Muslim Brotherhood Wing at the White House

The Muslim Brotherhood has a proven history of violence going back to 1928. The reader must understand the Obama administration full acceptance, support and application of the Muslim Brotherhood doctrine.

Part 1 of 5

The Betrayal Papers will trace the influence of the Muslim Brotherhood in the Obama administration’s foreign and domestic policies. The five-part series will present a picture of a conspiracy that is manipulating the American government to the benefit of a totalitarian, genocidal movement that seeks to establish a global Islamic State.

  • The Muslim Brotherhood is an international political, financial, terrorist and movement whose goal is to establish a global Islamic State (Caliphate).
  • They have and continue to exert tremendous influence of the American government’s foreign and domestic policies under President Barack Hussein Obama.
  • The violence in the Middle East and across North Africa is a direct consequence of the Muslim Brotherhood’s effective control over American foreign policy in the region.
  • They operate through various “civic” front groups, as well as through American institutions who take their money as operational funding (Georgetown University, Brookings Institution).

In America, we have a weak and struggling economy, growing public and private debt, and millions are un- and underemployed. While a weaponized IRS targets Tea Party groups and other voices of liberty, and military veterans are labeled as “domestic terrorists” by the Department of Homeland Security, the federal government refuses to secure the southern border. Educational policy now includes the teaching Arabic and visits to mosques for schoolchildren.

Internationally, America is in retreat. The Middle East is in ashes, and in the midst of an ongoing genocide replete with daily horrors, the likes which have not been seen for centuries. Former allies have been abandoned and are embittered. Under the present leadership in the White House and State Department, Israel is considered the aggressor and Hamas the oppressed.

In sum, the world is at its most volatile point since the outbreak of World War II.

If you think that this is a result of something other than an “incompetent,” “stupid,” or “clueless” President, words regularly used by those who sense something is wrong but, can’t quite bring themselves to own up to the ugly truth, you’re not alone.

Millions of Americans are realizing that the Obama administration is not merely “misguided.” It is actually and consciously anti-American, anti-Semitic, anti-Christian, and broadly anti-Western. Yet , the American public does not yet fully appreciate why and how the administration always finds itself square against everything this country is based on – religious freedom, capitalism, and justice under law.

This series of articles will explain the force and mechanics behind Obama’s anti-American global agenda: the Muslim Brotherhood.

Al-Ikhwan al-Muslimoon: The Root of Today’s Islamic Evil

Founded in 1928, the Muslim Brotherhood (aka, the Society of Muslim Brothers, or Al-Ikhwan al-Muslimoon in Arabic) is an international movement (some would argue an international conspiracy) that seeks to establish a worldwide Islamic State (or Caliphate). When it was created in the late 1920s, the Brotherhood was a contemporary of the Nazi Party of Germany. Indeed, the leader of the Muslim Brotherhood in Palestine, Amin al-Husseini, is considered by some as the man who catalyzed the Holocaust; for it was only after Husseini visited Hitler in Berlin in 1941 that the systematic extermination of Jews and other minorities began with industrial efficiency.

After the war, despite the insistence by many wartime leaders (Churchill included) that he be brought to justice, Husseini escaped to the Middle East. He lived there until his death in the 1970s, serving as a mentor to a young Yasser Arafat. Husseini and the Nazi Party are the connection points between the Holocaust and today’s Middle Eastern genocide.

The Allies conscious failure to arrest and prosecute Husseini haunts us today.

A Terror Hedge against Stalin and Soviet Russia

At the beginning of the Cold War, working with former Nazis, the American CIA began to court the Muslim Brotherhood as an ally against Soviet Russia. This calculus may have made sense when facing down Josef Stalin, a totalitarian tyrant hell-bent on world domination, but it has proved a costly strategy in the long run.

In the years and decades that followed World War II, the Muslim Brotherhood has evolved into a modern day Nazi International, not unlike the old Comintern (Communist International). It has a vast network of financial and business interests across the world; it has agents, supporters, and apologists within western governments; and it has a support network of “civic” organizations in the West.

These all serve as a cover for its darker and insatiably violent ambitions.

For despite all their intrigue and political gamesmanship, the Muslim Brotherhood is not strictly a political movement, nor a financial cabal. It’s also the mothership of virtually all Islamic terrorist groups operating in the world today, including Al Qaeda, ISIS, Hamas, the Taliban, Boko Haram, and many more. Such groups, all children of the Muslim Brotherhood’s fanatical Islamic ideology, are today ethnically cleansing countries such as Libya, Syria, Iraq, and Nigeria of all traces of Christianity. No less than the President of Egypt, Muslim Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, a devout Muslim, has said as much.

Considering how the Muslim Brotherhood and their terrorist pawns treat fellow Muslims in Egypt, Libya, Syria, and Iraq, butchering them by the bushel including women and children, it should come as no surprise that Egypt and Saudi Arabia have declared the them a “terrorist” organization.

It should also come as no surprise that the United Arab Emirates has designated Muslim Brotherhood front groups operating in the United States “terrorist” entities. In November, the UAE effectively declared that the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and Muslim-American Society (MAS) were no different than Al Qaeda. Why? It’s because they share a common origin in the Muslim Brotherhood. One could add to this list of domestic terrorist collaborators and enablers the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC), and the Muslim Students Association (MSA).

A New HQ in America

Equally alarmingly, all-American institutions such as Georgetown University and the Brookings Institution have accepted so much money from the Muslim Brotherhood government in Qatar, that their political positions are virtually indistinguishable from the Muslim Brotherhood’s domestic front groups!

Yet, the United States government does not see these organizations and their employees as the enemy, as apologists for the worst kinds of barbarity. In fact, the highest profile people from these organizations advise the Obama administration, including the Department of Justice, the Department of Homeland Security, the FBI, and the National Security Council. In January, the Department of State actually welcomed the Muslim Brotherhood to a meeting, and shortly thereafter Egypt exploded in jihadi violence. This is no magical coincidence.

To the detriment of our safety and well-being, the domestic Muslim Brotherhood front groups help dictate counterterrorism policies. It is their influence which leads to the farcical idea, recently expressed by Obama at the National Prayer Breakfast, that the Crusades have something to do with ISIS and the mass murder of innocents in the Middle East today.

These front groups shape our foreign policy, which since the Arab Spring and continuing to this day is on the side of the Muslim Brotherhood.

So-called “moderate Muslims” employed at these front groups have made the country of Qatar, a totalitarian sharia-based society, and an “ATM for terrorists,” the closest ally of the United States under Obama’s Presidency. With enthusiasm from Obama and Eric Holder, they have us emptying Guantanamo Bay of the most vicious killers and sending them to Qatar, with only the vaguest of security assurances.

The remaining four articles will explore the influence of the Muslim Brotherhood on American policy, both foreign and domestic (including in Common Core, Obama’s position on illegal immigration and amnesty, and the hostility of the administration toward police officers). The exposé will also detail the operatives in the government who work to advance the Muslim Brotherhood’s ambitions for a worldwide Caliphate. And it will put into context the mysterious influence that George Soros and Valerie Jarrett have over Barack Hussein Obama, his administration, and the policies that affect every American.

 

The Betrayal Papers is a collaborative effort by the Coalition of Concerned Citizens, which includes: Andrea Shea King, Dr. Ashraf Ramelah, Benjamin Smith, Brent Parrish, Charles Ortel, Denise Simon, Dick Manasseri, Gary Kubiak, Gates of Vienna, IQ al Rassooli, Jeff Bayard, Leslie Burt, Marcus Kohan, General Paul E. Vallely, Regina Thomson, Scott Smith, Terresa Monroe-Hamilton, Colonel Thomas Snodgrass, Trever Loudon, Wallace Bruschweiler, and William Palumbo.

26 States Temporarily Win on DAPA, Immigration

AUSTIN – A federal judge late Monday halted President Barack Obama’s landmark immigration order on the eve of its implementation, denying millions of people illegally in America access to work permits and dealing a victory to Gov. Greg Abbott in his lawsuit against the program.

The decision from Judge Andrew Hanen, based in Brownsville, did not declare the executive action unconstitutional but said it should not take effect until the legal questions have been settled.

“Once these services are provided,” Hanen wrote in a 123-page ruling, “there will be no effective way of putting the toothpaste back in the tube should the plaintiffs ultimately prevail.”

Immigration activists had been bracing for an unfavorable decision from Hanen, an appointee of former President George W. Bush to the Southern District of Texas. He previously has expressed skepticism at the federal government’s ability to enforce the law at the border.

The White House cast the ruling as a temporary set-back.

“The Supreme Court and Congress have made clear that the federal government can set priorities in enforcing our immigration laws—which is exactly what the President did when he announced commonsense policies to help fix our broken immigration system,” according to a statement.

The administration is expected to appeal the decision to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans.

Still, Texas Republicans late Monday night cheered the ruling as a clear rebuttal of Obama’s policy.

Attorney General Ken Paxton called it a “crucial first step in reining in President Obama’s lawlessness,” and Abbott said it “rightly stops the president’s overreach in its tracks.”

“We live in a nation governed by a system of checks and balances, and the president’s attempt to by-pass the will of the American people was successfully checked today,” Abbott said in a statement.

Led by Abbott, Texas and 25 other states had argued that Obama unconstitutionally sidestepped Congress when he took executive action last November to shield from deportation up to 5 million immigrants in the country illegally.

That number included an estimated 170,000 in Harris County, about a third of all such immigrants in the region, and more than half a million in other parts of Texas, according to an analysis of U.S. Census data.

The states argued they will have to pay the costs of providing services to those here illegally.

Texas led a 17-state coalition when Abbott filed the lawsuit last December while serving as the state’s attorney general. The number of states that have signed on to the challenge has since grown to 26.

The Obama administration defended the move as within the president’s authority and consistent with other actions taken by presidents of both parties.

Hanen’s ruling arrived two days before U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services was set to start accepting applications for the program.

It also came as Congress is debating how to fund the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, which oversees immigration laws. The decision could give Republicans some leverage in that fight.

Democrats expressed optimism about an appeal but said even a temporary delay in providing work permits would hurt people who had done nothing wrong.

“We are talking about Texas students who know no other country but the United States, and parents of U.S. citizen children,” said state Rep. Armando Walle, D-Houston. “These children pledge allegiance every day in school to the U.S. and Texas flags.”

THE HOUSE HAS DONE IT’S JOB, NOW CALL YOUR SENATOR AND ASK THEM TO STAND WITH SENATOR SESSIONS.

*** It appears there are lots of machinations in the background such that the appeal process by the government may not go well either and further this put the Democrats in a precarious position funding the DHS departments controlling DAPA as well as all the NGO’s that have stood shoulder to shoulder with the WH on immigration.

As Republicans work to overcome a Democratic filibuster of a House-passed Department of Homeland Security bill that blocks President Barack Obama’s executive amnesty, Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) is highlighting the Obama administration’s long history of dismantling immigration laws.

In a lengthy timeline released Monday, Sessions — the chairman of the Subcommittee on Immigration and the National Interest — lists every instance of the Obama administration ignoring, rewriting, delaying and breaking the nation’s immigration laws.

The timeline begins in January 2009 with the administration ending worksite enforcement actions and, 50 pages later, ends on February 13, 2015 with the House Judiciary Committee’s revelation that the administration included a “sneaky” avenue for illegal immigrants granted deferred status to be placed on a pathway to citizenship.

Sessions’ list comes at a pivotal point in Republicans’ fight to preserve the nation’s immigration laws. In November, after the midterm elections, Obama announced he would provide unilateral amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants.

In January, House Republicans passed a Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill that also blocked Obama’s executive amnesty. In the Senate, however, Democrats — including those who said they were opposed to the president’s unilateral actions — have blocked debate on the legislation.

Funding for the department expires on February 27 and the path forward remains hazy with Republicans considering ways to break the filibuster.

The release of Session’s timeline comes less than two weeks before DHS funding expires and a less than a year after he released an earlier edition in May 2014. Since May the timetable has seen nearly 100 more additions.

See the full timetable:

Timeline: How the Obama Administration Bypassed Congress to Dismantle Immigration Enforcement

In September 2011, President Obama said, “We live in a democracy. You have to pass bills through the legislature, and then I can sign it.” Yet, since that time, and indeed before then, he has systematically voided existing laws and unilaterally created new measures that Congress has refused to adopt under either Democratic or Republican control.

Most recently, the President announced he would do what he once said only an “emperor” could do – grant unilateral amnesty, work permits, and access to government benefits to more than five million illegal immigrants. This unprecedented action, combined with new “enforcement priorities” for Department of Homeland Security personnel that exempt the vast majority of illegal immigrants from the threat of removal, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals directive, the “Morton” memos, and numerous other lesser-reported but far-reaching Executive actions, has threatened not only our constitutional system, but our national sovereignty. Indeed, the idea of national, sovereign borders is being daily eviscerated by the President’s determination to write his own immigration rules in defiance of Congress and the American people.

Below is a detailed timeline of how the Obama Administration systematically dismantled immigration enforcement, undermining the very rule of law upon which our nation was founded and upon which its greatness depends.

January 2009:  Obama Administration Ends Worksite Enforcement Actions

In early 2009, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) executes a raid (initiated and planned under the Bush Administration) on an engine machine shop in Bellingham, Washington, detaining 28 illegal immigrants who were using fake Social Security numbers and identity documents. Shortly thereafter, pro-amnesty groups criticized the Administration for enforcing the law. An unnamed DHS official is quoted in the Washington Times as saying, “the Secretary is not happy about it and this is not her policy.”  Instead of enforcing the law, the Secretary investigates the ICE agents for simply doing their duty. Esther Olavarria, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security, says on a call with employers and pro-amnesty groups that “we’re not doing raids or audits under this administration.”

January 29, 2009:  Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano Delays E-Verify Deadline 

Former Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano delays the original deadlines for federal contractors to use the E-Verify system, from January 15, 2009, and February 20, 2009, to May 21, 2009.

April 16, 2009:  Secretary Napolitano Delays E-Verify Deadline a Second Time 

Secretary Napolitano again delays the deadline for federal contractors to use E-Verify, this time to June 30, 2009.

June 3, 2009:  Secretary Napolitano Delays E-Verify Deadline a Third Time 

For the third time, Secretary Napolitano delays the deadline for federal contractors to use E-Verify to September 8, 2009.

March 8, 2010:  ICE Inflates Deportation Statistics

According to the Washington Post:  “Months after reporting that the number of illegal immigrants removed by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement increased 47 percent during President Obama’s first year in office, the Department of Homeland Security on Monday corrected the record, saying the actual increase in those deported and ‘voluntary departures’ was 5 percent.”

March 16, 2010:  DHS Announces Termination of Funding for Virtual Fence along Southwestern Border 

Secretary Napolitano announces that, effective immediately, DHS would redeploy $50 million of stimulus funding originally allocated for virtual fence technology because “the system of sensors and cameras along the Southwest border known as SBInet has been plagued with cost overruns and missed deadlines.”

May 19, 2010:  ICE Director John Morton Announces Termination of Cooperation with Arizona Law Enforcement

In an interview with the Chicago Tribune, the former Director of ICE, John Morton, states that ICE will not even process or accept illegal immigrants transferred to ICE custody by Arizona law enforcement, largely because the Obama Administration disagrees with Arizona’s immigration law, which made it a crime to be in the state illegally and required police to check suspects for immigration documents.

May 27, 2010:  Internal ICE Emails Reveal Relaxed Security and New Benefits for Detained Illegal Immigrants

Internal ICE emails reveal that “low-risk” immigration detainees will be able to have visitors stay for an unlimited amount of time during a 12-hour window, be given access to unmonitored phone lines, email, free internet calling, movie nights, bingo, arts and crafts, dance and cooking classes, tutoring, and computer training.

June 18, 2010:  Obama Administration Sues Arizona over Immigration Enforcement Law

The Obama Administration announces that it will sue Arizona to block the implementation of the state’s immigration enforcement law.

June 25, 2010:  ICE Union Casts Unanimous Vote of “No Confidence” in Agency Leadership

The National ICE Council, the union representing more than 7,000 agents and officers, casts a unanimous vote of “No Confidence” in ICE Director Morton and Assistant Director Phyllis Coven, citing “the growing dissatisfaction and concern among ICE employees and Union Leaders that Director Morton and Assistant Director Coven have abandoned the Agency’s core mission of enforcing United States Immigration Laws and providing for public safety, and have instead directed their attention to campaigning for programs and policies related to amnesty.” The union lists some of the policies that led to the vote of No Confidence:

“Senior ICE leadership dedicates more time to campaigning for immigration reforms aimed at large scale amnesty legislation, than advising the American public and Federal lawmakers on the severity of the illegal immigration problem . . . ICE [Enforcement and Removal Operations are] currently overwhelmed by the massive criminal alien problem in the United States resulting in the large-scale release of criminals back into local communities.”

“Criminal aliens openly brag to ICE officers that they are taking advantage of the broken immigration system and will be back in the United States within days to commit crimes, while United States citizens arrested for the same offenses serve prison sentences. . . . Thousands of other criminal aliens are released to ICE without being tried for their criminal charges. ICE senior leadership is aware that the system is broken, yet refuses to alert Congress to the severity of the situation . . . .”

“ICE is misleading the American public with regard to the effectiveness of criminal enforcement programs like the ICE ‘Secure Communities Program’ using it as a selling point to move forward with amnesty related legislation.”

“While ICE reports internally that more than 90 percent of ICE detainees are first encountered by ICE in jails after they are arrested by local police for criminal charges, ICE senior leadership misrepresents this information publicly in order to portray ICE detainees as being non-criminal in nature to support the Administration’s position on amnesty and relaxed security at ICE detention facilities.”

“The majority of ICE ERO Officers are prohibited from making street arrests or enforcing United States immigration laws outside of the institutional (jail) setting. This has effectively created ‘amnesty through policy’ for anyone illegally in the United States who has not been arrested by another agency for a criminal violation.”

“ICE Detention Reforms have transformed into a detention system aimed at providing resort like living conditions to criminal aliens. Senior ICE leadership excluded ICE officers and field managers (the technical experts on ICE detention) from the development of these reforms, and instead solicited recommendations from special interest groups. . . . Unlike any other agency in the nation, ICE officers will be prevented from searching detainees housed in ICE facilities allowing weapons, drugs and other contraband into detention centers putting detainees, ICE officers and contract guards at risk.”

July 14, 2010:  Obama Administration Ignores Dangerous Sanctuary City Policies 

Less than a week after suing Arizona to block its immigration law, the Department of Justice announces that it will not take legal action against sanctuary cities, with a spokeswoman stating:  “There is a big difference between a state or locality saying they are not going to use their resources to enforce a federal law, as so-called sanctuary cities have done, and a state passing its own immigration policy that actively interferes with federal law.”

July 30, 2010:  Leaked U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Memo Reveals Obama Backdoor Amnesty Plan 

A leaked USCIS memo to agency Director Alejandro Mayorkas details the Obama administration’s plan to bypass Congress and grant amnesty by executive fiat. The memo, entitled “Administrative Alternatives to Comprehensive Immigration Reform,” suggests a number of unilateral actions to “reduce the threat of removal for certain individuals present in the United States without authorization” and “extend benefits and/or protections to many individuals and groups,” including many that Obama has since implemented and many that appeared in the Senate comprehensive immigration bill (S. 744, 113th Congress).

August 2010:  ICE Memo Stops Agents from Detaining Illegal Immigrants During Traffic Stops 

In August 2010, ICE begins internally circulating a draft policy that would significantly limit the circumstances under which ICE could detain illegal immigrants. In effect, ICE agents are no longer authorized to stop/detain an illegal immigrant for illegally entering the country or for possessing false identification documents. Now, illegal immigrants can be detained only if another law enforcement agency makes an arrest for a criminal violation.

August 24, 2010:  DHS Begins Closing and Dismissing Deportation Cases 

The Houston Chronicle reports that DHS has begun “systematically reviewing thousands of pending immigration cases and moving to dismiss those filed against suspected illegal immigrants without serious criminal records.”

September 8, 2010:  Obama Administration Files Supreme Court Brief Supporting Challenge to Arizona’s E-Verify Law

The Obama Administration argues that the Supreme Court should strike down Arizona’s 2007 E-Verify law—a law enacted by the state’s former Governor, and the current Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano. The law required all employers in the state to use E-Verify and revoked business licenses of those who hired illegal workers. The Supreme Court upholds the law in May 2011, finding that it was not preempted, because “although Congress had made the program voluntary at the national level, it had expressed no intent to prevent States from mandating participation.”

September 16, 2010:  Leaked DHS Memo Reveals President Obama’s Long-Term Plan to Circumvent Congress and Grant “Broad Based” Amnesty

A leaked 10-page memo, dated February 26, 2010, details how the Obama administration had “long envisioned” a two-phase “broad based” amnesty plan “legalizing those who qualify and intend to stay here.” The memo states that “during Phase 1, eligible applicants would be registered, fingerprinted, screened and considered for an interim status that allows them to work in the U.S. . . . During Phase 2, applicants who had fulfilled additional statutory requirements would be permitted to become lawful permanent residents [i.e., obtain green cards].” The memo asserts that the Administration could proceed “in the absence of legislation,” e.g., deferred action; deferred enforced departure; waiver of inadmissibility for certain illegal immigrants; parole-in-place. Remarkably, the memo contemplates the pros and cons of such unprecedented executive action:

“A registration program can be messaged as a security measure to bring illegal immigrants out of the shadows.”

“A bold administrative program would transform the political landscape by using administrative measures to sidestep the current state of Congressional gridlock and inertia.”

“The Secretary would face criticism that she is abdicating her charge to enforce the immigration laws. Internal complaints of this type from career DHS officers are likely and may also be used in the press to bolster criticism.”

“Even many who have supported a legislated legalization program may question the legitimacy of trying to accomplish the same end via administrative action, particularly after five years where the two parties have treated this as a matter to be decided in Congress.”

“A program that reaches the entire population targeted for legalization would represent use of deferred action far beyond its limited class-based uses in the past (e.g. for widows). Congress may react by amending the statute to bar or greatly trim back on deferred action authority, blocking its use even for its highly important current uses in limited cases.”

“Congress could also simply negate the grant of deferred action (which by its nature is temporary and revocable) to this population. If criticism about the legitimacy of the program gain[s] traction, many supporters of legalization may find it hard to vote against such a bill.”

“The proposed timeline would require a rapid expansion of USCIS’s current application intake capacity. Significant upfront resources would be needed for hiring, training, facilities expansion and technology acquisition, and the only realistic prospect of a source of funding may be a new appropriation.”

“Immigration reform is a lightning rod that many Members of Congress would rather avoid. An administrative solution could dampen future efforts for comprehensive reform and sideline the issue in Congress indefinitely.”

“Done right, a combination of benefit and enforcement-related administrative measures could provide the Administration with a clear-cut political win. If the Administration loses control of the message, however, an aggressive administrative proposal carries significant political risk.”

“More ambitious measures would have to be carefully timed. We would need to give the legislative process enough time to play out to deflect against charges of usurping congressional authority. . . . This is likely to mean that the right time for administrative action will be late summer or fall [2010]—when the midterm election is in full-swing.”

“The President could make the case that the nation’s economic and national security can wait no longer for Congress. Administrative action is necessary to restores [sic] rule of law by ending illegal hiring, requiring individuals who are unlawfully present to pass background checks or get deported, and guaranteeing that all employers and workers are paying their fair share of taxes. Clearing backlogs of family-based visas would be an added bonus.”

“If the American public reacts poorly to an administrative registration effort, Congress could be motivated to enact legislation tying the Administration’s hands. This could result, in the worst case scenario, in legislation that diminishes the Secretary’s discretion to use parole or deferred action in other contexts. A heated fight could also poison the atmosphere for any future legislative reform effort.”

October 17, 2010:  DHS Dismissals of Deportation Cases Up 700 Percent 

The Houston Chronicle reports that the government dismissed, on its own motion, hundreds of deportation cases—up 700 percent between July and August 2010. The article states that “government attorneys in Houston were instructed to exercise prosecutorial discretion on a case-by-case basis for illegal immigrants who have lived in the U.S. for at least two years and have no serious criminal history.”

December 2010:  Internal ICE Emails Reveal Padded Deportation Statistics

On October 8, 2010, Secretary Napolitano and ICE Director Morton announced that in 2010, ICE had “removed more illegal aliens than in any other period in the history of our nation.” On December 6, 2010, however, the Washington Post reports that internal ICE emails show that ICE padded its deportation statistics by including 19,422 removals from the previous fiscal year. The article also describes how ICE extended a Mexican repatriation program beyond its normal operation dates, adding 6,500 to its final removal numbers.

February 15, 2011:  DHS Ignores Mandate to Maintain Operational Control of Border

During a hearing before the House Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security, Chair Candice Miller announces that, according to the Government Accountability Office (GAO), U.S. Customs and Border Protection maintains operational control of only 69 of the roughly 4,000 miles along the northern border and only 873 of the almost 2,000 miles along the southwestern border. Under the Secure Fence Act of 2006, Congress required DHS to achieve and maintain operational control, which is defined as “the prevention of all unlawful entries into the United States, including entries by terrorists, other unlawful aliens, instruments of terrorism, narcotics, and other contraband.”

March 2, 2011:  Morton Amnesty Memo #1 

In the first of a series of memos, ICE Director Morton outlines new enforcement “priorities”—convicted criminals, terrorists, gang members, recent illegal entrants, and fugitives. The memo encourages ICE employees to exercise prosecutorial discretion for illegal immigrants who do not meet these “priorities,” and directs ICE field office directors to not “expend detention resources” on certain illegal immigrants.

March 30, 2011:  9/11 Commission Chair Warns that Obama Administration’s Delay of Implementation of Biometric Exit System and REAL ID Act Risk National Security

Testifying before the Senate Homeland Security Committee, 9/11 Commission Chairman Thomas Kean warns that “border security remains a top national security priority, because there is an indisputable nexus between terrorist operations and terrorist travel. Foreign-born terrorists have continued to exploit our border vulnerabilities to gain access to the United States.” In his testimony, he highlights two programs that the Obama Administration has delayed:

“[F]ull deployment of the biometric exit component of US-VISIT should be a high priority. If law enforcement and intelligence officials had known for certain in August and September 2001 that 9/11 hijackers Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar remained in the U.S., the search for them might have taken on greater urgency.”

. . .

“[N]o further delay [in compliance with the REAL ID Act] should be authorized, rather compliance should be accelerated.”

May 10, 2011:  President Obama Declares Border Secure and Border Fence “Basically Complete”

In a speech in El Paso, Texas, Obama claims that his administration has “strengthened border security beyond what many believed was possible” and that the border fence “is now basically complete,” despite the fact that only 33.7 miles of the 700 miles of fence mandated by the Secure Fence Act of 2006 had been completed by that time. Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee Michael McCaul responds, stating “the border is not secure and it has never been more violent or dangerous. Anyone who lives down there will tell you that.”

June 1, 2011:  Obama Administration Ignores New York’s Refusal to Cooperate with Federal Immigration Agents

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo announces he is suspending New York’s participation in the Secure Communities program, which allows law enforcement agencies to run the fingerprints of those arrested against immigration databases, because of “its impact on families, immigrant communities and law enforcement in New York.” The Obama Administration takes no action.

June 17, 2011:  Morton Amnesty Memos #2 and #3 

ICE Director Morton issues a second memo further directing ICE agents not to enforce the law against certain segments of the illegal immigrant population, including those who would qualify for the DREAM Act, despite having no legal authority to do so and despite the fact that Congress had explicitly rejected the legislation three times. On the same day, Morton also issues a third memo instructing ICE personnel to refrain from enforcing the law against individuals engaging in “protected activity” related to civil or other rights (for example, union organizing or complaining to authorities about employment discrimination or housing conditions).

June 23, 2011:  ICE Union Outraged Over Morton Amnesty Memos 

The ICE union issues a press release expressing outrage over Director Morton’s actions, stating:  “Unable to pass its immigration agenda through legislation, the Administration is now implementing it through agency policy.” The release further states that ICE leadership and the Administration “have excluded our union and our agents from the entire process of developing policies, it was all kept secret from us, we found out from the newspapers. ICE [leadership] worked hand-in-hand with immigrants rights groups, but excluded its own officers.” Describing ICE policy as a “law enforcement nightmare,” union president Chris Crane states “the result is a means for every person here illegally to avoid arrest or detention, as officers we will never know who we can or cannot arrest.” The release concludes:  “we are asking everyone to please email or call your Congressman and Senators immediately and ask them to help stop what’s happening at ICE, we desperately need your help.”

June 27, 2011:  DHS Cover-Up of Backdoor Amnesty Policy Revealed 

The Houston Chronicle reports that internal ICE emails and memos show that DHS “officials misled the public and Congress in an effort to downplay a wave of immigration case dismissals in Houston and other cities that they had created a ‘back-door amnesty.’” These internal emails and memos revealed that this backdoor amnesty was instituted and encouraged at the direction of top ICE officials, including Riah Ramlogan, a high-ranking attorney at ICE subsequently named in a lawsuit by an award-winning ICE attorney in November 2014. In one instance, DHS Assistant Secretary for Legislative Affairs Nelson Peacock wrote a letter to several members of the Senate Judiciary Committee denying the existence of a directive “instructing ICE attorneys to seek the dismissals of immigration proceedings involving certain classes of criminal aliens”—a directive which not only existed, but had been praised by senior ICE officials.

August 1, 2011:  Obama Administration Sues Alabama over Immigration Enforcement Law

The Obama Administration files a lawsuit to block implementation of Alabama’s immigration enforcement law, which authorizes state law enforcement to act when they reasonably suspect individuals are violating federal immigration laws.

August 18, 2011:  Obama Administration Begins Review of Deportation Cases for Purposes of Granting Executive Amnesty 

In a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Secretary Napolitano announces that the Obama Administration had begun a review of all pending and incoming deportation cases and will stop proceedings against those illegal immigrants who do not meet administration “priorities.”

September 2, 2011:  Treasury Inspector General Reports Government Paying Billions in Tax Credits to Illegal Immigrants

A report by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) reveals that the IRS paid out a staggering $4.2 billion in refundable tax credits to illegal immigrants via the Additional Child Tax Credit (ACTC) in 2010. The inspector general states:  “Millions of people are seeking this tax credit who, we believe, are not entitled to it. We have made recommendations to the IRS as to how they could address this, and they have not taken sufficient action in our view to solve this problem.” The report further states that “the payment of Federal funds through this tax benefit appears to provide an additional incentive for aliens to enter, reside, and work in the United States without authorization, which contradicts Federal law and policy to remove such incentives.”

September 7, 2011:  Cook County (Chicago), Illinois Board of Commissioners Votes to Ignore Federal Immigration Law

The Cook County Board of Commissioners passes an ordinance directing local law enforcement to refuse ICE detainer requests and access to individuals or County facilities. While ICE Director Morton acknowledges that the ordinance poses a serious threat to public safety and likely violates federal law, the Administration’s only action is to offer to pay Cook County to honor the detainers and to set up a “working group,” both of which the Board rejects. ICE’s Executive Associate Director of Enforcement and Removal Operations says the policy presents a major problem for enforcement efforts and is an “accident waiting to happen.”

In June 2011, Saul Chavez, who had a prior DUI conviction, was driving with a blood-alcohol content of nearly four times the legal limit when he hits and kills 66-year-old William “Dennis” McCann. While attempting to escape, Chavez drove his car over McCann’s body, dragging him 200 yards before a witness stopped his vehicle. Chavez was charged with two felonies, and ICE issued a detainer asking Cook County to hold him until he could be taken into federal custody. But, pursuant to Cook County’s new anti-detainer law, he was released when he posted 10 percent of his $250,000 bail.  He has since disappeared and is believed to have fled the country.

September 28, 2011:  President Obama Admits Deportation Statistics are “Deceptive” 

At a roundtable with amnesty advocates, President Obama admits that his deportation statistics are misleading:  “The statistics are actually a little deceptive because what we’ve been doing is . . . apprehending folks at the borders and sending them back.  That is counted as a deportation, even though they may have only been held for a day or 48 hours.”

October 18, 2011:  Obama Administration Ignores Santa Clara County’s Defiance of Federal Immigration Law 

The Obama Administration refuses to take action when the Santa Clara County, California, Board of Supervisors votes to stop using county funds to honor ICE detainers, except in limited circumstances. Santa Clara County’s failure to cooperate with Secure Communities continues to this day.

In August 2013, illegal immigrant Mario Chavez was arrested after threatening his 6-year-old son with a knife. His wife obtained a protective order but Chavez made bail and was released from jail instead of being held for further investigation by ICE. A month later, Chavez went to his family’s new home where he then stabbed his wife to death. According to San Jose Mercury News, ICE officials “contend they could have kept Chavez off the streets,” but the county’s policy limits access that ICE has to inmates. The official reportedly said, “We’re not asking them to do our job. We’re asking them to let us do our job.”

October 18, 2011:  ICE Continues to Pad Deportation Statistics 

ICE announces its year-end deportation statistics, which it described as “the largest number in the agency’s history.” However, according to the 2010 Yearbook of Immigration Statistics, published by DHS’s Office of Immigration Statistics, ICE is detaining far fewer illegal immigrants than ever before, locating fewer than half the number of deportable aliens in 2010 than it did in 2006.

October 19, 2011:  Obama Administration Ignores Washington, D.C.’s Defiance of Federal Immigration Law 

The Obama Administration refuses to act when District of Columbia Mayor Vincent C. Gray issues an order to prevent local law enforcement from enforcing federal immigration laws. In June 2012, the D.C. Council unanimously votes to further restrict cooperation with ICE, requiring that suspected illegal immigrants can be detained only if they have prior convictions for violent crimes, among other things. According to the Washington Post, a spokeswoman for ICE states that “ICE has not sought to compel compliance through legal proceedings. Jurisdictions that ignore detainers bear the risk of possible public safety risks.”

October 28, 2011:  Obama Administration Stops Routine Border Searches 

According to the Associated Press, Border Patrol field offices nationwide receive orders from DHS headquarters to stop regular inspections at transportation hubs—both at the border and in the interior of the country—such as random stops and investigations of suspicious behavior, and instead act only based on actual intelligence indicating a threat. The article notes that “halting the practice has baffled agents” who said it was “an effective way to catch unlawful immigrants, including smugglers and possible terrorists.” The National Border Patrol Council, the union representing Border Patrol agents, responds to the changes:  “Stated plainly, Border Patrol mangers are increasing the layers of bureaucracy and making it as difficult as possible for Border Patrol agents to conduct their core duties. The only risks being managed by this move are too many apprehensions, negative media attention and complaints generated by immigrant rights groups.”

October 31, 2011:  Obama Administration Sues South Carolina over Immigration Enforcement Law 

The Justice Department files suit against South Carolina, challenging the state’s immigration enforcement law.

November 7, 2011:  USCIS Stops Issuing “Notices to Appear” in Immigration Court for “Non-Priority” Deportation Cases

Following ICE’s lead, USCIS Director Mayorkas issues a new Policy Memorandum stating that USCIS will no longer issue place illegal immigrants into removal proceedings by issuing “Notices to Appear” in immigration court for illegal immigrants who do not meet the Administration’s deportation “priorities.”

November 17, 2011:  ICE Announces Review of Entire Immigration Court Docket to Close More Deportation Cases

Although it had previously denied the existence of a program involving the dismissal and closure of cases in its Houston office, the ICE Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) issues a new policy memorandum instructing all agency attorneys to “begin a review of incoming cases and cases pending in immigration court” and identify the cases eligible for “prosecutorial discretion in the form of administrative closure,” i.e., executive amnesty.

November 22, 2011:  Obama Administration Sues Utah over Immigration Enforcement Law 

The Obama Administration files a lawsuit to block provisions of Utah’s immigration enforcement law. This is the fourth lawsuit by the Administration against a state that enacted such a law.

November 22, 2011:  Obama Administration Ignores New York City’s Defiance of Federal Immigration Law

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg signs a measure directing city jails to ignore certain requests by ICE to maintain custody of illegal immigrants, so as to give ICE the opportunity to assume custody. To date, the Obama Administration has taken no action against New York City to compel compliance.

December 11, 2011:  Reports Surface that President Obama to Reduce National Guard Presence on Border 

According to several reports, the Obama Administration plans to reduce the 1,200 National Guard troops stationed along the southwestern border. From 2006 to 2008, under the Bush Administration, thousands of troops worked along the border as part of “Operation Jumpstart” to free up Border Patrol to focus on border security. On April 17, 2012, the Obama Administration implements its plan and reduces the number of National Guard to 300; there are currently about 130 stationed on the border.

December 15, 2011:  DHS Rescinds Maricopa County, Arizona’s 287(g) Agreement

DHS rescinds Maricopa County, Arizona’s 287(g) agreement—a cooperative agreement whereby local law enforcement receive training in identifying and apprehending illegal aliens. Director Morton told the Maricopa County Attorney that ICE will no longer respond to calls from the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office involving traffic stops, civil infractions, or “other minor offenses,” even though federal law requires the federal government to respond to inquiries by law enforcement agencies to verify immigration status.

December 29, 2011:  ICE Creates 24-Hour Hotline for Illegal Immigrant Detainees

ICE announces a new 24-hour hotline for illegal immigrant detainees to ensure they “are made aware of their rights.” The hotline is to be staffed by the Law Enforcement Support Center, which ICE previously claimed was too understaffed to respond to local law enforcement trying to verify immigration status. ICE also revises its detainer form to include a new provision that says ICE should “consider this request for a detainer operative only upon the subject’s conviction”—a change in policy that explicitly ignores that illegal presence in the United States is a violation of federal law.

January 5, 2012:  DHS Stops Secure Communities in Alabama in Retaliation for State Immigration Enforcement Law 

In an email from DHS to congressional offices, DHS reveals that it had stopped the roll-out of Secure Communities in Alabama because the Obama Administration disagreed with the state’s immigration enforcement law:  “Although the federal courts have enjoined several parts of H.B. 56, certain provisions were not enjoined and are currently in effect . . . While these provisions of Alabama’s state immigration enforcement law, which conflict with ICE’s immigration enforcement policies and programs, remain the subject of litigation, ICE does not believe it is appropriate to expand deployment of Secure Communities . . . in Alabama.”

January 6, 2012:  USCIS Announces Proposal to Permit Entire Segments of Illegal Immigrant Population to Remain in U.S. 

USCIS announces a proposed rule to allow illegal immigrant relatives of U.S. citizens to apply for waivers to remain in U.S., thereby avoiding the provisions in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) that require them to return to their home countries and apply for a waiver to return to the United States. On January 3, 2013, USCIS issues the final rule.  During a stakeholder call, USCIS Director Mayorkas emphasizes that USCIS will also consider expanding the waiver to illegal immigrant relatives of green card holders and clarifies that even illegal immigrants in deportation proceedings who had their case administratively closed are eligible for these waivers.  On January 24, 2014, USCIS issues field guidance for the program, instructing USCIS officers that an applicant with a criminal history is still eligible for a waiver as long as the offense qualifies as a “petty offense” or “youthful offender” exception under the INA, and is not a crime involving moral turpitude.

January 9, 2012:  DHS Inspector General Reveals Rubberstamping of Immigration Applications 

A report by the DHS Inspector General reveals that USCIS officials pressure employees to approve applications that should have been denied, and that employees believe they do not have enough time to complete interviews of applicants, “leav[ing] ample opportunities for critical information to be overlooked. One [adjudicator] said that an [adjudicator] is likely to ‘grant and just move on,’ rather than use information to make a better determination in certain cases.” Ninety percent of those surveyed felt they did not have enough time to complete interviews of applicants.

January 16, 2012:  ICE Prosecutors Suspend Deportation Proceedings

Due to the immigration court docket review ordered by the OPLA in November 2011, proceedings in immigration courts in Denver and Baltimore are stopped for six weeks. On January 19, 2012, ICE prosecutors recommend the voluntary closure of 1,667 deportation cases. On March 30, 2012, the Administration announces the expansion of the program to Detroit, Seattle, New Orleans, and Orlando, suspending the immigration court dockets in four large cities.

January 19, 2012:  President Obama Uses Executive Order to Eliminate Statutory Requirement for Visa Interviews for Certain Countries

President Obama issues an Executive Order attempting to nullify a longstanding statutory requirement that those applying for a nonimmigrant visa (in a foreign country) submit to an in-person interview with a consular officer. The President’s Executive Order waives these requirements for travelers from China and Brazil, increasing the potential for visa overstays and risking national security and law enforcement threats.

February 7, 2012:  ICE Creates “Public Advocate” for Illegal Immigrants 

ICE announces the creation of the ICE Public Advocate, who is to serve as a point of contact for aliens in removal proceedings, community and advocacy groups, and others who have questions, recommendations, or other issues they would like to raise about the Administration’s enforcement and executive amnesty efforts.

February 13, 2012:  President Obama’s Budget Slashes 287(g) Program

The President’s FY2013 budget proposes a massive cut in funding for ICE and the 287(g) program, effectively gutting it.

April 25, 2012:  ICE Voluntarily Dismisses Over 16,500 Deportation Cases

ICE announces that it will voluntarily close over 16,500 deportation cases in connection with the Obama Administration’s larger review of 300,000 cases. The Administration also announces that the number of illegal immigrants whose deportation cases it has already dismissed is up to 2,700 from just over 1,500 the previous month.

April 25, 2012:  DHS Announces Another Delay of Biometric Exit System 

In March 2012, DHS Principal Deputy Coordinator of Counterterrorism John Cohen had testified before the House Committee on Homeland Security that DHS’s plan to implement the statutorily-required biometric exit system will be completed in the next 30 days. However, on April 25, 2012, Secretary Napolitano testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee that DHS will be able to deploy such a system “within four years” and then only if DHS determines that it is cost-effective. Dating back to 1996, Congress has mandated six times that this system be implemented and the 9/11 Commission recommended that DHS complete this system “as quickly as possible.”

April 27, 2012:  Obama Administration Undermines the Successful Secure Communities Program
ICE announces that it will no longer ask local jails to detain illegal immigrants stopped for “minor traffic offenses,” weakening the effective Secure Communities program. Instead, ICE will consider detaining an alien only if the alien is ultimately convicted of an offense. Also, despite claims of limited resources, ICE announces it plans to take action against jurisdictions with arrest rates the agency deems too high.

June 5, 2012:  ICE Deportation Dismissals Up to 20,000

ICE releases its latest statistics in its review of pending deportation cases. Of the 288,000 reviewed, 20,648 will be dismissed. ICE prosecutors in California also begin reviewing more than 18,000 pending deportation cases.

June 12, 2012:  Obama Administration Sues Florida for its Effort to Remove Ineligible Voters

The Obama Administration files a lawsuit to prevent the State of Florida from removing ineligible voters, including illegal immigrants, from its voter registration rolls. On June 28, 2012, a federal court denies the Administration’s request, largely because Florida had abandoned its efforts, but also holds that a State is not prohibited from removing the names of noncitizens from its voter rolls, even within the 90-day “quiet” period before a federal election.

June 15, 2012:  President Obama Bypasses Congress and Unilaterally Implements His Version of Failed DREAM Act 

President Obama unilaterally implements provisions of the DREAM Act, circumventing Congress under the guise of “prosecutorial discretion.”  By executive fiat, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or “DACA” program grants amnesty and work authorizations to illegal immigrants under the age of 30 who claim they arrived in the country before the age of 16. ICE officers later report that this amnesty is being granted to adult illegal aliens who have been arrested for criminal offenses. In an interview the same day, Secretary Napolitano admits that DHS “internally set it up so that the parents are not referred for immigration enforcement if the young person comes in for deferred action,” thereby further expanding the scope of the non-enforcement directive.

June 25, 2012:  Obama Administration Rescinds Arizona’s 287(g) Agreements in Retaliation for Supreme Court Upholding State Immigration Enforcement Law

Immediately following the Supreme Court’s decision upholding most of Arizona’s immigration enforcement law—which required law enforcement officers to take reasonable steps to verify the immigration status of those lawfully stopped or detained where there is reasonable suspicion to believe they are in the country illegally—the Administration rescinds all of its 287(g) agreements in Arizona.

July 6, 2012:  Obama Administration Announces Closure of Nine Border Patrol Stations

The Obama Administration announces the closure of nine Border Patrol stations throughout the country—Lubbock, Amarillo, Dallas, San Antonio, Abilene, and San Angelo, Texas; Billings, Montana; Twin Falls, Idaho; and Riverside, California. A U.S. Customs and Border Protection spokesman claims it is being done to more effectively use personnel.

August 6, 2012:  Obama Administration Admits It Does Not Enforce Law Designed to Prevent Aliens from Relying on Public Welfare System

The Ranking Members of the Senate Budget, Judiciary, Finance, and Agriculture Committees request information from DHS and the State Department about visa denials after learning that only two of roughly 80 means-tested welfare programs were officially considered when evaluating whether an applicant for admission to the U.S. was likely to become a “public charge,” i.e., dependent on government assistance. Under Section 212 of the INA, an alien who is likely to become a public charge is inadmissible. On February 8, 2013, DHS finally responds that, in 2012, not a single immigrant was identified by the federal government as being a public charge, and that from FY2005 to FY2011, just 9,700 applicants for admission through the Visa Waiver Program out of more than 116 million were denied on public charge grounds. On March 1, 2013, the State Department finally responds with data showing that, in 2011, only 0.0033 percent of net applications for admission to the U.S. were denied on “public charge” grounds.

September 12, 2012:  Obama Administration Admits Aggressive Campaign to Recruit Immigrants to Sign-Up for U.S. Welfare Programs

In response to a request from the Ranking Member of the Senate Budget Committee, then-U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary Tom Vilsack admits that USDA personnel have conducted more than 30 meetings with the Mexican government to encourage non-citizen enrollment in food stamps and 14 other USDA-administered welfare programs. It is later revealed that a pamphlet distributed at Mexican consulates in the U.S. assures non-citizens that food stamp enrollment will not affect their path to citizenship, and that the USDA produced and broadcasted a soap opera-like “radio novela,” the premise of which included pressuring an individual to enroll in food stamps even though she insisted she could subsist without the benefits.

October 4, 2012:  Obama Administration Ignores Los Angeles County’s Defiance of Federal Immigration Laws

The Obama Administration fails to take any action after Los Angeles Police Department Chief Charlie Beck announces that the LAPD will ignore requests by ICE to detain illegal immigrants arrested for “low-level” offenses.

December 21, 2012:  Morton Amnesty Memo #4

On the Friday before the Christmas holiday, ICE Director Morton issues a fourth memo with guidance on implementing executive amnesty, stating that ICE agents can no longer detain illegal immigrants if their only violation of the law is being in the country illegally. ICE agents now may detain only those who have committed a crime independent of their illegal presence, administratively suspending core elements of the INA.

January 22, 2013:  Obama Administration Files Brief in Support of Challenge to Arizona Law Requiring Proof of Citizenship to Vote

The Obama Administration files a brief in Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc., challenging Arizona’s law that requires individuals to provide evidence of U.S. citizenship when registering to vote in federal elections. On June 17, 2013, the Supreme Court holds that although federal law preempts the Arizona law, Arizona can still request that the Elections Assistance Commission (EAC) include state-specific instructions on the federal form and a state may challenge a rejection of that request. Writing for the majority, Justice Scalia notes: “Arizona would have the opportunity to establish in a reviewing court that a mere oath will not suffice to effectuate its citizenship requirement and that the EAC is therefore under a nondiscretionary duty to include Arizona’s concrete-evidence requirement on the Federal form.”

February 14, 2013:  Obama Administration Announces It Has Approved Nearly 200,000 DACA Applications

USCIS releases its latest DACA statistics showing that the Administration has granted deferred action to 199,460 illegal immigrants under the program.

February 26, 2013:  DHS Admits It Has No Metrics for Determining Whether Border Is Secure

GAO releases a report stating that DHS has no official metrics by which to determine whether the border is secure and has no plans to adopt any until late 2013. Since 2004, DHS had used “operational control” as a way to measure border security, and, in 2006, Congress mandated that DHS maintain operational control of the “entire international land and maritime borders of the United States.” After DHS reported in 2010 that it had operational control over only 13 percent of the 8,607 mile northern, southwestern, and coastal border, and only 44 percent operational control of the southwestern border specifically, the Obama Administration abandoned the metric. On March 21, 2013, the New York Times reports that Administration officials admitted that “they had resisted producing a single measure to assess the border because the president did not want any hurdles placed on the pathway to eventual citizenship for immigrants in the country illegally.”

February 2013:  Obama Administration Uses Sequester as Excuse to Release More Than 2,000 Illegal Immigrants—Including Illegal immigrants with Criminal Records—from ICE Custody

After reports surface that ICE had been releasing illegal immigrants in ICE custody due to the sequester, ICE Director Morton testifies before the House Judiciary Committee that ICE had, in fact, released 2,228 illegal immigrant detainees, at least 629 of whom had criminal records, contradicting earlier statements by DHS officials. Morton also admits that ICE had rearrested and brought back four of the most dangerous released detainees. According to the Associated Press, more than 2,000 had been released before the sequester even took effect and the Administration planned to release 3,000 more.  In October 2014, USA Today obtains internal ICE records contradicting the Administration’s assurances to Congress – including by White House spokesman Jay Carney – that those released had only minor criminal records. Morton had testified that none were charged or convicted with murder, rape or sexual abuse of a minor. However, according to the internal ICE documents, those freed had been charged with aggravated kidnapping, sexual assault (including of minors), drug trafficking, homicide, assaulting police officers, and weapons charges.

April 10, 2013:  Border Patrol Chief Testifies Apprehensions Have Increased

Chief of the Border Patrol Michael Fisher testifies before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee that there has been an increase in “attempted entries,” in part due to Congress’ consideration of amnesty.

April 23, 2013:  Federal Court Holds DHS Does Not Have Discretion to Stop Deportations

In Crane v. Napolitano, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas holds that “DHS does not have discretion to refuse to initiate removal proceedings [where the law requires it to do so].” The court also affirms that Congress, and not the President, has the plenary power to set immigration law and that the Obama administration’s non-enforcement policies violate federal law. The lawsuit originated when several ICE agents sued Secretary Napolitano, Director Morton, and Director Mayorkas, arguing that the Administration’s policies cause them to violate their oath of office to enforce the law.

April 24, 2013:  Attorney General Eric Holder Declares Amnesty Is a “Civil Right”

In a speech before the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund, Attorney General Eric Holder declares that amnesty is a “civil right”:  “Creating a pathway to earned citizenship for the 11 million unauthorized immigrants in this country is essential . . . This is a matter of civil and human rights.”

August 23, 2013:  Obama Administration Makes Broad New Category of Illegal Immigrants Eligible for Executive Amnesty

ICE announces a new policy prohibiting its agents from detaining and/or deporting illegal immigrant parents, legal guardians, and “primary caretakers” of minor children.  The policy memo states that ICE personnel “should ensure that the agency’s immigration enforcement activities do not unnecessarily disrupt the parental rights of both alien parents or legal guardians of minor children.” In response, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte states that the new directive “poisons the debate surrounding immigration reform and shows that the Administration is not serious about fixing our broken immigration system.”

October 5, 2013:  Obama Administration Ignores California’s Defiance of Federal Immigration Law

California Governor Jerry Brown signs a law prohibiting state and local law enforcement from detaining illegal immigrants pursuant to an ICE detainer except in certain narrow circumstances. The bill is opposed by the California State Sheriffs Association and the California District Attorneys Association. To date, the Obama Administration has taken no action in response.

November 15, 2013:  Obama Administration Announces More Executive Amnesty

USCIS issues a new Policy Memorandum that employs a dubious interpretation of “parole in place”—a provision of law intended to allow aliens outside the U.S. to come into the country on a temporary and case-by-case basis under certain circumstances for humanitarian reasons at the discretion of the Attorney General. The Administration announces that it will now use this policy to grant a path to citizenship to illegal immigrant immediate relatives of active and veteran members of the U.S. Armed Forces who are already inside the country.

November 30, 2013:  Obama Administration Has Approved Over 500,000 DACA Applications

According information provided to congressional offices from USCIS, as of November 30, 2013, USCIS has received a total of 627,763 requests for DACA. Of the total, 509,926, or 81 percent, have been approved, while only 14,614, or 2 percent have been denied.

December 13, 2013:  Federal Court Rebukes DHS for Aiding Smugglers in Violating U.S. Laws

U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Texas, Andrew S. Hanen, issues an order stating:  “This Court is quite concerned with the apparent policy of the Department of Homeland Security of completing the criminal mission of individuals who are violating the border security of the United States.” Judge Hanen details the practice of DHS immigration agents assisting human traffickers deliver illegal immigrants to their relatives in the United States—including relatives who are themselves illegal immigrants.

January 24, 2014:  New DHS Secretary, Jeh Johnson, Declares Illegal Immigrants Have “Earned the Right” to Become U.S. Citizens

In a speech to the U.S. Conference of Mayors, newly sworn-in DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson endorses a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants and states:  “It is also, frankly, in my judgment, a matter of who we are as Americans to offer those who want to be citizens, who’ve earned the right to be citizens . . . to have the opportunity that we all have to try to become American citizens.”

February 5, 2014:  Obama Administration Unilaterally Changes Federal Law Prohibiting Admission of Terrorists to U.S.

The Departments of Homeland Security and State publish new regulations to narrow a ban in the INA prohibiting individuals who had provided “limited” material support to terrorists from entering the country. The regulations would excuse activities such as:

committing or inciting to commit, under circumstances indicating an intention to cause death or serious bodily injury, a terrorist activity;

preparing or planning a terrorist activity;

gathering information on potential targets for terrorist activity;

soliciting funds or other things of value for terrorist activity;

committing an act that the actor knows, or reasonably should know, affords material support, including a safe house, transportation, communications, funds, transfer of funds or other material financial benefit, false documentation or identification, weapons (including chemical, biological, or radiological weapons), explosives, or training for the commission of a terrorist activity.

Under the new administration policy, such individuals would be permitted not only to enter the country, but to apply for any immigration benefit, including permanent resident status.

February 8, 2014:  Obama Administration Diverts Resources to DACA Applications, Tripling Wait Times for Legal Immigrants

According to a report in the New York Times citing “administration officials and official data,” USCIS has diverted personnel and resources to processing DACA applications, tripling wait times for U.S. citizens petitioning for green cards for immediate relatives.  According to the report, “waits for approvals for those resident visas stretched to 15 months, and more than 500,000 applications became stuck in the pipeline, playing havoc with international moves and children’s schools and keeping families apart.”

February 11, 2014:  DHS Inspector General Audit Reveals Decline in Worksite Enforcement

According to a report by the DHS Inspector General, from 2009 to 2012, the Obama Administration systematically reduced fines levied against employers found in violation of the INA for employing illegal immigrants. The report states fines were reduced an average of 40 percent from $52.7 million to $31.2 million, and that of 1,174 final orders, 68 percent were reduced, 28 percent by more than half. The Inspector General states that such significant reductions “may diminish the effectiveness of fines as a deterrent to hiring unauthorized workers.”

March 4, 2014:  President Obama’s Annual Budget Request Cuts Enforcement Funding

President Obama’s FY2015 budget request proposes reducing overall funding for ICE by 4.5 percent, maintaining fewer detention beds, increasing alternatives to detention, and eliminating funding for the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP). His introductory budget message calls on Congress to pass amnesty.

March 12, 2014:  DHS Secretary Admits that Obama Administration Manipulates Deportation Statistics 

Testifying before the House Appropriations Homeland Security Subcommittee, Secretary Johnson admits that more than half of the 368,000 deportations reported by ICE for fiscal year 2013—touted as a record number of deportations—were actually due to arrests by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and would not have counted toward ICE’s removal totals under previous administrations.

March 13, 2014:  President Obama Announces Review of DHS Enforcement Practices

The President meets with Congressional Hispanic Caucus Leadership to discuss “their mutual efforts to pass commonsense immigration reform legislation through the House of Representatives this year.” A White House readout of the meeting notes that the President announced to those in attendance that he has directed Secretary Johnson to “do an inventory of the Department’s current practices to see how it can conduct enforcement more humanely within the confines of the law.”

March 26, 2014:  Analysis of DHS Deportation Data Reveals Far-Reaching Defiance of Immigration Laws

According to ICE’s published data on 2013 removals, 98 percent of all removals met one of the agency’s “enforcement priorities”:  individuals who have been convicted of a serious criminal offense; those apprehended in the act of crossing the border; those who have been previously deported; and fugitives from the law. The first two categories—border apprehensions (which are not deportations as commonly understood) and convicted criminals—accounted for 94 percent of the 368,000 removals.  Less than 0.2 percent of the approximately 12 million illegal immigrants and visa overstays who did not have a serious criminal conviction were placed into removal proceedings; only .08 percent of the approximately 12 million were placed into removal proceedings who were neither convicted of a serious crime nor a repeat immigration violator. While there is no published tally of the .08 percent, reports from ICE officers indicate that these individuals likely had other security red flags on their records. Regardless, over 99 percent of illegal immigrants and visa overstays without known criminal records did not face removal.

March 26, 2014:  Obama Administration Releases Illegal Immigrants into Texas to Ease Overcrowded Detention Centers

Texas television station KRGV reports instances of women and minors claiming to have been recently released from immigration officials with “documents that allow [them] to travel anywhere in the United States.” The report claims that most individuals interviewed and released were of Central and South American origins other than Mexico.

March 31, 2014:  New Report Reveals ICE Released 68,000 Convicted Criminals in 2013

A report released by the Center for Immigration Studies based on internal ICE data reveals that in 2013, ICE charged only 195,000, or 25 percent, out of 722,000 potentially deportable aliens they encountered, and released convicted criminal aliens 68,000 times. According to the data, more than 870,000 aliens who have been ordered removed remain in the country.

April 2, 2014:  CBP Commissioner Testifies Administration Policies Contribute to Recent Border Surge

On April 2, 2014, CBP Commissioner Gil Kerlikowske testifies before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security that Obama Administration polices—“deferred action, the family reunification, is an issue”—contributed to the recent border surge of unaccompanied alien minors and adults.

May 6, 2014:  Obama Administration Unilaterally Expands Guest Worker Admissions

DHS announces the publication of two proposed rules to give employment authorization to the spouses of certain H-1B workers, providing nearly 100,000 additional guest worker permits immediately and approximately 30,000 each year thereafter, and to loosen restrictions on other high-skill foreign workers. Meanwhile, the U.S. Census Bureau reported that majority of U.S. citizens with Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) degrees do not work in STEM occupations.

May 8, 2014:  Obama Administration Revises Education Guidance Requiring “Equal Access” To Public Schools for Illegal Immigrants

Circumventing formal rulemaking processes that allow for public comment, the Departments of Justice and Education send a “Dear Colleague” letter to every public school district in the country regarding acceptable forms of student identification for illegal immigrants. The letter states that schools should not require commonly accepted forms of identification, such as “immigration papers,” Social Security numbers, a parent’s driver’s license, or state-issued identification, to establish residency in a district because illegal immigrants are less likely to have such identification and requiring such information could have a “chilling effect” on enrollment.

May 12, 2014:  Report Reveals ICE Released 36,007 Criminal Illegal Immigrants in 2013 

According to a report by the Center for Immigration Studies based on internal ICE data, ICE released 36,007 criminal illegal immigrants into U.S. communities in 2013 alone. These criminals had 88,000 convictions, including 193 homicide convictions, 426 sexual assault convictions, 303 kidnapping convictions, 9,187 dangerous drug convictions, and 16,070 drunk or drugged driving convictions.

May 28, 2014:  Obama Administration Announces Plan to Bypass Congress to Permit DACA Recipients to Enlist in Military

According to a report in the New York Times, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel sent a letter to a group of Senators stating that he had “taken initial action to allow for the enlistment” of DACA recipients, creating an expedited pathway to citizenship in as little as three months. The plan would permit the individuals to apply under the Military Accessions Vital to the National Interest (MAVNI) program, which currently allows legal immigrants with temporary visas to enlist if they have certain skills or speak certain languages.  Shortly thereafter, the President requests that the plan be delayed until August to give House Republicans a chance to pass amnesty legislation.

May 30, 2014:  Memo from Deputy Chief of U.S. Border Patrol Reveals Border Surge Incentivized by Obama Policies

A draft internal memorandum by Deputy Chief of the Border Patrol Ronald Vitiello warns the National Security Council’s trans-border security directorate that the border surge is worse than the Administration previously acknowledged and is “compromising” the government’s ability to combat other border threats.  Vitiello states:

“Releasing other than Mexican family units, credible fear claims, and low-threat aliens on their own recognizance, along with facilitating family reunification of UAC in lieu of repatriation to their country of citizenship, serve as incentives for additional individuals to follow the same path. To stem the flow, adequate consequences must be delivered for illegal entry into the US and for facilitating human smuggling, either as a direct member of an illicit alien smuggling organization or as a private facilitator.  These consequences must be delivered both at the border and within the interior US, e.g. through expanded ICE Homeland Security Investigations to target individuals facilitating UAC and family unit travel to the US.”

June 5, 2014:  DHS Virtually Eliminates Education Requirements for DACA Renewal

Contrary to the publicly announced reasoning behind the DACA policy, guidance published by USCIS reveals that the agency will not require proof that individuals applying for DACA renewal graduated from an educational institution or are even continuing their studies. Also, many applicants will not have to include any supporting documentation at all.

June 20, 2014:  Obama Administration Officials Admit Rumors of Amnesty Fueled Border Surge 

White House Director of Domestic Policy Cecilia Muñoz says that “misinformation . . . is being deliberately planted by criminal organizations, by smuggling networks, about what people can expect if they come to the United States.” This contradicts statements by Muñoz in early June, when she denied that rumors of amnesty played a role in the surge:  “At least from our own anecdotal experience, from our federal agencies in talking with these children as they arrive, they appear to be unaware of the potential for any benefits. It seems to be quite clear that what’s driving this is what is happening in their home countries.”

July 2, 2014:  Border Patrol Union:  “It’s Open Season on Border Patrol Agents”

In an interview, National Border Patrol Council Vice President Shawn Moran states that conditions on the border are more dangerous than ever and that “[i]t seems that it’s open season on Border Patrol agents.” Moran warns:  “There are still people that are getting away—they are getting around us—and the cartels are managing this to their own advantage. And so, it is still a very dangerous place.” Moran states that agents are frustrated with pay cuts, lack of resources, “lip service” from Congress, and an official administration policy of “catch and release” for illegal immigrants that only encourages more illegal immigration:  “You cannot be complicit in getting people further into the United States by giving them bus tickets, giving them a notice to appear, when you know good and well that 80 percent-plus do not show up for these immigration hearings.”

July 5, 2014:  ICE Data Shows 80 Percent Decline in Deportations of Minors

According to a report in the Los Angeles Times, citing ICE data released pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act request, deportations of minors fell from 8,143 in 2008 to 1,669 in 2013.

July 7, 2014:  Internal Government Intelligence Report Shows Administration Policy Behind Border Surge

According to a leaked report from the El Paso Intelligence Center (EPIC), the widespread belief that illegal immigrants would receive “permisos” upon arriving at the U.S. border is the driving factor in the decision to come to the U.S. Below are key excerpts from the report:

“In late May, the U.S. Border Patrol interviewed unaccompanied children (UAC) and migrant families apprehended in the Rio Grande Valley. Of the 230 total migrants interviewed, 219 cited the primary reason for migrating to the United States was the perception of U.S. immigration laws granting free passes, or permisos, to UAC and adult female OTMs traveling with minors. Migrants indicated that knowledge of permisos was widespread across Central America due to word of mouth, local, and international media messaging—prompting many to depart for the United States within 30 days of becoming aware of these perceived benefits, according to the same reporting.”

“A majority of migrants interviewed also noted that they had encountered family units, consisting of a mother and child under the age of 18 during their journey to the United States and that the families had indicated they planned to surrender to U.S. authorities because they were informed that they would likely be released.”

“EPIC assesses homicide trends and migrant interviews suggest violence is likely not the principal factor driving the increase in UAC migration. While CBP data from early fiscal year 2011 indicates a steady increase in OTM and UAC migration, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) statistics—within this same timeframe—show a decline in per capita homicide rates in these three countries; El Salvador saw the sharpest decline, followed by Honduras and Guatemala, respectively.”

“Migrants cited Univision, Primer Impacto, Al Rojo Vivo and several Honduran television news outlets for helping shape their perception of U.S. immigration policy.”

“Although EPIC lacks reliable reporting of Central American newspapers broadcasting the perceived benefits of U.S. immigration policies, several U.S. media outlets since June 2014 have identified Central American newspapers that have enticed minors to travel to the United States. For example, Honduran and El Salvadoran press have reportedly advertised the DACA policy, accommodations for detained UAC, and the promise of reunification with family members in the United States.”

“U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) also notes that a large number of migrants interviewed claimed family members in the United States encouraged their travel because the U.S. government would cease issuing permisos after June 2014.”

“U.S. Border Patrol officials report that the majority of migrants interviewed in late May indicated that they made arrangements with smugglers in their respective countries through the assistance of family members and friends in the United States.”

“EPIC assesses that UAC flow to the border will remain elevated until migrants’ misperceptions about US immigration benefits are changed.”

July 12, 2014:  Border Patrol Reassigned to Paperwork, Changing Diapers

According to National Border Patrol Council Vice President Shawn Moran, Border Patrol agents are routinely reassigned from their duties to changing diapers and babysitting. In an interview, Agent Hector Garza states that up 70 percent of agents have been reassigned from patrolling the border to handling paperwork related to the border surge. Former National Deputy Chief of Border Patrol Ronald Colburn tells National Review:  “It’s ironic that over the past decade we’ve doubled the staffing levels of sworn uniformed armed officer personnel, yet we now find them with their sleeves rolled up repairing vehicles, processing paperwork, answering phones, changing diapers, mixing formulas, playing badminton with children—they’re doing anything except patrolling the border. And [it’s] contrary to their own mission, but it’s out of their hands.”

July 14, 2014:  Asylum Approvals Increase Tenfold under Obama Administration

According to a report in the Daily Caller, leaked DHS data shows successful asylum claims almost tripled from 2012 to 2013, up to 30,393—ten times the number of approvals in 2008.

July 16, 2014:  White House Cites “Privacy Rights” in Refusing To Release Location of Illegal Immigrants Relocated During Border Surge  

White House Spokesperson Josh Earnest refuses to answer questions regarding the relocation of illegal immigrants throughout the U.S., stating that the Administration would “abide by the privacy rights of particular individuals.”

July 19, 2014:  Report Reveals Obama Administration Had Advance Warning of Border Surge    

Contradicting administration claims that “nobody could have predicted the scale” of the border surge, the Washington Post reports that nearly a year earlier, DHS received a 41-page report (funded and supported by DHS’s Science and Technology Directorate) “rais[ing] alarms about the federal government’s capacity to manage a situation that was expected to grow worse.” In addition, Texas Governor Rick Perry had written to President Obama in May 2012, warning of such a crisis. According to the Post:

“A person involved in the planning said that inside the White House, national security staffers were concerned about the growing influx of children but that the influential team of domestic policy advisers was far more focused on the legislative push. ‘Was the White House told there were huge flows of Central Americans coming? Of course they were told. A lot of times,’ said the person, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. ‘Was there a general lack of interest and a focus on the legislation? Yes, that’s where the focus was.’”

July 21, 2014:  Agents Believe Administration Intentionally Handcuffing Them in Midst of Border Crisis; Fear Retaliation for Speaking Out 

According to former National Deputy Chief of the Border Patrol Ronald Colburn, some ICE officials believe “the Obama Administration has intentionally neglected to give them orders to support efforts to resolve” the border crisis. Colburn states:

“They’re sitting still at their desks—reading newspapers, playing video games on their government computers—because they’re not being tasked with work, and they feel like it’s coming all the way down from the top.  These are guys that do want to go out more, but basically they’re not.”

Executive Vice President of the Law Enforcement Officers Advocates Council and retired Border Patrol agent Dave Stoddard says all law enforcement agents are “terrified” of speaking out for fear of the consequences. One CBP email obtained by National Review warns that the punishment for leaking certain information to outside sources could result in up to 10 years in prison. Earlier in July, a Border Patrol agent received a cease and desist letter after speaking out about public health risks relating to transporting illegal immigrants. He later receives a formal reprimand.

August 11, 2014:  Department of Education Releases Fact Sheet about Illegal Aliens Being Entitled to Public Education

The Department of Education releases a Fact Sheet stating that all illegal immigrant minors are entitled to a publically-funded education. According to the FAQ section, “States and local educational agencies are obligated to provide all children—regardless of immigration status—with equal access to public education at the elementary and secondary level. This includes children such as unaccompanied children who may be involved in immigration proceedings.”

August 11, 2014:  Obama Administration Approves Rule to Reverse Longstanding Policy Banning Libyan Pilots and Nuclear Scientists from Training in U.S.

OMB approves a final regulation to lift a ban on permitting Libyan pilots and nuclear scientists to enter the U.S. to attend flight school, work in aviation maintenance or flight operations, or study or seek training in nuclear science. The ban had been put in place in 1983 after numerous terrorist attacks involving Libyans. Approximately a month later, on September 17, 2014, Secretary Johnson testifies before the House Homeland Security Committee that he did not intend to lift the ban “at this time.”

August 12, 2014:  DHS Inspector General Reveals ICE Released 2,211 Illegal Immigrants, Including 600 Criminal Aliens, in Early 2013

According to a DHS Inspector General report, ICE released 2,211 illegal immigrants in FY13, including 617 criminal aliens, purportedly in anticipation of budget cuts due to the sequester. The report states that ICE leadership decided to sharply reduce detention populations but did not inform the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) of its planned releases:  “We were not able to determine why ICE executive leadership did not wait for OMB to make a decision on releasing additional funding.” According to the report, ICE leadership sent some of its field offices a target reduction number higher than their current detention population; did not provide written guidance on prioritizing releases or from which facilities to release them; did not formally notify ICE attorneys of the releases; and did not instruct field offices to track the releases. ICE leadership also did not provide Congress with accurate information on the number released for budgetary reasons. The report states that since the releases,

“DHS transferred funding from other DHS components to fund detention bed space. Despite this transfer, [Enforcement and Removal Operations] officials said ICE executive leadership instructed them several times to increase detention populations and then release detainees. As a result, . . . ICE did not meet the [statutory] 34,000 mandate for FY 2013.”

August 16, 2014:  Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Transfers Thousands of Unaccompanied Illegal Immigrant “Minors” with Gang Ties throughout U.S.

Vice President of the National Border Patrol Council Shawn Moran tells Fox News that MS-13 gang members are crossing the border and using Red Cross phones at detention facilities to coordinate gang activity. RGV Border Patrol Agent and Local 3307 Union Representative Albert Spratte tells CNSNews that many of the MS-13 gang members are adults but Border Patrol has to process them as minors if they claim to be under 18.

August 20, 2014:  Boston Becomes Sanctuary City

The Boston City Council unanimously passes the “Boston Trust Act,” which provides that the City will no longer hold illegal immigrants for federal authorities unless an arrest warrant has been issued. ICE spokesman Daniel Modricker refuses to address the ordinance, instead stating:  “When law enforcement agencies remand criminals to ICE custody rather than releasing them into the community, it helps contribute to public safety and the safety of law enforcement. To further this shared goal, ICE anticipates that law enforcement agencies will comply with detainers.”

August 21, 2014:  ICE Discloses Information on Location of Illegal Immigrants Convicted of Homicide and Released

In response to a letter from Senate Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Chuck Grassley, ICE discloses that of the 169 detainees with a “homicide-related conviction” released from custody in FY2013, 131 had been ordered deported. However, ICE does not specify how many, if any, actually have been deported. The letter provides the zip codes associated with the criminal aliens’ last known addresses.

August 22, 2014:  After Initial Denials, TSA Admits Illegal Immigrants Permitted to Board Planes without Identification 

After denying such accounts for over a month, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) admits that illegal immigrants are being permitted to board planes with no more than a “Notice to Appear” issued when they arrived in the U.S.  TSA had originally stated:  “These reports are false. A Notice to Appear, issued by the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), is not an acceptable form of ID at the TSA checkpoint.” In a letter to Rep. Kenny Merchant (R-TX), however, TSA had admitted that if such an NTA is presented as identification, TSA will allow the passenger to board if TSA can corroborate the passenger’s identity though “DHS partner components.”

August 25, 2014:  Report Reveals Border Surge Will Cost States $761 Million in Education Costs

The Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) releases a report, based on federal government data, indicating that more than 37,000 minors who were part of the border surge and have been transferred throughout the U.S. are eligible to attend public schools. The report states that 10 states make up the bulk of the cost at nearly $600 million:  New York, Texas, Maryland, California, New Jersey, Florida, Virginia, Louisiana, Massachusetts, and Georgia.

August 26, 2014:  Department of Justice Announces Victims of Domestic Violence in Guatemala May Qualify for Asylum in U.S.

Under the INA, individuals may seek asylum if they can show evidence of persecution based on race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a qualified “particular social group.” On August 26, 2014, the Department of Justice’s Board of Immigration Appeals rules that “‘married women in Guatemala who are unable to leave their relationship can constitute a cognizable particular social group that forms the basis of a claim for asylum or withholding of removal.” This ruling means that anyone who merely claims a history of domestic violence in a foreign country may be entitled to refuse to seek the assistance of local law enforcement, leave his or her country, and come to the United States indefinitely.

August 27, 2014:  Obama Administration Enters into Settlement with ACLU Allowing Deported Illegal Immigrants to Return to U.S.

The Obama Administration enters into a settlement with the ACLU, which represents 9 Mexicans who claim they were “tricked” into agreeing to fast-track voluntary return deportation agreements between 2009 and 2013. Under the settlement, not only will the 9 individuals be able to return to the U.S. to challenge their deportations in court, but so too will anyone who deported voluntarily during that time period, which the ACLU estimates to be in the hundreds of thousands. Some argue that the agreement sets a legal precedent that could cover roughly 8.8 million illegal immigrants who were successfully deported under the same policy from 2001 to 2012. The settlement agreement also requires the U.S. to launch an outreach effort through Mexican media to inform deportees that they may be eligible to return if they are part of the settlement class. In addition, federal agents must advise illegal immigrants of their right to a hearing and provide them with access to an informational hotline and a list of free legal services providers.

August 28, 2014:  ICE Officers Ordered to Stay Away From Amnesty Rally in Front of ICE Headquarters

When 2,000 amnesty activists are expected at a CASA de Maryland rally in front of ICE Headquarters in Washington, D.C., Assistant Director Timothy Moynihan directs ICE personnel not to “engage in verbal or physical confrontation with participants.” An ICE officer speaking on the condition of anonymity says:

“We’re a big joke to these immigrant rights groups and the illegal immigrants know we’re not allowed to do anything. So basically, we have to use the back door and let activists, many who are illegal, stand in front of our building and protest the law. We have to sit there and watch, we have to suck it up and know that regardless of the law, groups like CASA can pretty much dictate policy and do whatever they want.”

August 29, 2014:  Over Six Months, 37,477 Unaccompanied Alien Minors Released, Only 280 Deported

HHS releases a report listing 126 counties throughout the U.S. where 29,890 unaccompanied alien minors have been transferred. Only 280 (0.9 percent) have been deported.

August 29, 2014:  EEOC Signs Agreement with Mexican Government to Allow Mexican Nationals, Including Illegal Immigrants, to Exercise “Workplace Rights”

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) enters into a Memorandum of Understanding with the Mexican government that states that the EEOC will provide education and training programs to inform Mexican Nationals about their workplace rights and to inform employers about compliance with anti-discrimination laws. EEOC General Counsel David Lopez says:  “This redoubles our efforts to ensure that the most vulnerable workers are protected by the laws – even those who live and work in the shadows.”

September 2, 2014:  President Obama Declares Illegal Immigration to Be a “Right”

In a Labor Day speech in Milwaukee, President Obama declares that illegal immigration is a “right”:  “Hope is what gives young people the strength to march for women’s rights, and workers’ rights, and civil rights, and voting rights, and gay rights, and immigration rights.”

September 2, 2014:  Obama Administration Announces 18-Month Extension of Temporary Protected Status for Sudan and South Sudan

Secretary Johnson announces that Sudanese nationals are eligible for Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for an additional 18 months, effective November 3, 2014, through May 2, 2016. TPS for Sudan was initially granted on May 3, 2013, and on September 2, 2014, for South Sudan. The DHS Secretary may declare TPS for certain foreign countries if “conditions in the country that temporarily prevent the country’s nationals from returning safely, or in certain circumstances, where the country is unable to handle the return of its nationals adequately.” TPS is granted to individuals from specifically designated countries who are already in the U.S., regardless of immigration status, meaning those who entered the U.S. illegally or overstayed their visa are eligible. Although TPS is generally granted to nationals of a TPS-designated country, individuals who last resided in the designated country may also qualify.  Individuals who are granted TPS (or found preliminarily eligible after an initial review) cannot be removed from the U.S., can be granted travel authorization, and can obtain employment authorization. Once TPS is granted, DHS cannot detain a person based on his or her immigration status.

September 2, 2014:  Report Reveals that DHS Has Lost Track of More Than 6,000 Foreign Nationals on Student Visas of “Heightened Concern”

ABC News reports that DHS has lost track of more than 6,000 foreign nationals in the U.S. on student visas. According to the report, more than one million foreign students enter the U.S. each year. DHS’s own data show that 58,000 overstayed their student visas in the past year alone, of which 6,000 were referred to agents because they were determined to be of “heightened concern.” Approximately 40 percent of the estimated 11 to 12 million illegal immigrants in the U.S. are visa overstays. The article notes that closing loopholes in the student visa program was a major recommendation of the 9/11 Commission, “after it was determined that the hijacker who flew Flight 77 into the Pentagon, Hani Hanjour, had entered the U.S. on a student visa but never showed up for school.” The article states 9/11 Commission Chair Tom Kean “was stunned the federal government continues to lose track of so many foreign nationals who had entered the country with student visas.”

September 2, 2014:  Justice Department Sues Employer for Attempting to Ensure a Legal Workforce

The Justice Department announces a settlement with Culinaire International, which was alleged to have engaged in “citizenship discrimination” during the employment eligibility reverification process for requiring lawful permanent residents to produce new Permanent Resident Cards when their prior card expired. Under the settlement agreement, Culinaire will pay $20,460 in civil penalties, undergo training on the anti-discrimination provisions of the INA, establish a $40,000 back pay fund to “compensate potential economic victims,” revise its employment eligibility reverification policies, and be subject to federal government monitoring for 20 months.

September 3, 2014:  Obama Administration Conceals Continued Influx of Border Crossings

Despite the President’s claims during an August 28, 2014, press conference that border apprehensions in August are down from July and lower than the previous year, CBP records reveal the number of “family units”—adults and children crossing together—fell only slightly from 5,517 to 5,205. The President was likely referring only to the number of unaccompanied minors, which fell from 4,322 in July to 2,037 in August.

September 3, 2014:  Immigration Court Dates for Illegal Immigrants from Border Surge Years Away

Reports surface that immigration judges are setting court dates for recent border crossers as far into the future as 2018.

September 9, 2014:  Justice Department Rolls Back Operation Streamline

In a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder, Arizona Senators John McCain and Jeff Flake state that the Yuma County Sheriff’s Office has informed them that the U.S. Attorney for Arizona will no longer prosecute first-time border crossers under Operation Streamline—“a program seeking to reduce recidivism by expeditiously prosecuting those entering or reentering illegally under a ‘zero tolerance’ approach.” The letter notes that due in part to the program, “Yuma Sector’s border with Mexico has gone from being one of the busiest and most dangerous in the nation to one of the most secure.” To date, Holder has not responded.

September 11, 2014:  Report Reveals that U.S. Border Patrol Cannot Track Thousands of Released Illegal Immigrants

According to statement issued to Texas television station KRGV, government officials have no mechanism to keep track of illegal immigrants who fail to report to ICE after being released by the U.S. Border Patrol.

September 12, 2014:  Associated Press Reports Deportations Lowest Since 2007

According to an analysis of DHS data by the Associated Press, the Obama Administration is on pace to remove the fewest number of illegal immigrants since 2007. The report also notes that “as of early September, only 319 of the more than 59,000 immigrants who were caught traveling with their families have been returned to Central America.”

September 12, 2014:  Despite Law Prohibiting Taxpayer-Funded Lawyers for Illegal Immigrants, Department of Justice Announces Millions in Legal Aid Grants for Unaccompanied Minors

The Department of Justice and the Corporation for National and Community Service announce $1.8 million in taxpayer-funded grants to “legal aid organizations to enroll approximately 100 lawyers and paralegals to represent children in immigration proceedings.”  However, under the INA, illegal immigrants are not entitled to taxpayer-funded representation in immigration proceedings.

September 17, 2014:  DHS Secretary Admits Amnesty Background Checks Would Miss Terrorists, Criminals

Testifying before the House Homeland Security Committee, Secretary Johnson admits that terrorists and criminals in the country illegally would not voluntarily undergo background checks.

September 18, 2014:  USCIS Union President Says Administration’s Lax Policies Easily Exploited by Terrorists

In a statement, U.S. National Citizenship and Immigration Services Council President Ken Palinkas warns that terrorists can “exploit our loose and lax visa policies to gain entry to the United States.” Palinkas goes on to state:

“Our caseworkers cannot even do in-person interviews for people seeking citizenship, they cannot enforce restrictions on welfare use, and they even lack the basic office space to properly function. Applications for entry are rubber-stamped, the result of grading agents by speed rather than discretion. We’ve become the visa clearinghouse for the world.”

September 19, 2014:  Internal CBP Document Reveals that 474 Illegal Immigrants from Terrorism-Linked Countries Apprehended in 2014 

An internal document from the CBP Office of Intelligence and Investigative Liaison reveals that 474 illegal immigrants from terrorism-linked countries were apprehended in 2014 alone. Since FY2009, almost 3,000 such individuals have been apprehended by Border Patrol attempting to enter the U.S.

September 30, 2014:  DHS Inspector General Report Reveals Visa Security Program in Shambles

The DHS Inspector General releases a report stating that not only has DHS failed to fully implement the Visa Security Program (currently in less than 10 percent of all consular offices), but it is also unclear whether the program is effective, because the program is so poorly run. The program is supposed to stop terrorists and other bad actors from obtaining visas.

September 30, 2014:  Obama Administration Circumvents Congress and Creates New Central American In-Country Refugee Program

The State Department announces that parents who are “lawfully present” in the U.S. who have children living in El Salvador, Guatemala, or Honduras may request their child’s admission into the U.S. as a refugee—despite a lack of explanation as to how those children may constitute “refugees” as defined in the INA. Even when a child is not eligible for entry under the refugee program, they can still be considered for entry under a case-by-case parole program. Section 101 of the INA defines a refugee as a person “who has a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.” Courts have held that persecution requires government action, and that general violence or poverty does not meet the requirements for refugee or asylee status. Parole, commonly referred to as “humanitarian parole,” is authorized by Section 212 of the INA. The statute grants the Executive Branch discretion to “parole into the United States temporarily under such conditions as [it] may prescribe only on a case-by-case basis for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit.” While the administration acknowledges in its release that parole, by definition, is temporary in nature, it says aliens granted parole from Central America would be allowed into the U.S. in two-year increments and allowed to renew their parole, apparently indefinitely. It is later revealed that those granted deferred action, deferred enforced departure, and withhold of removal, will be eligible to participate. In effect, the program will allow “illegals in the United States to bring their children, their adult children, their grandchildren, and even step-parents into the United States.”

September 30, 2014:  Obama Administration Announces Plans to Accept Large Numbers of Syrian Refugees

According to statements delivered by the Assistant Secretary of State at a United Nations meeting in Geneva, the Obama administration expects the number of refugees entering the United States from Syria “to surge in 2015 and beyond.” The United States currently accepts 70,000 “displaced persons” a year, more than all the other countries in the world combined.

October 1, 2014:  Despite Law Prohibiting Taxpayer-Funded Lawyers for Illegal Immigrants, HHS Announces Millions in Legal Aid for Illegal Immigrants

The Department of Health and Human Services announces that it will give $9.2 million to the Conference of Catholic Bishops and the Committee for Refugees and Immigrants to provide legal assistance to undocumented minors in deportation proceedings. Under federal law, illegal aliens are not entitled to government-funded representation in immigration proceedings.

October 4, 2014:  Obama Administration Continues to Ignore Growing Sanctuary Jurisdiction Problem

According to the Los Angeles Times, more than 225 local law enforcement agencies across the country have policies to completely ignore ICE detainer requests. Another 25 local law enforcement agencies limit the number of detainer requests they will honor.  In a statement to the Times, an ICE spokeswoman simply says that ICE will continue to work with local agencies “to enforce its priorities through the identification and removal of convicted criminals and other public safety threats.” According to an October 17, 2014, Fox News report, in the last nine months, 275 counties in 42 states have refused to honor ICE detainers. “In doing so, those jurisdictions have released some 9,000 [illegal immigrants] with criminal records who otherwise would have been removed from the U.S.”

October 6, 2014:  Obama Administration Solicits Bids for Contractors to Produce Millions of ID Cards Ahead of Executive Amnesty

USCIS posts a draft solicitation for bids for vendors capable of producing a “surge” of 9 million identification cards in one year and “to support possible future immigration reform initiative requirements.” The solicitation states that USCIS will need a minimum of 4 million cards per year and estimates the maximum for the entire contract to be 34 million cards.

October 7, 2014:  Report Reveals that Mexican Government Pays for Illegal Immigrants’ DACA Application Fees

A report from NPR reveals that Mexican consulates in the U.S. have been providing financial assistance for Mexican nationals to apply for DACA, including paying for all or part of the application costs and legal fees for lawyers. When asked why the Mexican government is spending money to help its citizens remain in the U.S., a spokesperson said the government’s “main objective is the well-being of our nationals wherever they are.”

October 9, 2014:  DHS Secretary Announces Increase in Border Apprehensions for Third Straight Year

Appearing before the Center for Strategic and International Studies, DHS Secretary Johnson announces that illegal immigration across the southern border has increased for the third straight year, reaching 479,377 apprehensions in FY2014. Although largely ignored by the media, Johnson admits that the influx of unaccompanied minors (68,541) was matched by an equally large influx of “family units” (68,445):  “A lot of the spike that we saw this summer were not just unaccompanied kids. Unaccompanied kids got the most attention. But a lot of it, perhaps on the same numbers, if not larger, were what we call family units—parents with kids.”

October 10, 2014:  Federal Employee Survey Shows DHS Morale Continues to Sink

The 2014 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey reveals morale among DHS personnel continues to decline, and is among the lowest levels in the entire federal government, with only 41.6 percent of survey participants indicating they are satisfied with their employer. When DHS employees were asked on their views of their employers, only 24.9 percent had a positive response, with many also noting that leadership did not maintain high standards of honesty and integrity.

October 13, 2014:  Reports Reveal that Obama Administration is Abusing Advance Parole to Allow DACA Recipients to Leave U.S. and Return without Consequences Mandated by Law

A local Arizona radio station reports, and it is later confirmed, that around 40 illegal aliens benefitting from the DREAM Act were issued “advanced-parole documents” that allowed them to visit Mexico and then immediately reenter the United States.

October 15, 2014:  Report Reveals Further Collapse of Immigration Enforcement

A new report from the Center for Immigration Studies analyzing ICE records shows that immigration enforcement has continued to decline significantly in 2014. The report notes:

Total deportations credited to ICE, the majority of which were arrests by Border Patrol and CBP officers at ports of entry, declined 15 percent from 2013 to 2014.

Deportations from the interior dropped 34 percent from 2013 and are 58 percent lower than the peak in 2009.

The number of criminal aliens deported from the interior also declined 23 percent since 2013 and declined by 39 percent since the peak in 2011.

Catch-and-release policies continue: in 2014 deportation processing was initiated for only about 143,000 illegal immigrants out of the 585,000 encountered by agents. Tens of thousands of those let go by ICE had been labeled a criminal threat.

The number receiving a final order of removal but still in the U.S. has risen to nearly 900,000; nearly 160,000 are convicted criminals who were released by ICE and are currently at large.

October 16, 2014:  Obama Administration Extends Temporary Protected Status for Honduras and Nicaragua

Secretary Johnson extends the Temporary Protected Status of Honduran and Nicaraguan nationals to July 5, 2016. TPS for Honduras was initially granted on January 5, 1999, and for Nicaragua on March 9, 2001. The DHS Secretary may declare TPS for certain foreign countries if “conditions in the country that temporarily prevent the country’s nationals from returning safely, or in certain circumstances, where the country is unable to handle the return of its nationals adequately.” TPS is granted to individuals from specifically designated countries who are already in the U.S., regardless of immigration status, meaning those who entered the U.S. illegally or overstayed their visa are eligible. Although TPS is generally granted to nationals of a TPS-designated country, individuals who last resided in the designated country may also qualify. Individuals who are granted TPS (or found preliminarily eligible after an initial review) cannot be removed from the U.S., can be granted travel authorization, and can obtain employment authorization. Once TPS is granted, DHS cannot detain a person based on his or her immigration status.

October 17, 2014:  President Obama Circumvents Congress and Creates New Program to Allow 109,000 Haitians to Enter U.S. Without Visas

USCIS announces a new Haitian Family Reunification Parole Program, which will waive visa waiting periods for family-based immigration visa applications. This program will permit an estimated 109,000 Haitians to enter and work in the U.S. up to two years earlier than they otherwise would have under current law, even though visas are not currently available. Under current law, visa applicants must wait in their home country until a visa becomes available. The President claims he has the power to do this under parole authority; however, as indicated elsewhere, parole was intended to be used for humanitarian purposes and on a case-by-case basis.

October 21, 2014:  USCIS Director Predicts Another Border Surge

Speaking at Georgetown University Law Center, USCIS Director Leon Rodriguez states that the administration is working to “prepare for another potential surge” at the border:  “In order to process individuals more efficiently at the border, the unaccompanied children presenting claims, we have had to redeploy, we’re also hiring more asylum officers. We have a lot of work to catch up.”

October 22, 2014:  DACA Recipients on North Carolina Voter Rolls

After the Division of Motor Vehicles runs a search for individuals with DACA driver’s licenses, the North Carolina State Board of Elections discovers that 145 DACA recipients are listed on state voter rolls.

October 22, 2014:  Justice Department Expands Legal Orientation Program to Assist Illegal Immigrants

The Justice Department announces that beginning November 1, 2014, the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) will provide assistance to illegal immigrants detained at the Karnes Family Resident Center in Texas. Through the program, representatives from non-profit organizations provide explanations about immigration court procedures and other “basic legal information” to detained individuals.  The Justice Department announcement notes that “this expansion is possible due to additional funds Congress provided EOIR for the [program].” According to the announcement, since the start of FY2014, the program has expanded to seven additional sites and is currently at 32 sites across the country.

October 24, 2014:  Report Reveals Non-Citizen Voting in 2008 and 2010 Elections

A study by Professors Jesse Richman and David Earnest based on data from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES) reveals that “more than 14 percent of non-citizens in both the 2008 and 2010 samples indicated that they were registered to vote. Furthermore, some of these non-citizens voted.”

October 26, 2014:  Internal DHS Report Reveals Suspected Terrorists Crossed Northern Border

According to a leaked DHS Intelligence Information Report, at least 13 men with terrorist ties have illegally entered the U.S. in one region of the U.S.-Canadian border since 2010.  The report also details that, as of September 9, 2014, there have been 155 encounters in the same area involving hundreds of individuals from special interest countries.

October 27, 2014:  USCIS Union Pleads for Public’s Help in Stopping Executive Amnesty

In a statement, USCIS union president Ken Palinkas says:

“[T]his statement is intended for the public: if you care about your immigration security and your neighborhood security, you must act now to ensure that Congress stops this unilateral amnesty. Let your voice be heard and spread the word to your neighbors. We who serve in our nation’s immigration agencies are pleading for your help—don’t let this happen. Express your concern to your Senators and Congressmen before it is too late. Whether it’s the failure to uphold the public charge laws, the abuse of our asylum procedures, the admission of Islamist radicals, or visas for health risks, the taxpayers are being fleeced and public safety is being endangered on a daily basis.”

October 31, 2014:  94 Percent of Illegal Immigrants from Border Surge Fail to Appear in Immigration Court

According to documents from the Executive Office of Immigration Review (EOIR), between July 18 and October 7, 2014, immigration judges handed down 3,885 decisions on removal cases with respect to “aliens” in family units—94 percent of which were made in absentia. Over that same time period, 9,874 cases were still pending. Of the 9,170 cases where individuals appeared before a judge, 7,330 were adjourned.

November 6, 2014:  Lawsuit Alleges ICE Leadership Pressured Prosecutors to Release Criminal Aliens

An award-winning career prosecutor and Chief of the Phoenix, Arizona ICE field office files a lawsuit against Secretary Johnson for retaliation after she resisted orders to release convicted criminal illegal aliens from ICE custody. The complaint highlights the Obama administration’s gross mismanagement of OPLA—including by high-ranking officials in OPLA, such as Peter Vincent, James Stolley, Matthew Downer, and Riah Ramlogan, some of whom were previously involved in directing a backdoor amnesty at the ICE Office of Chief Counsel in Houston. According to the complaint, ICE leadership directed its field offices not to take action against aliens with felony convictions, including an alien who registered to vote twice and claimed to be a U.S. citizen.

November 10, 2014:  President Obama Circumvents Congress and Announces Visa Agreement with China

President Obama announces a plan to extend the validity of Chinese tourist and business visas from one to ten years in exchange for identical extensions from China.  Student visas will also be extended from one to five years under the agreement.

November 10, 2014:  Apprehensions of Unaccompanied Minors Up 77 Percent in FY2014

According to CBP data, apprehensions of unaccompanied minors in FY2014 are up 77 percent, while apprehensions of family units are up 361 percent, compared to the previous year.

November 17, 2014:  Report Reveals Executive Amnesty Will Give Illegal Immigrants Access to Public Benefits

According to a report from the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), if the President uses “parole” or “deferred action” to circumvent Congress and grant amnesty, those individuals will be eligible for federal benefits such as Obamacare, unemployment benefits, Social Security, the Earned Income Tax Credit, Medicare, Medicaid, SCHIP, and TANF.

November 20, 2014:  President Obama Announces Executive Amnesty 

President Obama announces his “Immigration Accountability Executive Action,” unilaterally circumventing immigration law, including granting “deferred action” to approximately 5 million illegal immigrants. DHS issues 10 memos detailing the changes, such as ending the Secure Communities program and extending DACA to illegal immigrant parents of Americans and legal permanent residents. The White House issues two memoranda focusing on the immigrant visa system and integrating immigrants.

November 20, 2014:  Obama Administration Announces Designation of Temporary Protected Status for Nationals from Ebola-Affected Countries

Secretary Johnson announces that nationals from Liberia, Guinea, and Sierra Leone have been designated for Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for 18 months due to the Ebola outbreak in West Africa. The DHS Secretary may declare TPS for certain foreign countries if “conditions in the country that temporarily prevent the country’s nationals from returning safely, or in certain circumstances, where the country is unable to handle the return of its nationals adequately.” TPS is granted to individuals from specifically designated countries who are already in the U.S., regardless of immigration status, meaning those who entered the U.S. illegally or overstayed their visa are eligible. Although TPS is generally granted to nationals of a TPS-designated country, individuals who last resided in the designated country may also qualify. Individuals who are granted TPS (or found preliminarily eligible after an initial review) cannot be removed from the U.S., can be granted travel authorization, and can obtain employment authorization. Once TPS is granted, DHS cannot detain a person based on his or her immigration status.

November 24, 2014:  ICE Issues Agents Five-Point Checklist “For NOT Arresting/Removing Individuals”

ICE issues a 5-point questionnaire to its agents instructing them when not to deport someone under DHS’s expanded deferred action programs. Despite President Obama and Secretary Johnson’s promises that deportation will be handled on a case-by-case basis, the ICE checklist instructs agents to release any individual who meets the criteria.

November 25, 2014:  White House Admits Many Executive Amnesty Recipients Will Be Eligible for Social Security, Medicare, and Other Benefits

President Obama’s plan to provide amnesty for millions of illegal aliens will also provide federal benefits. In an e-mail from White House spokesman Shawn Turner to the Washington Post, Turner confirms that eligible illegal immigrants will be eligible to receive federal benefits like Social Security, Medicare, and survivor and disability benefits, among others.

November 25, 2014:  HHS Secretary Says Obamacare Enrollees Will Not Be Asked for Immigration Status

When asked if families with “mixed” immigration status will be eligible for Obamacare, Health and Human Services Secretary Burwell replies that “everyone should come on, and folks should not be scared. No questions will be asked, and it is not about an immigration issue.” When questioned about DACA recipients, however, Secretary Burwell suggests that they would remain ineligible, though she identifies no enforcement mechanism in the absence of questions about immigration status.

November 25, 2014:  President Obama Admits He Unilaterally “Took Action to Change the Law”

When questioned at a rally a few days after his executive action, President Obama admits that he unilaterally changed immigration laws. Prompted by pro-amnesty hecklers, Obama states:  “Now, you’re absolutely right that there have been significant numbers of deportations. That’s true. But what you are not paying attention to is the fact that I just took an action to change the law.”

December 2, 2014:  DHS Still Cannot Determine Whether Border Is Secure 

Testifying before the House Homeland Security Committee, Secretary Johnson acknowledges that DHS still has not come up with metrics to measure border security:  “The Border Patrol has metrics and I’ve asked that they improve upon that.”

December 3, 2014:  DHS Announces 1,000 Job Openings, New Office Space in Preparation for Processing of Executive Amnesty 

While simultaneously claiming that deferred action in deporting illegal aliens is primarily due to a lack of resources, USCIS lists around 1,000 new job openings at an operational center Arlington, Virginia. The primary purpose of these new jobs is to process and carry out the President’s November 2014 executive actions. Salaries for these positions are listed as high as $157,000.

December 3, 2014:  26 States File Lawsuit Challenging Obama’s Executive Amnesty

Eighteen states file a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court in the Southern District of Texas challenging the President’s unilateral action on immigration.  As of February 6, 2015, 26 states are parties to the lawsuit. The lawsuit alleges that the President’s actions violate his duty under the Constitution’s Take Care Clause.

December 4, 2014:  ICE Report Shows 23 Percent Drop in Removals since FY2012; Release of 30,862 Convicted Criminals

ICE’s FY2014 Enforcement and Removal Operations report reveals that removals fell by over 14 percent as compared to 2013, and 23 percent as compared to 2012. Furthermore, of the 315,943 illegal immigrants removed from the country, less than one-third were apprehended in the interior. The report also indicates that over 1,000 of those apprehended were from countries known to have links to terrorism, and that more than 30,000 convicted criminals had been released from federal custody.

December 8, 2014:  ICE E-Mails Detail Plans to Drop Questions About Criminal History from Immigration Application 

Internal DHS documents reveal that immigrants applying for visas as victims of human trafficking or other criminal activity might be exempted from answering questions about their own criminal history. These were key areas targeted for immigration expansion in President Obama’s amnesty action, and may serve as loopholes for dangerous criminals seeking to enter the U.S.

December 9, 2014:  President Obama States Illegal Immigrants “Are Not Going to Be Deported”

President Obama admits to a group of illegal immigrants that his executive action would serve as de facto amnesty for nearly all of the 11 million illegal immigrants currently in the U.S. Obama acknowledges that the vast majority of illegal immigrants in the U.S. are “low priority,” and that anyone in the “low priority” range will not be deported. This contradicts his earlier statement that his unilateral actions would affect only around 5 million people.

December 9, 2014:  USCIS Director Claims Executive Action Meant to Make Illegal Aliens Impossible to Deport Later

USCIS Director Leon Rodriguez states that one of the purposes of the executive amnesty is to ensure that future presidents “cannot so easily by fiat now remove those people from the economy.” Rodriguez also suggests that there would be “dire economic consequences” if the federal government sought to deport more illegal aliens, and that this was “one of the major reasons why they haven’t been removed.” This contradicts DHS’s position that the President’s actions are required because DHS lacks adequate resources.

December 18, 2014:  After Executive Action, Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio Disbands Illegal Immigration Identity Theft Unit 

Noting that the President’s unlawful executive amnesty will permit many illegal immigrants to work in the U.S., Sheriff Arpaio disbands his identity theft unit. The unit had raided 83 businesses and charged more than 700 illegal immigrants with using fake or stolen identities.

December 19, 2014:  DHS Year-End Statistics Reveal Increase in Illegal Immigration, Decrease in Deportations

According to DHS data released just before the Christmas holiday, border apprehensions increased 16 percent in FY2014 while deportations from the interior of the U.S. fell by 24 percent. ICE deported only 315,000 immigrants in FY 2014, 45,000 less than 2013 and 95,000 less than 2012. The drop in interior removals was even more drastic as ICE deported only 102,000 illegal immigrants from the interior of the U.S., which is the lowest number of interior removal since 2006.

December 19, 2014:  Report Reveals 91 Percent of Illegal Immigrants from Border Surge Have Absconded

According to a report from local Houston news outlet examining information from the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), very few illegal immigrants have been repatriated to their home countries. The vast majority—91 percent—have absconded after being released and are no longer a priority under the Administration’s “prosecutorial discretion” policies. Following on this report, the Center for Immigration Studies releases an analysis that shows:

The number of family units arriving illegally was larger than the number of UACs during this time period, although the administration, its allies, and the media typically described the surge as an influx of children.

At least 92 percent of the family unit arrivals in this sample of cases were released after apprehension rather than detained in the border area.

Nearly all of those released (5,575 out of 6,093 total families and UACs, or 91 percent) subsequently failed to appear at their immigration hearings and are now part of the illegal population.

According to these figures, 43 percent of those family members classified as “detained” (nine people) also failed to appear for their hearings, suggesting that they actually were released at some point.

Even under the current very generous interpretations of immigration law, only 3 percent of these illegal aliens were found qualified to stay in the United States (204 out of 6,093 completed cases).

Only 314 of the 6,093 cases completed (5 percent) were present for their hearing and could actually be removed by authorities after receiving the order from the judge.

December 23, 2014:  HHS Seeks Shelter and Childcare Capacity in Preparation for Possible 2015 Border Surge 

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) posts a solicitation for bids in preparation for a surge of unaccompanied minors in 2015. The post seeks to develop contract options for temporary structures to serve as shelters for 100 to 2,500 children as well as “other related services.”

December 24, 2014:  DHS Inspector General Report Reveals CBP Drone Program to Be Ineffective

An audit by DHS’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG) finds that a drone surveillance system deployed by DHS “has not developed performance measures” and “has also not achieved the expected results.  According to the OIG report, CPB drones focused on about 170 miles (less than 10 percent) of the entire U.S. southern border.  The OIG estimates that it cost over $12,000 to support approximately 5,100 drones per hour in the air, compared to CBP’s estimate of approximately $2,100 per flight hour.

December 29, 2014:  Border Patrol Notes Illegal Border Crossers Becoming More Aggressive

President of the Tucson Border Patrol Local union Art Del Cueto states in an interview:  “In recent years, undocumented immigrants’ aggressiveness has increased and that is something we face when we patrol the desert.”

January 3, 2014:  Oversight Report Shows 700 Miles of Southern Border Remain Unprotected

The final oversight report issued by then-Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Ranking Member Tom Coburn reveals that 700 miles of the Southern border remain unsecured. The report further reveals that only 3 percent of illegal immigrants will ever be deported and that there is “little or no border security coverage for thousands of miles” of the northern U.S. border.

January 5, 2015:  Administration Announces 18-Month Redesignation of Temporary Protected Status for Syria

Secretary Johnson announces that the administration is re-designating Syria for Temporary Protected Status (TPS), extending the current designation from April 1, 2015, to September 30, 2016. The redesignation will allow eligible Syrian nationals (or those who last habitually resided in Syria) to register for TPS for the first time and the extension will allow current beneficiaries to extend their TPS. The DHS Secretary may declare TPS for certain foreign countries if “conditions in the country that temporarily prevent the country’s nationals from returning safely, or in certain circumstances, where the country is unable to handle the return of its nationals adequately.” TPS is granted to individuals who are already in the U.S., regardless of immigration status, meaning those who entered the U.S. illegally or overstayed their visa are eligible.  Although TPS is generally granted to nationals of a TPS-designated country, individuals who last resided in the designated country may also qualify. Individuals who are granted TPS (or found preliminarily eligible after an initial review) cannot be removed from the U.S., can be granted travel authorization, and can obtain employment authorization. Once TPS is granted, DHS cannot detain a person based on his or her immigration status.

 

January 6, 2015:  Over 1,000 Illegal Immigrants from Countries with Terrorism Ties Apprehended in FY2014

According to CBP data, agents apprehended 1,191 individuals from 12 of the 14 countries that the Departments of Homeland Security and State have designated as state sponsors of terror or  “countries of interest,” which are countries designated by the government to have terrorist links. The 12 countries are Iran, Sudan, Cuba, and Syria (state sponsors of terror), and Afghanistan, Algeria, Lebanon, Libya, Nigeria, Iraq, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, and Yemen (“countries of interest”).

January 7, 2015:  Obama Administration Extends Temporary Protected Status for El Salvador

Secretary Johnson extends the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for El Salvadoran nationals for an additional 18 months, effective March 10, 2015, through Sept. 9, 2016.  TPS for El Salvador was initially granted on March 9, 2001. The DHS Secretary may declare TPS for certain foreign countries if “conditions in the country that temporarily prevent the country’s nationals from returning safely, or in certain circumstances, where the country is unable to handle the return of its nationals adequately.” TPS is granted to individuals from specifically designated countries who are already in the U.S., regardless of immigration status, meaning those who entered the U.S. illegally or overstayed their visa are eligible. Although TPS is generally granted to nationals of a TPS-designated country, individuals who last resided in the designated country may also qualify. Individuals who are granted TPS (or found preliminarily eligible after an initial review) cannot be removed from the U.S., can be granted travel authorization, and can obtain employment authorization. Once TPS is granted, DHS cannot detain a person based on his or her immigration status.

January 8, 2015:  CBP Reports Increase in Aliens Attempting to Enter U.S. with False Papers

According to reports, there was a 25 percent increase in “inadmissibles,” or, people that were denied entry or detained at Texas ports of entry in FY2014. CBP notes that most of those were attempting to use fraudulent documents or documents that belonged to someone else.

January 11, 2015:  After President’s Executive Action, Border Patrol Agents Instructed Not to Focus on Majority of Illegal Immigrants in U.S. 

Leaked CBP training documents reveal that Border Patrol agents have been ordered not to enforce immigration laws against the vast majority of illegal immigrants in the U.S. The guidance is meant to inform CBP employees about the changes that the President’s executive will have on DHS’s enforcement priorities. Each agent involved in implementing the President’s executive actions will be required to undergo additional training.

January 13, 2015:  President Obama Unilaterally Establishes Diplomatic Relations with Cuba, Resulting in Immigrant Surge

After President Obama unilaterally establishes diplomatic relations with Cuba, there is a dramatic increase in the number of Cubans attempting to enter the U.S. According to the Washington Times, records shared with Congress show that “the Coast Guard interdicted more than 340 Cubans in the final two weeks of December, more than double the 140 who came in the first half of the month” prior to the President’s announcement. 144 Cubans were apprehended in the first week of January 2015.  Other reports note that the policy changes will require major changes to border security strategies.

January 14, 2015:  Mexican Government Announces It Will Provide Illegal Immigrants in U.S. with Birth Certificates

The Mexican government announces it will start issuing birth certificates to its citizens at consulates in the U.S. to make it easier for them to apply for work permits, driver’s licenses, and executive amnesty. Jessica Vaughan with the Center for Immigration Studies notes that such actions facilitate remittances to Mexico.

January 15, 2015:  Justice Department Sues Employer for Attempting to Ensure a Legal Workforce

The Justice Department announces a settlement with U.S. Service Industries (USSI), which was alleged to have violated the INA by discriminating against work-authorized individuals who are not U.S. citizens by requiring those individuals to produce documents issued by DHS as a condition of employment. Under the settlement agreement, USSI will pay $132,000 in civil penalties, undergo training on the anti-discrimination provisions of the INA, establish a $50,000 back pay fund to “compensate any workers who may have lost wages,” revise its employment eligibility verification policies, and be subject to federal government monitoring for two years.

January 15, 2015:  CBO Confirms Illegal Immigrants Granted Executive Amnesty Eligible for Federal Benefits

CBO releases a report finding that by 2017, two million additional illegal immigrants will be eligible for federal benefits under the Obama Administration’s executive amnesty plan. The report states that, over the next 10 years, the amnesty will cost over $10.2 billion in Earned Income Tax Credit and Child Tax Credit payouts; $1.8 billion in Medicare, Medicaid, and Obamacare subsidies; $1 billion in SSI; and $800 million in SNAP. CBO warns that long-term “federal spending would increase significantly,” with costs for Social Security and Medicare becoming much greater outside of the 10-year budget window analyzed in the agency’s report—the time period during which newly amnestied individuals would begin paying payroll taxes but not yet claiming benefits. In a December 1, 2014, Investor’s Business Daily article, Merrill Matthews, resident scholar with the Institute for Policy Innovation in Dallas, and Mark E. Litow, retired actuary and past chairman of the Social Insurance Public Finance Section of the Society of Actuaries, conclude similarly that while the government will receive about $500 billion in payroll tax revenue as a result of the amnesty, it will pay out some $2 trillion in Social Security and Medicare benefits over several decades.

January 28, 2015:  Obama Administration Orders Agents to Find Illegal Immigrants Eligible for Executive Amnesty

The Associated Press reports that internal DHS training documents direct immigration agents to ask illegal immigrants they encounter whether they might qualify for executive amnesty and to review government files to identify any jailed illegal immigrants who might be eligible for release under the program.

January 30, 2015:  USCIS Announces It Will Begin Accepting Requests for Expanded DACA on February 18, 2015 Pursuant to Executive Amnesty

USCIS announces that it will begin accepting requests for expanded DACA on February 18, 2015, pursuant to the President’s executive amnesty. Under the new guidelines, people of any current age who entered the country before age 16 and have lived in the U.S. since January 1, 2010, may now apply.

January 30, 2015:  1,000 Criminal Aliens Released by ICE in FY2013 Re-Offend

According to a 38-page DHS document provided to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, of the 36,007 criminal aliens released from ICE custody in FY2013, 1,000 have since been convicted of new crimes, including:  assault with a deadly weapon; terroristic threats; failure to register as a sex offender; lewd acts with a child under 14; aggravated assault; robbery; hit and run; criminal street gang activity; rape of spouse by force; and child cruelty involving possible injury/death.

February 2, 2015:  Government Data Reveals Obama Administration Issued 7.4 Million Work Permits Since 2009 In Excess of Established Levels

A Freedom of Information Act request filed by the Center for Immigration Studies unearths government data revealing that the Obama Administration issued more than 7.4 million work permits to aliens from 2009 to 2014, beyond that which is authorized by statute.   That includes 4.7 million new Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) and 2.7 million renewals of expired EADs.  According to the published data, this includes 2.2 million EADs for unlawful entrants or those unqualified for admission, 547,000 individuals here on tourist visas, 593,000 foreign students who are supposed to be subject to strict restrictions, and 37,000 individuals who arrived through the Visa Waiver Program.   Crucially, these EADs are in addition to and beyond the existing annual grant of approximately 1 million permanent residency or green cards to mostly lesser-skilled legal immigrants and 700,000 foreign guest workers.

February 4, 2015:  Former USCIS Official Testifies Executive Amnesty Could Overwhelm Agency

The former deputy ombudsman for USCIS, Luke Bellocchi, testifies before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee that it is “hard to imagine” that USCIS can handle the increase in new applications from the President’s executive amnesty. Bellocchi testified that USCIS’s processing system is paper-based and will likely have to divert resources from other immigration applications to handle the executive amnesty.

February 6, 2015:  DHS Announces Hotlines for Illegal Immigrants to Lodge Complaints Against Immigration Enforcement Officers Who “Violate” New Amnesty Policy

CBP announces a hotline for illegal immigrants “wishing to submit a formal complaint pertaining to an encounter with a Customs and Border Protection Officer or Border Patrol Agent.” Prior to the announcement, DHS had alerted “stakeholders” of three such hotlines for CBP, ICE, and USCIS. Vice President of the National Border Patrol Council Shawn Moran responds, stating “[i]nstead of supporting our agents, this administration has decided it is more important to find new ways to solicit complaints and invite ridicule against them. We demand that this administration spend more time defending the men and women defending our nation and less time promoting the extreme agendas of pro-illegal-immigration organizations.” Moran suggests DHS set up a complaint line for agents to register concerns regarding the Obama Administration’s failure to enforce the law.

February 13, 2015:  House Judiciary Chairman Reveals Administration Granting DACA Recipients a Pathway to Citizenship 

House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte sends a letter to Secretary Johnson regarding the Administration’s announcement on a call with Congressional offices that it will permit illegal immigrants to simultaneously apply for both DACA and advance parole. Advance parole allows illegal immigrants to re-enter the United States after leaving the country, at which point they may be eligible to adjust their immigration status and be placed on a pathway to citizenship.

Normalizing Relations with the Houthi are Failing

So when Jen Psaki, the State Department spokesperson said we have asked for our embassy assets to be return, well it does not seem that is going to turn out well. Normalizing relations which started months ago before the coup is also failing.  Even when the United Nations makes an appeal to the Houthi, it is rejected.

Yemen’s Houthis reject U.N. Security Council call to restore order

Yemen’s Iranian-backed Houthi militia on Monday rejected a unanimous appeal from the U.N. Security Council to restore constitutional order in the country after months of chaos, Middle Eastern media reported.

At a special meeting of the 15-member Security Council on Sunday, the diplomats adopted a resolution calling on the Houthis to return control of the government to elected leaders and release President Abdu Rabu Mansour Hadi, who has been under house arrest since Jan. 22.

The six-nation Gulf Cooperation Council also met over the weekend in Riyadh and warned that Yemen’s neighbors would take action themselves if the Shiite militants continue to engage in clashes with other Yemenis and fail to allow government functions to resume.

“Yemen is collapsing before our eyes. We cannot stand by and watch,” U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon warned during a Security Council briefing last week. On Monday, the Houthi rebels refused either to cede power or to release Hadi, the Al-Arabiya news agency reported from Sana, the Yemeni capital.

It quoted a Houthi statement as saying the outside world needed to “respect the will and sovereignty of the Yemeni people, and to be accurate and objective.” The Houthis also reportedly warned the Security Council “not to follow the lead of regional powers that aim tirelessly to eliminate the will of the Yemeni people in a flagrant violation of international conventions that criminalize meddling in internal affairs,” the news agency reported. A U.N. special envoy visited Hadi at his Sana home on Monday to discuss the international efforts to secure his freedom and avert further bloodshed in a country where badly deteriorating security has prompted an exodus of diplomats. Special U.N. advisor Jamal Benomar told Yemen’s Saba News Agency that he assured Hadi that the international community was working for his release. He also urged all parties to Yemen’s turmoil to engage in negotiations to avert a full-scale sectarian war.

“Either the country will descend into civil war and disintegration, or the country will find a way to put the transition back on track,” Benomar was quoted as saying by Sana. “This largely depends on the political will of Yemeni leaders. They all bear responsibility for the current state of affairs, as well as responsibility for finding a way to pull the country from the brink.” Nadia Sakkaf, who was information minister in the government, announced via Twitter on Monday that Hadi needs to travel abroad “immediately” for medical treatment of a heart condition that has been aggravated by his detention.

The Security Council resolution, drafted by Britain and Jordan, “deplored the unilateral actions taken by the Houthis to dissolve parliament and take over Yemen’s government institutions” and reiterated calls for all factions to resolve their disputes through negotiation.

The soaring insecurity prompted the United States, France, Germany, Italy, Britain, Spain, Saudi Arabia, the Netherlands and the United Arab Emirates to close their embassies in Sana earlier this month. On Monday, Turkey and Japan announced that they too were relocating their diplomatic staffs out of the country until order is restored.

Yemen is home to Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, which U.S. security officials consider the most dangerous remnant of the global terror network developed by Osama bin Laden.

Yemen’s location along the narrow passage from the Red Sea into the Gulf of Aden also poses risks to oil shipments from the region if the Shiite militants gain control of the strategic overlooks and attempt to menace exports from Saudi Arabia, the Sunni powerhouse that is Houthi-allied Iran’s arch rival for power in the Muslim world.

*** But also in Yemen is Islamic State and al Qaeda Arabian Peninsula.  Thee is not much room left for the United States.

ISIS gaining ground in Yemen, competing with al Qaeda

The Syria-based terror group ISIS is active and recruiting inside the Middle Eastern state of Yemen, already a hotbed of terrorist activity, CNN has learned.

The disturbing information comes from a Yemeni official, who told CNN on Wednesday that ISIS has a presence in at least three provinces in southern and central Yemen, and there is now a “real competition” between ISIS and the Yemen-based terror group al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, or AQAP.

That competition manifested itself in a gun-battle between the two groups in Yemen’s eastern provinces last month, the same official said, though he did not have specifics on the casualties that resulted from that incident.

CNN cannot independently confirm the claims.

American officials do think ISIS is trying to recruit in Yemen. But one U.S. counter-terror official stressed the view that AQAP remains the dominant force there. The American intelligence view is that while there may be a smattering of ISIS loyalists among Sunni extremists in Yemen, they are likely “mid-level AQAP militants who are sympathetic to ISIL’s vision but haven’t broken ranks.”

According to some experts, ISIS may be seeking a foothold in the Middle East’s poorest country because of its historical importance.

 

IMF Extends $17.5 Billion Credit To Kiev

As the IMF bails our Kiev, the real winner is Russia, GAZPROM wants their money.

No sooner had the International Monetary Fund (IMF) extended $17.5 billion over four years in new credit to Ukraine, Russia’s private gas giant Gazprom was claiming $2.4 billion of it to settle Kiev’s gas debt.

That’s not exactly what the IMF had in mind. The international lender’s mission chief for Ukraine, Nikolay Gueorguiev, issued a statement on Feb. 13 saying the credit was meant to address “immediate macroeconomic stabilization as well as broad and deep structural reforms to provide the basis for strong and sustainable economic growth over the medium term.”

At the same time, Gazprom sent a letter to its Ukrainian counterpart, state-owned Naftogaz, seeking a payment of more than $2.4 billion, to cover $2.2 billion in debt, plus a penalty fee of about $200 million. The debt, which Kiev doesn’t acknowledge, will be the subject of hearings at the Stockholm Arbitration Institute in early 2016.

Discussing Gazprom’s demand on the Russian television station LifeNew, Kremlin Energy Minister Alexander Novak dismissed Ukraine’s stand on the status of the debt, saying, “Gazprom has every right to claim the funds” because the gas deliveries to Naftogaz are listed on invoices according to an active contract between the two gas companies.

So far, Naftogaz has been paying the $2 billion debt in installments. Now that Ukraine has received the IMF loan, Gazprom wants the entire debt paid now.

Ever since the autumn of 2013, when many Ukrainians were demanding closer ties with the European Union at the expense of Russia, its gross domestic product (GDP) has shrunk by about 7 percent, the IMF says. In February 2014, faced with a popular uprising, the country’s president, Viktor Yanukovich, fled to Russia, which responded by annexing Ukraine’s Crimean peninsula.

Since then, the Kremlin has been suspected of providing weapons and even personnel to pro-Russian separatists fighting to create their own state in eastern Ukraine. The EU and the United States responded with economic sanctions that have, along with low oil prices, damaged Russia’s economy as well. Russia’s GDP is expected to contract by between 3 percent and 5 percent in 2015.

Then there is Saudi Arabia

A network of gas pipeline in cities is the only viable solution to the cooking gas crisis that happened in Jeddah recently, according to Victor Zubkov, chairman of the board of directors of Gazprom in Russia.
In an exclusive interview, Zubkov, who is also the Russian president’s special representative for cooperation with Gas Exporting Countries Forum, told Arab News after his meeting with the Ministry of Oil that the price is expected to be higher than its current price. He said: “I cannot disclose the rate right now but it will be reasonable.”
To overcome the cooking gas problem in Jeddah, there is a need to build gas pipelines’ network in place of cylinders, which have become outdated. “A better way is to build network in order to supply much accessible gas available at their homes and accommodation,” he said.
The top Russian official was in the capital last Tuesday to address the International Energy Forum (IEF) at its headquarters in the Kingdom. He also had a meeting with the Ministry of Oil.
He said 90 percent of the people in Russia use the gasification network. With the pipeline network, gas will come directly to apartments and houses requiring the people to pay only the monthly gas bill.
Zubkov said Russia and Saudi Arabia need more cooperation not only in the energy sector but also the agricultural one. “While there are big efforts for water desalination here and such water has no use for agriculture, Russia can supply wheat and many other agricultural products. In this case Saudi Arabia can invest in Russia’s farm sector and get quality products.”
“Saudi people, especially businessmen, need sufficient knowledge about Russia. As such, we need to have many meetings and, maybe, hold a business forum as well. Russia is a stable and dependable partner. Of course, we guarantee that we will implement all our proposals,” he added.
During his meeting with Saudi officials, Zubkov briefed them on opportunities in Russia’s energy sector as well as on their short- and long-range plans that include stability and sustainable supply for the European market and the Asian Pacific market as well.


“Of course, we are all concerned about oil price as it affects us all because many of our long-term contracts are connected with the oil price. We want the price to be higher than what it is now,” he said.
Zubkov added: “It is not only because our budgeting is based on the oil price but also because a lot of investment plans are now doubtful not only inside Russia but also in different countries as well. The negative impact on this will be felt by consumers as they outnumber the producers by over 10 times.”
According to him, the price should not be either too low or too high. It should reflect the situation in producing and transporting expenses. It should be stable in the interest of economy and, of course, to also avoid creating social unrest.
“Our message to the Saudi government is price should be higher than the current level. And, of course, I will not disclose here the new figure that we have discussed,” he said.

 

Sinai and Libya models for the Islamic State’s expansion

This post is part of the “Islamist Politics in the Shadow of the Islamic State” symposium.

The Islamic State announced several months ago that it was “annexing” territory in Algeria (Wilayat al-Jazair), Libya (Wilayat al-Barqah, Wilayat al-Tarabulus and Wilayat al-Fizan), Sinai (Wilayat Sinai), Saudi Arabia (Wilayat al-Haramayn) and Yemen (Wilayat al-Yaman). It is likely that the Islamic State plans to pursue a similar approach in Afghanistan and Pakistan following its announcement of accepting pledges of allegiance from former members of the Afghan and Pakistan Taliban to also try and “annex” territory there under the framework of a new wilayah called “Wilayat Khorasan.” On its face, this bold declaration of an expanding number of wilayat (provinces) resembles the announcements by al-Qaeda of creating numerous franchises in the mid-2000s. The Islamic State’s “wilayat” strategy differs in significant ways from al-Qaeda’s “franchise” strategy, however.

The academic literature has shed great light on the al-Qaeda franchising strategy. In a recent article Daniel Byman highlights a number of key factors within the al-Qaeda network regarding motivations for affiliation and franchising. Typically, affiliates joined up with al-Qaeda as a result of failure. Affiliation helped with financial support; offered a potential haven that could be exploited, along with access to new training, recruiting, publicity and military expertise; gave branding and publicity; and opened up personal networks from past foreign fighter mobilizations. It in turn helps al-Qaeda with mission fulfillment, remaining relevant, providing access to new logistics networks, and building a new group of hardened fighters.

But, Byman argues, those franchises often became as much a burden as an asset as local interests and views diverged with those of the parent organization. Leah Farrall argues that al-Qaeda increasingly came to view franchising “warily” in part due to its inability to always control its new partners such as Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and al-Qaeda in Iraq as well as because of backlash from unsuccessful cooptation of organizations such as the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group or Egyptian Islamic Jihad. This is one of the reasons why, prior to Osama bin Laden’s death, the Somali jihadi group Harakat al-Shabab al-Mujahideen was not given franchise status. Bin Laden had apprehensions about the group’s utility due to past clan infighting and lack of unity. Following the death of bin Laden though, his replacement, Ayman al-Zawahiri, brought Shabab into the fold, but the results have been quite disastrous; Shabab has declined and also was in an internal feud between its foreign and local members. Will the Islamic State’s wilayat pose a similar burden?

There is one key difference between al-Qaeda’s and the Islamic State’s model for expansion. Al-Qaeda wanted to use its new franchises in service of its main priority: attacking Western countries to force them to stop supporting “apostate” Arab regimes, which without the support of Western countries would then be ripe for the taking. This has only truly worked out with its Yemeni branch, al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP). On the other hand, while the Islamic State does not have an issue with its supporters or grassroots activists attacking Western countries, its main priority is building out its caliphate, which is evident in its famous slogan baqiya wa tatamaddad (remaining and expanding). As a result, it has had a relatively clear agenda and model: fighting locally, instituting limited governance and conducting outreach. This differs from al-Qaeda’s more muddled approach – it hoped a local franchise would conduct external operations, but many times franchises would instead focus on local battles or attempts at governance without a clear plan, as bin Laden had warned. Moreover, the Islamic State has had a simple media strategy for telegraphing what it is doing on the ground to show its supporters, potential recruits and enemies that it is in fact doing something. This accomplishes more, even if it appears that the Islamic State is doing more than it actually is, in comparison with al-Qaeda’s practice of waiting for a successful external operation to succeed and then claiming responsibility after the fact.

How is this strategy working? So far, Libya and the Sinai appear to be the locations with the most promise, though the Islamic State’s presence in these areas should not be overstated. It certainly does not command the amount of territorial control as its base in Mesopotamia. That said, the Islamic State’s wilayat in Libya and the Sinai are following the same methodology on the ground and in the media as the Islamic State’s wilayat have in Iraq and Syria.

By contrast, its wilayat in Algeria, Saudi Arabia and Yemen have yet to show any signs of activity. It is certainly possible that the Islamic State is playing a long game and preparing its soldiers and bureaucrats for future jihad, governance and dawa (propagation of Islam), but there are reasons to be skeptical as well. Following Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s announcement of the expansion of the Islamic State in mid-November, its media apparatus took over the media departments of all the local wilayat outside of Mesopotamia. This highlights that, at least on the media level, the Islamic State is in full command and control.

In Algeria, there were some signs of action that have since petered off. The leader of Wilayat al-Jazair, Abd al-Malik Guri (Khalid Abu Sulayman) was killed by the Algerian military on Dec. 22. Further, while northern Algerian-based jihadis have certainly conducted attacks over the years, they have had a difficult time operating or conducting sustainable campaigns that have resulted in gaining territory. Moreover, there have been no signs that Wilayat al-Jazair has conducted any military operations since it beheaded the French tourist Hervé Gourdel on Sept. 24, which was prior to the Islamic State accepting the group into the fold. It has also not been involved in any type of governance or dawa activities.

There have also not been any formal military or governance activities carried out by the Islamic State’s wilayat in Saudi Arabia or Yemen. The Saudi government claims the Islamic State was involved in an attack that killed several Shiites in al-Ahsa on Nov. 3 and Islamic State supporters claimed responsibility for an attempted assassination of a Danish businessman through a drive-by shooting on a highway in Riyadh on Nov. 22. The Saudis have a history of dealing with insurgency against al-Qaeda on its territory from 2002-06 so are ready for any fight if the Islamic State attempts to start a campaign there.

As for Yemen, AQAP is the strongest jihadi presence and took major issue with Baghdadi’s announcement of creating a wilayah in Yemen. On Nov. 19, AQAP’s top sharia official, Harith al-Nazari, released a video rejecting the Islamic State’s claims and calling for the dissolution of all groups so as to pledge baya (religiously binding oath of allegiance), stating: “We reject the call to split the ranks of the mujahid groups” and “export[ing] the fighting and discord [in Syria] to other fronts.” As a result, although there are indeed some supporters of the Islamic State in Yemen, they have yet to show any sign of activity. It is possible that the jihadi dynamics in Yemen might change after the Houthi coup, but unless the Islamic State is able to take the reins of the AQAP apparatus from the inside, it has an uphill battle due to AQAP’s roots going back a decade. Therefore, it is unclear how the Islamic State hopes and plans to operate in those environments.

This leaves the Sinai and Libya as the primary models for the Islamic State’s expansion. In the first six weeks since Baghdadi’s announcement, it appeared that the Islamic State in Sinai was continuing to operate in a similar manner to how its predecessor in name Jamaat Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis was acting by conducting attacks against the Egyptian military as well as gas pipelines. Since the beginning of 2015, there have been small signs of an expanded program including elements of Islamic State governance present elsewhere. For example, on Jan. 2, Wilayat Sinai burned marijuana after detaining drug traffickers and on Jan. 7 it distributed funds to residents of Rafah after the Egyptian military demolished their homes to create a buffer zone near the border with Gaza.

On top of these inchoate steps, similar to the promotion of Syria and Iraq as lands of opportunity for locals and locations for foreign fighters, the Islamic State has pushed similar narratives regarding the Sinai. When Baghdadi made his November announcement he stated that “we ask every individual amongst them to join the closest wilayah to him, and to hear and obey the wali [governor] appointed by us for it.” This further push illustrates the seriousness of this endeavor for the Islamic State. First, on Dec. 1, its semi-official media agencies al-Battar and al-Jabhah al-Ialamiyyah released the pamphlet “Come to the Sinai to Elevate the Foundations of Your State,” by Abu Musab al-Gharib, which echoes Baghdadi’s call. Further, on Jan. 16 the Islamic State’s official anashid (religiously-sanctioned a capella music) and Quranic recitation outlet Ajnad released a nashid titled “The Land of Sinai,” exhorting fighters and wannabe recruits to go forth. The Islamic State also has highlighted how it has scuttled gas deals, killed spies and built a foundation for tawhid(pure monotheism). Most recently, on Jan. 21, it released an ideological video, but it was not a stern lecture like those posted by al-Qaeda-styled groups. The video showed individuals in Wilayat Sinai hanging out together around a campfire, showing the life of a mujahid and the camaraderie involved, imbuing a particular ascetic for future members who join up.

Moving west, the Islamic State’s activities and operations are even more sophisticated and closer to how it operates in Syria and Iraq, though on a smaller scale. Libya has the most potential to replicate the Islamic State’s model in Mesopotamia if things go right for it. Majlis Shura Shabab al-Islam, based in Derna and the named used prior to the Islamic State’s formal acceptance of its baya, was already involved in a variety of military, governance and dawa activities. Though in reality it only truly controls some neighborhoods in Derna, the activities have only increased and the Islamic State now also operates in Benghazi, Sirte, and Tripoli, and has created the self-styled Wilayat al-Barqah in the east, Wilayat al-Tarabulus in the west, and Wilayat al-Fizan in the south. There are also some signs that the Islamic State has siphoned off some of Ansar al-Sharia in Libya’s members, which could help accelerate its rise similar to how the Islamic State absorbed defecting Jabhat al-Nusra members in Syria.

Beyond the military fighting the Islamic State is doing in Derna and Benghazi, as well as its military parades in Sirte and an attack in Wilayat al-Fizan, it has also claimed to have executed two Tunisian journalists (though this has since been disputed by Tunisia’s ambassador in Libya), kidnapped 21 Christian Egyptians, and conducted an attack on the Corinthia Hotel in Tripoli. In terms of governance types of activities, the Islamic State in Libya has primarily only focused on cultural symbolism. For example, it has conducted a number of hisbah (accountability) patrols in markets in Derna and Sirte making sure they are sharia-compliant and are not selling rotten or spoiled food, taking away stores selling hookahs since they view smoking tobacco as against Islam, and telling stores to stop selling their products when it is time for daily prayers. The Islamic State in Libya has also conducted some dawa activities, the largest was the forum “The Caliphate Upon the Manhaj [methodology] of the Prophet” on Nov. 25. It has also provided aid to the poor and needy and given gifts and sweets to children in Benghazi. The Islamic State now is attempting to impose regulations on locals within the health industry, specifically those in pharmacies.

On top of this, unlike the other wilayat there are clear signs that there is a foreign fighter presence in Libya. This is not to the same extent as in Syria or Iraq, but the fact that there are foreigners there illustrates the theaters appeal. Although the Islamic State’s official presence in Libya did not begin until November, jihadi foreign fighters have been coming into Libya since 2012 when Algerians from al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb began to make it another base of operations and a safe haven. There have also been a number of foreigners that have been members of Ansar al-Sharia in Libya in part due to the relationship and connections with its sister organization in Tunisia as well as its training for individuals to go fight abroad in Syria.

Most confirmed foreign fighters have come from surrounding countries to Libya, such as Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Egypt and Sudan. Though there have also been cases of Saudi and Yemeni foreign fighters, as well as rumors of Palestinians and Syrians. It is difficult to know the total number of foreign fighters since some have left for other fights in Syria or the Sinai after receiving training or returned home to carry out attacks in Egypt or Tunisia. It is believed though that Tunisians make up the highest percentage of foreign fighters in Libya and that up to 20 percent of the jihadi fighters in Libya are of foreign origin.

Another sign of the importance and emphasis the Islamic State is placing on foreign fighter involvement in Libya is that its official media apparatus is beginning to announce martyrdom notices, as it has done in Iraq and Syria. Since it began two weeks ago, it has announced 10 cases, including six Tunisians, two Egyptians, one Saudi and one Sudanese all who died in the battles of Benghazi. Further, to encourage more emigration, the Islamic State released a story about how one Saudi fighter, Abd al-Hamid al-Qasimi, traveled to Libya to embark on the building of the “caliphate” in Wilayat Tarabulus. More importantly, and in line with the Islamic State’s media methodologies in Mesopotamia, it released a video message on Jan. 20 from two ethnic-Tuareg members of the Islamic State in Wilayat Tarbulus calling for individuals and jihadis in Azawad (a term used by some locals as a name for northern Mali) to pledge baya to Baghdadi and make hijrah (emigration) to the Islamic State in Libya. One of the men, Abu Umar al-Tawrigi, stated: “I call my Tuareg brothers to migrate to the Islamic State and that they give baya to emir al-muminin [leader of the faithful] Abu Bakr Al- Baghdadi.” Dozens of similar videos have come from the Islamic State’s foreign fighters based in Syria, from Bosnians to Canadians to French to Indonesians to Moldovans, among others that have produced videos in a similar vein.

The Islamic State does therefore seem to be attempting to follow the same tactics and strategies on the ground in Libya (and to a lesser extent in the Sinai) as it has already done in Iraq and Syria. There is still a long way to go before either is consolidated in terms of territorial control or full monopoly on governance and security. Libya has the highest likelihood of success since there is no state, though there are limitations too since there is a multi-polar devolution of a variety of armed actors. The Islamic State will likely have more problems in the Sinai since the actors are stuck between two strong military states in Egypt and Israel as well as a Hamas-led Gaza government that fears the jihadis’ threat to its legitimacy. That said, if the Egyptian government continues to operate in a brazen manner militarily it will create new local recruits that could sustain the Islamic State in north Sinai. How this all ends is impossible to predict, but as of now, the Islamic State has indeed set itself up on a limited base in the Sinai and has established a growing movement in Libya more than two months following the announcement of its expansion.

Aaron Y. Zelin is a PhD candidate at King’s College London. He is the Richard Borow Fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and the Rena and Sami David Fellow at the International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation and Political Violence.