign. He avoids imminent arrest by fleeing to the embassy, where Iran claims he is protected although he is not a registered diplomat. A months-long standoff ensues as French police surround the building, and Iranian police encircle the French Embassy in Tehran in retaliation.

July Iran and France sever diplomatic relations and Hezbollah takes several French citizens hostage in Lebanon.

November Gordji is briefly interviewed by French authorities, then flies to Iran. The hostages in Lebanon are released soon afterward. Iran claims that France expedited the repayment of Iranian loans, paid millions of dollars to the Lebanese kidnappers, and agreed to suppress the activity of French-based opponents of the Islamic Republic. French Prime Minister Jacques Chirac denies that there was any deal.

1988

June Full diplomatic relations are restored between France and Iran.

1989

July 13 Abdulrahman Ghassemlou, leader of the Democratic Party of Iranian Kurdistan (DPIK), and his aides Abdollah Ghaderi, Fadal Mala, and Mamoud Rassoul, meet with Iranian representatives Mohammad Jafari Sahraroudi, Amir Bozorgnia, and Kurdistan provincial governor Mostafa Ajoudi in a Vienna apartment. Shots are fired, killing Ghassemlou and his aides. The murders are reported to the police by the Iranian delegation, who deny any responsibility. The Austrian police, after taking statements, release the Iranian representatives. They are expelled from Austria, after which the police conclude that they were probably the culprits.

August 26 Bahman Javadi (aka Gholam Keshavarz), a member of the central committee of the Communist Party of Iran and a top figure in its Kurdish branch, Komaleh, is assassinated in Lanarca, Cyprus. The case remains unsolved.

Autumn According to his later testimony to French investigators, Fariborz Karimi, an Iranian exile in Paris, is solicited by a friend of his, Manouchehr Akasheh, to meet him in Frankfurt to discuss an important matter. Karimi and Akasheh know each other through their membership in NAMIR. Karimi discusses the solicitation with Bakhtiar, with whom he has become quite close, and they agree he should go and find out what Akasheh wants.

In Germany, Karimi is offered “$600,000, a house in Tehran, and anything else” to kill Bakhtiar by poisoning his vodka. According to Karimi, the VEVAK recruiter who makes the offer tells him the poison, half a small vial’s worth of white powder, “is colorless. No one will know. They will think he had a stroke.” On his third day in Frankfurt he receives a direct call from Hojatoleslam Ali Fallahian — then assistant to the chief of VEVAK — encouraging him to accept the mission.

Karimi returns to Paris without directly rejecting the proposal. A month later, he receives another call from Fallahian, using the name “Hossein,” pressuring him to do the job. Fearing for his life, Karimi publicly denounces Bakhtiar, moves to London, and tries to lie low, but Fallahian tracks him down a third time. Karimi flees to Canada and eventually the United States, where he is granted asylum.

1990

April 24 Dr. Kazem Rajavi, elder brother of Massoud Rajavi, leader of the Mojahedin-e Khalgh Organization (MKO), is assassinated in a village near Geneva. Rajavi, Iran’s first ambassador to the United Nations headquarters in Geneva after the Revolution, resigned and became active in the National Council of Resistance, MKO’s political arm. The case remains unsolved.

July 15 Ali Kashefpour, a member of the DPIK central committee residing in Turkey, is kidnapped, severely tortured, and killed. The case remains unsolved.

September 6 Effat Ghazi, daughter of Ghazi Mohammad, the Kurdish leader and president of the Mahabad Republic — a breakaway state formed in 1946 and soon crushed by government forces — is killed in Sweden by a letter bomb intended for her husband, Kurdish activist Amir Ghazi. The case remains unsolved.

July 28 The five men convicted of participating in the 1980 assassination attempt on Bakhtiar in which two people were murdered are pardoned and released by the French government. Accompanied by two officials from the Iranian Embassy in Paris, Naccache is flown immediately to Tehran. He later asserts that the pardons were part of a 1988 deal between France and Iran to secure the release of three French nationals held hostage by Shia paramilitaries in Lebanon.

October 24 Cyrus Elahi, a member of the opposition monarchist group Derafsh-e Kaviani (Flag of Freedom), is assassinated at his home in Paris. The case remains unsolved.

1991

BakhtiarAndBoroumand.jpgApril 18 Bakhtiar’s chief assistant in the National Movement of Iranian Resistance, Abdolrahman Boroumand (pictured here, in the foreground, with Bakhtiar), is stabbed to death in the lobby of his Paris apartment building. The case remains unsolved.Early summer Iranian secret agents establish an operations center in two Istanbul apartments, one owned and the other newly rented by Mesut Edipsoy, then 31, an Iranian Turk with alleged ties to Turkish organized crime. Edipsoy, also known as Edybnia in the United States, travels frequently to Los Angeles and Orange County.

July Bakhtiar calls a meeting to select a successor to Boroumand. Farydoun Boyerahmadi, a 38-year-old member of the resistance movement — whose brother happens to be a member of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps — attends and lays flowers on the empty chair symbolically set aside for their dead comrade. (Boyerahmadi is referred to in many accounts as a “friend” of Bakhtiar’s. A former high-ranking Iranian official who was indisputably close to Bakhtiar challenges that description; he says that Boyerahmadi was able to ingratiate himself and work his way into the opposition leader’s circle by defending Bakhtiar in the media and leveraging some old tribal ties. The official concludes, “No. A friend? No.”) Afterward, Boyerahmadi puts in a call to Istanbul.

Mid- to late July Through the Iranian Ministry of Telecommunications and Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting, Ali Vakili Rad, then 32, and Mohammad Azadi, then 31 — later alleged to be intelligence agents — obtain French visas based on the claim that they are businessmen going on an electronics shopping trip. The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs issues Vakili Rad and Azadi passports with false names. In Istanbul, investigators later say, a master forger is retained to counterfeit additional passports — Turkish — and visas — Swiss.

Upon their arrival in Paris, Vakili Rad and Azadi learn from Boyerahmadi, who frequently visits Bakhtiar’s home to do odd jobs, that the exile leader’s housekeeper and gardener are about to depart for vacation. Aside from his personal secretary and the French policemen who guard his house, Bakhtiar will be alone.

5 p.m., August 6 Boyerahmadi, accompanied by Vakili Rad and Azadi, drives his BMW to the home of Bakhtiar, who is expecting them. The visitors wear suits and black ties as a token of respect for the former prime minister, who is still grieving the death of his good friend Boroumand.

Like any other visitors, the three men turn over their passports to the guards, pass through the metal detector set up in front of the house, and are frisked without incident. The investigators’ account of what follows is based largely on forensic evidence.

5:15 p.m., August 6 Vakili Rad and Azadi join Bakhtiar in his living room. They present him with a picture frame that they have brought as a gift. Tea is served by Bakhtiar’s secretary, Soroush Katibeh, who then heads out to the kitchen terrace.

5:30 p.m., August 6 Police guards observe Boyerahmadi sitting with Katibeh. Bakhtiar is thus alone with Vakili Rad and the large, robust Azadi.

One of the men strikes a massive blow to Bakhtiar’s throat, possibly with a forearm, crushing his larynx. A lover of the passionate ghazals of Hafez, the piercingly ironic prose of Anatole France, reputed to have memorized 10,000 verses of poetry, he lies on his sofa, able neither to cry out nor even breathe.

As Bakhtiar suffocates to death, Vakili Rad and Azadi retrieve two knives from the nearby kitchen and stab him multiple times in the chest. Afterward, they use the serrated edge of one of the knives to carve at his throat and wrists. His Rolex watch is removed — a souvenir, a trophy, perhaps evidence of a mission well accomplished.

5:45 p.m., August 6 Katibeh returns from the terrace and is killed in a similar fashion. The assailants return the knives to the kitchen and wash as much blood from their clothing as is practical. They place a wastebasket in front of a window to conceal the secretary’s corpse. Bakhtiar’s corpse is left on the sofa, draped over with a tablecloth. The phone is removed from its hook.

6 p.m., August 6 The assassins exit the house. The guards notice nothing out of the ordinary, despite the remaining bloodstains on the two killers’ clothing. The three men drive off toward Paris proper. Pulling over in the Bois de Boulogne park, Vakili Rad and Azadi change into clean clothes, toss their bloody garments in a trash receptacle, and discard their false Iranian passports after shredding them.

Boyerahmadi takes them to a subway station, then abandons his bloodied BMW in the Iranian emigré neighborhood known as Téhéran-sur-Seine. It will sit there undisturbed for days.

Evening, August 6 All is quiet at the Bakhtiar compound. The police guards continue to make their rounds. Every 15 minutes, they enter “RAS” in their logs: rien à signaler — nothing to report.

Night, August 6 Having assumed the identities of Turkish citizens named Musa Kocer and Ali Haydar Kaya, Vakili Rad and Azadi travel without Boyerahmadi for the first time since their arrival in France. They are bound for the small resort town of Annecy, near the Swiss border. The route requires them to switch trains in Lyon, which has two stations. The operatives, neither of whom speaks French, get off at the wrong one. They miss their connection to Annecy.

Midnight, August 7 A call is placed to the Istanbul operations center from Lyon. Days later, a taxi driver will tell police investigators that “the big one,” Azadi, used the pay phone outside the rail station.

Morning to night, August 7 At the Bakhtiar compound, the guards fail to notice when his secretary does not make the customary morning delivery of the day’s agenda. In the vestibule of the house, sacks of groceries, dropped off as usual, go unretrieved. The phone is constantly busy, but this is unremarkable given how much time the former prime minister spends talking on it.

While the failure to discover the crime has given the murderers a substantial head start, it is making their handlers in Istanbul very nervous. There are no press reports to confirm the assassination. Despite the fact that Vakili Rad and Azadi have already made contact, a call is placed from the operations center to an Iranian woman in Paris, Fereshteh Jahanbani, who will later admit to investigators that she was employed by VEVAK. The Istanbul caller, her case officer, asks if there is any news of Bakhtiar. There is not, so she agrees to make inquires.

Late night, August 7 Vakili Rad and Azadi finally arrive at the Swiss border. A border guard examines their fake Turkish passports. In the course of their stop-and-start flight across France, they waited too long to stick in their counterfeit Swiss visa stamps. The stamps are still moist, arousing the guard’s suspicion. On further inspection, he determines that the visas, supposedly issued in Tehran, bear serial numbers of Swiss consulates in France. The Iranians are denied entry and handed over to French border guards — who release them almost immediately.

Noon, August 8 Bakhtiar’s son Guy, a local police officer, returns from a trip and arrives at the house in Suresnes. Forty-two hours after the killings, long enough for mold to bloom on the unfinished cups of tea in the parlor, the two decomposing bodies are discovered.

August 8-9 News spreads of Bakhtiar’s murder, and Iranians in France react. Aides to the NAMIR leader say that the French government, looking to improve its relationship with Iran, had been pressuring Bakhtiar to stop his political activity and had recently reduced his security detail. “France closed its eyes and let Iran kill Shahpour Bakhtiar,” says one aide, Iraj Soltani.

August 12 Meanwhile, Azadi and Vakili Rad at last make it across the border to Annecy. Their problems in getting out of France have obliged the Istanbul operations center to place calls to Tehran, Paris, London, Los Angeles, and elsewhere — each of those calls ultimately yielding clues to what investigators describe as VEVAK’s international network. More evidence will come from the wallet one of the two men leaves in an Annecy phone booth. Their next stop: Geneva.

August 13 Zeynalabedine (Zia) Sarhadi, a grandnephew of Rafsanjani’s, the Iranian president since 1989, enters Switzerland. Assigned to an archivist’s position at the Iranian Embassy in Bern, his order of mission from the Foreign Ministry is initialed by a top bureau official above the typed words “for the foreign minister” — Ali Akbar Velayati, one of the most powerful members of the Rafsanjani administration.

Mid-August Pictures of the last three visitors to Bakhtiar’s house are distributed to news outlets throughout Europe and international arrest warrants are issued. Swiss border police alert anti-terrorism authorities that the Iranian operatives tried to enter Switzerland a day after the killings.

Boyerahmadi, hiding in Paris, tells a confidant (and subsequent prosecution witness) that he is awaiting documents for a trip to the United States. Some time after August 15, he apparently departs France. Investigators later say he has relatives near Washington, D.C., and in Germany and likely changed identities to make his escape.

Arriving in Geneva, Vakili Rad and Azadi check into different hotels, parting ways to make it seem that each has been traveling solo. According to French investigators, phone data — supported by guest registers and the testimony of hotel staff — show that “archivist” Sarhadi was in touch with both the Istanbul center and the Geneva hotel where Azadi stayed.

Arrangements are made to get the operatives out of Europe. They are to meet their contacts outside the offices of Iran Air. Azadi makes his appointment and apparently returns home to Iran. Vakili Rad gets lost and arrives at his appointment 10 minutes late. His contact has gone.

Early morning, August 21 Vakili Rad, wandering aimlessly alongside the shore of Lake Geneva, is arrested by Swiss police. He has attempted to disguise himself by shaving off his mustache.

Afternoon, August 21 The Istanbul operations center shuts down. The last agent manning the phones departs for Iran.

Late August-early September Aided by the testimony of the Lyon cab driver and the abandoned wallet, French investigators, led by Magistrate Jean-Louis Bruguiere, are tracing the killers’ escape route. Using the national telephone system’s automated records, an analysis is run on 20,000 calls placed from public phones along their trail. Two of the numbers to which they are linked lead to the Istanbul apartments provided by Edipsoy for the operations center. A prostitute who works the Bois de Boulogne informs police of the bloody garments she found discarded in the park. Though she has cleaned them to give to a boyfriend, lab tests are later able to tie the clothes to both the Iranian operatives and the victims.

Switzerland extradites Vakili Rad to France. Interrogated by Bruguiere, he admits to being present at the killing of Bakhtiar and his secretary, but denies any connection to the Iranian government.

September 13 The operatives also left a paper trail. Poring over thousands of visa applications, investigators have found ones submitted by the two men — the endorsement on them comes from Syfax, a French electronics company. Syfax officials say they acted at the behest of Iranian businessman Massoud Hendi, a grandnephew of Khomeini’s and former IRIB Paris correspondent. Hendi is arrested while on vacation with his family in the French capital.

September 17 Hendi is indicted. He admits his involvement in attempting to acquire the visas, but claims to have acted innocently: by his account, Hossein Sheikhattar, a senior aide to Iran’s telecommunications minister, asked him to help out two “friends.” After his indictment is made public, IRIB issues a statement denouncing Hendi as a French agent and claiming he is “no relation to Imam Khomeini or to his family.”

October While Edipsoy eludes capture, the French investigators are able to analyze the calls made from his apartments. One leads to Jahanbani. A raid on her Paris home turns up encoding devices, a pen with disappearing ink, and other evidence identifying her as an Iranian intelligence agent. Before and just after the assassination, other calls were made from the Istanbul operations center to the Iranian Telecommunications Ministry, to IRIB headquarters, and to a Tehran number which other evidence also indicated was used by the Iranian secret service. Calls were also placed to the Geneva hotels where Vakili Rad and Azadi stayed.

October 27 The Independent in Britian publishes an interview with Naccache, the 1980 hit squad commander, in which he says,

I had no personal feelings against Bakhtiar, it was purely political. He had been sentenced to death by the Iranian Revolutionary Tribunal. They sent five of us to execute him…. I came to have contacts with the Iranian opponents of the Shah in Beirut and Tyre. That’s how I found myself involved in the Iranian revolution…. I became convinced that a revolution had to be safeguarded and protected…. With Bakhtiar, I felt there was a danger of a coup like the one against Mosadeq [sic]. That’s why we decided to assassinate him. It was a sentence of death against him, to be carried out as an execution. Bakhtiar was the head of a plot to carry out a coup against the revolution and come back to Iran.

December 23 Sarhadi is detained in Switzerland on an international arrest warrant. Investigators say that documents in his possession show he received support from various Iranian agencies to facilitate the arrangements for the Bakhtiar killers’ escape. After five months, he will be extradited to France.

1992

August 8 The corpse of Fereydoun Farrokhzad, a popular exiled Iranian singer, is found in his Bonn home. He has been stabbed 40 times and beheaded. The case remains unsolved.

August 30 In an interview aired on Iranian state television, Fallahian boasts of VEVAK’s foreign operations prowess. Speaking of the regime’s political opposition, he says, “We track them outside the country, too. We have them under surveillance…. Last year, we succeeded in striking fundamental blows to their top members.”

September 17 Dr. Sadegh Sharafkandi, Abdulrahman Ghassemlou’s successor as head of the Democratic Party of Iranian Kurdistan, and three aides, Homayoun Ardalan, Fattah Abdollahi, and Nouri Dehkordi, are assassinated in a Berlin restaurant. The event becomes known as the Mykonos Incident, after the name of the Greek eatery where the killings take place.

1993

January French investigators have followed the trail of the conspiracy to Los Angeles, where Edipsoy frequently traveled and from where logistical support for the killers may have come. Fariborz Karimi tells them how he was solicited to kill Bakhtiar four years earlier. Despite that, Edipsoy’s activity, and other evidence, the French team is frustrated when the regional U.S. attorney’s office, citing inadequate probable cause, turns down their search and arrest warrant requests. According to the Los Angeles Times, one French investigator later says of U.S. officials, “We told them there is a network of terrorists operating in your country. The Americans seemed to resent being told.”

1994

March A French judicial panel, having spent a month with the documents turned over by Bruguiere and his investigative team — 18 volumes worth — hears arguments from attorneys in the Bakhtiar assassination case. Speaking with Time anonymously, a French official says, “This case marks the first time that we have so many proofs of the implication of the state in an operation of this importance.” The most significant material evidence for that claim relates to Sarhadi, President Rafsanjani’s young relative, who is charged with facilitating the killers’ escape (or attempted escape) from Europe. His lawyer concedes that Sarhadi’s “passport arrived in Switzerland on Aug. 13, 1991,” but not the man himself; the passport was “stolen,” claims the lawyer, after it was handed over to Iranian airport police.

April The U.S. State Department issues a report on global terrorism that claims, “Tehran’s policy makers view terrorism as a valid tool to accomplish their political objectives, and acts of terrorism are approved at the highest levels of the Iranian government.” It continues,

Iranian intelligence continues to stalk members of the Iranian opposition in the United States, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. Despite Tehran’s attempts to distance itself from direct involvement in terrorist acts, Iran has been linked to several assassinations of dissidents during the past year…. All of the murders were carried out by professional assassins; no arrests have been made.

Late October-early November “Terrorism is trying to destroy our society. It’s like a war,” says Bruguiere in an interview on the eve of the trial of nine Iranian nationals on charges related to the Bakhtiar assassination. “Organized crime has an understandable goal, to make profits for its members. But terrorism seeks to destroy our values, our democratic systems. We must fight it with the arm of the law.”

In the course of their lengthy investigation into the phone calls from the Istanbul center, French authorities have uncovered other apparent Iranian intelligence operatives around Europe. Evidence found in the office safe of an Iran Air official at Paris-Orly Airport indicates that he was involved in the forging of runway access badges. He was also holding the long-lost wallet and passport of a French businessman, suggesting that they might be used to create fake identities for Iranian agents. In England, investigators expose an Iranian interior decorator near Birmingham as what they call a “dormant mole” for VEVAK. He is detained by British authorities for interrogation.

Bracing for possible terrorist attacks similar to those that followed the trial of the unsuccessful 1980 hit squad, police ramp up security around train stations and department stores. Marksmen line the Palais de Justice roof. In an effort to minimize tensions with Iran, one French Justice Ministry spokesman insists, “This is a murder trial, not a trial of Khomeini or Rafsanjani. The issue will be simply this: Who is the murderer and who is the accomplice?”

In contrast, Ali Chakeri, who has replaced Bakhtiar as head of NAMIR, accuses Iran of pursuing an international campaign to extinguish dissent. “We don’t care so much if the accused suspects are convicted,” he says in an interview. “What is most important to us, the victims of this violence, is that Iran is convicted.” Speaking with the Los Angeles Times, a senior French justice official reveals a similarly broad view of the stakes: “Iran seems to regard political assassination as its national right, even on foreign soil. Any country that enforces its laws against murder is seen [as] interfering in the sovereign affairs of Iran.”

November 2 The trial begins under massive security. Three defendants are in the dock: Vakili Rad, Sarhadi, and Hendi, whose lawyer insists that his client’s efforts to obtain visas for Vakili Rad and Azadi “prove nothing,” since the two men actually entered the country on a different set of visas. All deny involvement in the alleged conspiracy, including Vakili Rad, notwithstanding his confession that he was at the murder scene.

Six men are being tried in absentia, including Azadi, Boyerahmadi, Edipsoy, and Sheikhattar, the Telecommunications Ministry official. The other two, businessmen Gholam Hossein Shoorideh Shriazinejad and Nasser Ghaseminejad, are accused of conspiring to aid the assassins during their Swiss sojourn. Investigators express confidence that they can show that four Islamic Republic ministries — Intelligence (VEVAK), Telecommunications, Foreign Affairs, and Interior — contributed to the murder plot. Continue reading here by PBS where more photos, videos and the balance of the timeline is explained. 

Declassified cable published by Wikileaks, one of many noted below:

1. DAVID NEWSOM AND BEN READ TALKED WITH AMBASSADOR SULLIVAN AT 2 P.M. EST TO CLARIFY A NUMBER OF QUESTIONS SURROUNDING THE ENVIRONMENT FOR POSSIBLE EVACUATION ACTIONS. STRIKING IRANIAN CIVIL AIR PERSONNEL HAVE DECLARED THAT U.S. AND ISRAELI PLANES WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO LAND IN OR FLY OVER IRAN AND THAT THE STRIKERS WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY RISKS TAKEN BY THE AIRLINES OF THOSE COUNTRIES. Sheryl P. Walter Declassified/Released US Department of State EO Systematic Review 20 Mar 2014 Sheryl P. Walter Declassified/Released US Department of State EO Systematic Review 20 Mar 2014 2. SULLIVAN SAID THAT MILITARY PERSONNEL ARE NOW IN CONTROL OF AIR TRAFFIC, NOT IRANIAN FAA CONTROLLERS. HE CONFIRMED THAT THE OVERALL SECURITY OF THE AIRPORT ITSELF IS STILL ACCEPTABLE, AND SAID ACCESS TO THE AIRPORT FROM THE CITY WAS STILL POSSIBLE ALTHOUGH THAT COULD BECOME MORE DIFFICULT. 3. ASKED ABOUT HIS ACCESS TO PEOPLE IN AUTHORITY IN THE CITY, AMBASSADOR SULLIVAN SAID IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE AT THAT JUNCTURE TO REACH ANYONE (IT WAS 10:00 P.M. TEHRAN TIME). THE 9:00 P.M. CURFEW WAS IN EFFECT AND ROVING BANDS OF RIOTERS IN THE STREETS WERE ATTACKING ANY VEHICLES REGARDLESS OF NATIONALITY. THUS, SULLIVAN WAS DOUBTFUL HE COULD REACH ANYONE UNTIL MORNING, TEHRAN TIME. 4. SULLIVAN HAD NO ESTIMATE OF WHETHER A MAC FLIGHT, DUE INTO TEHRAN THE MORNING OF JANUARY 1 WOULD BE ALLOWED TO LAND. IT WILL BE A TEST CASE OF THE SUPPOSED BAN BY THE AIRPORT WORKERS ON ALL FOREIGN FLIGHTS. 5. TOLD OF PAN AM’S REQUIREMENT THAT, EVEN TO PUT IN THEIR PLANES ON A CHARTER BASIS, THEY WOULD NEED SOME ASSURANCE THAT THEIR FACILITIES AND PERSONNEL IN TEHRAN WOULD NOT BE SUBJECT TO REPRISAL, SULLIVAN SAID HE COULD SECRET SECRET PAGE 03 STATE 000001 NOT MAKE A MEANINGFUL EVALUATION. 6. SULLIVAN SAID THE EMBASSY WOULD TRY TO REACH THE CHIEF OF THE IRANIAN AIR FORCE TO SEE IF HE COULD GET SOME KIND OF ESTIMATE ON THE OVERALL SECURITY SITUATION, INCLUDING WHETHER IT WOULD BE POSSIBLE TO GIVE ASSURANCES OF ANY KIND TO PAN AM ABOUT THEIR FACILITIES AND PEOPLE. 7. WE HAVE NEARLY 500 OFFICIAL AMERICAN DEPENDENTS LEFT IN THE TEHRAN AREA. THERE ARE AN ESTIMATED 19,000 OTHER AMERICANS IN THE CITY (30,000-35,000 IN ALL IRAN). MAC FLIGHTS ARE SCHEDULED THROUGH THE WEEK WHICH CAN BRING OUT FROM 70-140 OFFICIALS AND DEPENDENTS DAILY IF NECESSARY. PAN AM AND COMMERCIAL CHARTERS ARE ESSENTIAL TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SPACE FOR UNOFFICIAL AMERICANS. IF PAN AM DOES NOT FLY WE CAN EXPLORE CHARTERS BY OTHER AMERICAN CARRIERS OR INCREASED MAC FLIGHTS. NEWSOM AND READ ALSO EXPLORED WITH ADMIRAL LYONS (JCS) OUR OPTIONS IN A SERIOUSLY DETERIORATING SITUATION WHERE RAPID EVACUATION OF ALL BUT THE MOST ESSENTIAL AMERICANSWAS REQUIRED. MILITARY ARICRAFT CAN BEGIN ARRIVING IN TEHRAN WITHIN 12 HOURS OF OUR RECEIVING THE ORDER TO DO SO, FROM BASES IN EUROPE. Sheryl P. Walter Declassified/Released US Department of State EO Systematic Review 20 Mar 2014 Sheryl P. Walter Declassified/Released US Department of State EO Systematic Review 20 Mar 2014 THIS TIMING PRESUPPOSES ADEQUATE AIRPORT SECURITY. THE DELAY WOULD, OF COURSE, INCREASE SHOULD SECURITY ON THE GROUND DETERIORATE AND REQUIRE OUR SENDING IN OUR OWN ADVANCE SECURITY FORCES. 8. WE ARE CONTACTING THE BRITISH, FRENCH AND FRG EMBASSIES IN WASHINGTON TO GET A READING ON WHAT THEIR NATIONAL AIRLINES ARE DOING, AND WHAT THEIR INFORMATION IS ON THE SUPPOSED BAN ON FOREIGN FLIGHTS. 9. READ AND NEWSOM WILL HAVE A SECURE TELEX CONVERSATION WITH AMBASSADOR SULLIVAN AT 8:00 A.M. EST TOMORROW BY WHICH TIME THE SITUATION SHOULD BE SOMEWHAT CLARIFIED, AND WE WILL IN FACT KNOW WHETHER THE MAC FLIGHT WAS ALLOWED TO SECRET SECRET PAGE 04 STATE 000001 LAND. WE ARE BRIEFING CHAIRMAN CHURCH AND ZABLOCKI ON THIS SITUATION. 10. IN A MESSAGE JUST RECEIVED FROM SULLIVAN, THE CHIEF OF THE IRANIAN AIR FORCE HAS TOLD US THAT QUALIFIED AIR CONTROLLERS WILL BE IN THE AIRPORT TOWER TOMORROW TO ASSURE AIR SAFETY. WE WERE ALSO ASSURED OF SECURITY AT THE AIRFIELD AND FOR PAN AM GROUND PERSONNEL IN TEHRAN. WE HAVE CONVEYED THIS INFORMATION TO PAN AM. THE COMPANY’S POSITION IS THAT PAN AM WILL FLY NO PLANES TO TEHRAN TOMORROW AND WILL MAKE A DECISION ON TUESDAY FLIGHTS ON THE BASIS OF EXPERIENCE WITH MAC AND OTHER AIRLINES FLIGHTS (SWISS AIR, BA) ON MONDAY. 11. CONDITIONS IN TEHRAN AND MANY PROVINCIAL CITIES ARE NEARING THE STATE OF ANARCHY. TROOPS KEEP FIRING IN THE AIR, BUT ARE COMPLETELY INEFFECTIVE IN THEIR EFFORTS TO CONTROL ROVING GANGS AND MOBS. GANGS HAVE NOW STARTED LOOTING STORES. MOTORISTS WHO CAN FIND GASOLINE HAVE TO RUN GAUNTLETS OF FIRES AND BULLYING CROWDS TO REACH THEIR DESTINATIONS. STRIKES AND SHORTAGES (KEROSENE, FUEL OIL, BREAD) CONTINUE, WITH PRICES SKYROCKETING AND MANY ITEMS SIMPLY UNAVAILABLE AT ANY PRICE. TEHRAN IS APPROACHING COMPLETE PARALYSIS. 12. MORE AMERICANS HAVE FOUND OPPOSITION ANGER DIRECTED AT THEM. ONE EMBASSY OFFICER SUCCEEDED IN ESCAPING AFTER A MOB HAD TRAPPED HIS CAR IN AN EXCLUSIVE RESIDENTIAL SECTION OF TEHRAN. ANOTHER EMBASSY OFFICER BARELY AVOIDED A SIMILAR EXPERIENCE IN A NEARBY AREA. IF AMERICANS CANNOT TRAVEL SAFELY IN THESE AREAS WHERE MOST LIVE, THEY CANNOT DO SO ANYWHERE IN TEHRAN. SECRET Sheryl P. Walter Declassified/Released US Department of State EO Systematic Review 20 Mar 2014 Sheryl P. Walter Declassified/Released US Department of State EO Systematic Review 20 Mar 2014 SECRET PAGE 05 STATE 000001 13. EMBASSY TODAY MOVED TO PHASE ONE OF THE EMERGENCY EVACUATION PLAN AND RECOMMENDED THAT DEPENDENTS OF THE OFFICIAL AND THE PRIVATE COMMUNITIES TEMPORARILY DEPART IRAN. OUR AMBASSADOR HAS INFORMED THE IRANIAN GOVERNMENT OF THIS STEP AND HAS ALSO CONSULTED WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF OTHER GOVERNMENTS AND THE AMERICAN BUSINESS COMMUNITY. MANY AMERICAN COMPANIES ARE TRYING TO ARRANGE THEIR OWN CHARTER FLIGHTS. SEVERAL OTHER COUNTRIES HAVE MADE THE SAME RECOMMENDATION, AMONG THEM THE BRITISH AND THE WEST GERMANS. 14. DEMONSTRATIONS ALSO HIT NEARLY EVERY PROVINCIAL CITY, ALTHOUGH NOT ALL HAD TEHRAN-STYLE ROVING GANGS. IN MASHAD, PROBABLY THE WORST-HIT OF THE PROVINCIAL CITIES, MOBS REPORTEDLY DAMAGED ITS IRAN-AMERICAN SOCIETY BUILDING AND TWO POLICE PRECINCT STATIONS. SOME PRESS SOURCES CLAIM ATTACKS AGAINST RELIGIOUS LEADERS AND SEVERAL HUNDRED PERSONS KILLED OR WOUNDED. NO ACCURATE FIGURES ARE AVAILABLE. IN MANY OTHER TOWNS MOBS DESTROYED BUILDINGS AND AUTOMOBILES, AND THE EMBASSY HAS HAD REPORTS OF HEAVY CASUALTIES IN AHWAZ, CENTER OF THE SOUTHERN OIL FIELDS — AN AREA WHICH IS SEEING A FLOOD OF DEPARTURES BY MOST AMERICANS AND BRITISH CONNECTED WITH THE OIL INDUSTRY. SOME 1,000 U.S. OIL WORKERS AND THEIR FAMILIES WILL LEAVE IRAN OVER THE NEXT 3-4 DAYS. THERE ARE REPORTS OF SMALL DEMONSTRATIONS IN ISFAHAN AND SHIRAZ AND LARGER ONES BUILDING UP AT MID-DAY IN TABRIZ. TROOPS GUARDING THE AMERICAN CONSULATE COMPOUND IN TABRIZ NOW HAVE ORDERS TO FIRE INTO CROWDS IF DEMONSTRATORS ENTER COMPOUND AGAIN. 15. POLITICAL MANEUVERS HINGE ON THE PROPOSED GOVERNMENT THAT SHAHPUR BAKHTIAR IS STILL TRYING TO PUT TOGETHER. THE NATIONAL IRANIAN RADIO AND TV TODAY ANNOUNCED THAT BAKHTIAR WOULD SOON ORGANIZE A CABINET AND PRESENT IT TO SECRET SECRET PAGE 06 STATE 000001 PARLIAMENT FOR APPROVAL. THE GOVERNMENT RADIO ALSO ANNOUNCED THAT THE SHAH WOULD LEAVE IRAN FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD OF MEDICAL TREATMENT, WITHOUT SPECIFYING WHEN. WE HAVE NO CONFIRMATION FROM THE EMBASSY. THE NEXT FEW DAYS WILL SHOW WHETHER BAKHTIAR EFFORTS WILL BE SUCCESSFUL. ONE INDEPENDENT AND KNOWLEDGEABLE OPPOSITION LEADER BELIEVES BAKHTIAR’S CHANCES FOR SUCCESS ARE QUITE GOOD BE- Sheryl P. Walter Declassified/Released US Department of State EO Systematic Review 20 Mar 2014 Sheryl P. Walter Declassified/Released US Department of State EO Systematic Review 20 Mar 2014 CAUSE, IN HIS VIEW, THE MODERATE RELIGIOUS LEADERSHIP AND SOME POLITICAL OPPOSITION LEADERS FAVOR BAKHTIAR’S EFFORTS ENOUGH TO REFRAIN FROM OPPOSING HIM. IF SO, THIS WOULD MORE THAN OFFSET THE PUBLIC REJECTION OF BAKHTIAR BY HIS FORMER NATIONAL FRONT COLLEAGUES. 16. OIL PRODUCTION AGAIN DECLINED TODAY, AMOUNTING TO ONLY 218,000 BARRELS (NORMAL 6 MILLION) WHICH WAS DELIVERED TO THE ABADAN REFINERY. MEDHI BAZARGAN, THE LEADER OF THE OPPOSITION LIBERATION MOVEMENT OF IRAN HAS BEEN EMPOWERED BY KHOMEINI, AND POSSIBLY SHARIAT-MADARI, TO HEAD A GROUP THAT WOULD AUTHORIZE PRODUCTION FOR DOMESTIC NEEDS. BAZARGAN IS IN THE SOUTH, AND HIS DEMANDS ARE THAT: A) THE SECURITY OF OIL FIELD INSTALLATIONS BE HANDLED BY OIL INDUSTRY PERSONNEL AND ALL MILITARY BE WITHDRAWN, B) THAT PRODUCTION BE LIMITED TO DOMESTIC REQUIREMENTS, AND C) THAT THERE BE NO STOCKPILING BY THE MILITARY. IT IS NOT CLEAR YET WHETHER THE IRANIAN GOVERNMENT IS READY TO MEET THESE DEMANDS, PARTICULARLY CONCERNING THE SECURITY OF INSTALLATIONS. NEWSOM SECRET NNN