You Pay TSA Fees, What Does the Govt do with Them?

(We should be asking the same question for all the other fees we pay like on our cell phone bills, cable bills or power bills)

Security Fee Chart TSA website

Billions in TSA 9/11 Security Fees Diverted by Congress for Other Causes

Money to sustain the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) continuously flowed into the government’s coffers via a special security fee collected from every passenger, yet Congress didn’t release the funds during the shutdown. Known as the September 11 Security Fee, air carriers collect $5.60 per one-way trip and $11.20 round trip to help fund the TSA. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) reports an average daily air passenger flow of 2.6 million, which translates into $14.5 million per day in TSA fees. That amounts to more than $507 million collected during the 35-day government shutdown yet the agency’s 51,000 employees didn’t get paid, igniting an onslaught of hardship stories in the media. What happened to the money? Why didn’t Congress release it even though House Speaker Nancy Pelosi claims “Our nation’s leaders have no greater responsibility than ensuring the safety and security of the American people.”

The truth is Congress has for years diverted billions of dollars in September 11 Security Fees and used the money for other causes not related to air security. This predates the recent government shutdown and indicates where the “safety and security of the American people” sits on the congressional list of priorities. In 2001 the TSA fee was $2.50 per passenger, but Congress increased it to the current $5.60 in 2013 and restructured the payment plan so that around $13 billion of the TSA fees would go to “deficit reduction” and other government sectors. Under the revamp, created by the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013, the revenue collected from passengers gets deposited in the general fund of the U.S. Treasury and a chunk of the money is used for other matters. The original statute enacted after the worst terrorist attack on American soil specifically required that the revenue from the passenger security fee be dedicated to providing civil aviation security services. The Budget Act amended it to require that a portion of money, $12.63 billion generated over 10 years, is deposited in the general fund as “offsetting receipts for the Federal budget.”

Redirecting passenger security fees naturally caused a ruckus in the airline industry, which has repeatedly demanded that Congress stop the practice. Using the TSA’s budget for functions not related to aviation security has caused a multitude of problems, including excessive screening lines and a failure to align TSA staff and equipment with passenger volumes by location, according to the industry’s trade organization, Airlines for America (A4A). In a letter to a U.S. Senator, the group’s president writes that if Congress wants to take constructive and well-justified action, it would immediately put the diverted billions, paid by airline passengers, where it belongs. In Congressional testimony last summer, the group’s senior vice president revealed that in 2017 alone special taxes on airlines and their customers totaled over $24 billion—more than $66 million per day. “Stop the annual practice of diverting passenger security fee revenue,” the airline official, Sharon Pinkerton, told the House Homeland Security Committee.

If the TSA, created after the 2001 terrorist attacks, were properly funded perhaps it would be better equipped to meet its critical mission or handle unexpected events such as a government shutdown. The agency is charged with securing transportation by adequately screening luggage, passengers and properly vetting foreign flight students. Instead, it is best known for its shameful security lapses and efforts to cover them up. For nearly a decade Judicial Watch has reported extensively—and uncovered records—involving the TSA’s serious transgressions and failure to adequately fulfill its mission. This includes missing guns and bombs during covert exercises known as “red team tests,” TSA agents literally sleeping on the job and stealing from passengers, the failure to properly screen luggage and a number of other violations that have risked the nation’s safety. Records obtained by Judicial Watch a few years ago show hundreds of badges that allow agents to access secure areas of airports went missing along with uniforms and other devices used to control entry. Just a few months ago, a bipartisan congressional investigation found that persistent misconduct by TSA managers often goes unpunished and whistleblowers who report it as well as airport safety risks are penalized by senior officials.

 

USA Trade Deal with China Pivots on Huawei

Could it be that the Trump administration has the ace-in-the-hole when it comes to forcing the hand of China? Could it be that China is finally caught due to Huawei?

How Meng Wanzhou’s ‘P’ passport works | The Star

There is a 13-count indictment against the Chinese telecommunications giant Huawei Technologies, alleging the company took part in a long-running scheme in which it deceived the U.S. government about its business dealings with Iran.

Could it be that European countries that are pressing to stay in the JCPOA deal with Iran could eventually be implicated as well?

Huawei-et-al.-Press-Release-(1)

BROOKLYN, N.Y. – A 13-count indictment was unsealed earlier today in federal
court in Brooklyn, New York, charging four defendants, all of whom are affiliated with
Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. (Huawei), the world’s largest telecommunications equipment
manufacturer, with headquarters in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and operations
around the world. The indicted defendants include Huawei and two Huawei subsidiaries
Huawei Device USA Inc. (Huawei USA) and Skycom Tech Co. Ltd. (Skycom) —
as well as Huawei’s Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Wanzhou Meng (Meng).
The defendants Huawei and Skycom are charged with bank fraud and conspiracy
to commit bank fraud, wire fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud, conspiracy to
defraud the United States, conspiracy to violate and substantive violations of the
International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), and conspiracy to commit
money laundering. Huawei and Huawei USA are charged with conspiracy to obstruct
justice related to the Grand Jury investigation in the Eastern District of New York. Meng
is charged with bank fraud, wire fraud, and conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud.
“As charged in the indictment, Huawei and its subsidiaries, with the direct and
personal involvement of their executives, engaged in serious fraudulent conduct,
including conspiracy, bank fraud, wire fraud, sanctions violations, money laundering and
the orchestrated obstruction of justice,” stated United States Attorney Donoghue. “For
over a decade, Huawei employed a strategy of lies and deceit to conduct and grow its
business. This Office will continue to hold accountable companies and their executives,
whether here or abroad, that commit fraud against U.S. financial institutions and their
international counterparts and violate U.S. laws designed to maintain our national
security.” Mr. Donoghue thanked the FBI, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations, U.S. Department of Commerce Office of Export Enforcement and the Defense Criminal Investigative Service agents who are
investigating this case for their tireless work and dedication.
“These charges lay bare Huawei’s blatant disregard for the laws of our country
and standard global business practices,” stated FBI Director Wray.
“Companies like Huawei pose a dual threat to both our economic and national security, and the magnitude of these charges make clear just how seriously the FBI takes this threat. Today should serve as a warning that we will not tolerate businesses that violate our laws, obstruct justice, or jeopardize national and economic well-being.”
“As charged in the indictment, Huawei and its Chief Financial Officer broke U.S.
law and have engaged in a fraudulent financial scheme that is detrimental to the security
of the United States,” stated U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Nielsen.
“They willfully conducted millions of dollars in transactions that were in direct violation
of the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations, and such behavior will not be
tolerated. The Department of Homeland Security is focused on preventing nefarious
actors from accessing or manipulating our financial system, and we will ensure that
legitimate economic activity is not exploited by our adversaries. I would like to thank
ICE Homeland Security Investigations for their exceptional work on this case.”
“For years, Chinese firms have broken our export laws and undermined sanctions,
often using the U.S. financial systems to facilitate their illegal activities,” stated U.S.
Department of Commerce Secretary Ross.
Do you kinda wonder as I do how long this was going on actually and what did the Obama Justice Department do?    NUTTIN  it seems.
***

(Reuters) – Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou, who was arrested in Canada and faces possible extradition to the United States, is exploring a defense that claims U.S. charges against her are politically motivated, the Globe and Mail newspaper reported on Monday.

Meng, the chief financial officer of China’s Huawei Technologies Co Ltd, is the central figure in a high-stakes dispute between the United States and China. Canada arrested Meng in December at the request of the United States and last month she was charged with wire fraud that violated U.S. sanctions on Iran.

“The political overlay of this case is remarkable,” Richard Peck, lead counsel for Meng, told the Toronto newspaper in a telephone interview.

“That’s probably the one thing that sets it apart from any other extradition case I’ve ever seen. It’s got this cloud of politicization hanging over it,” Peck added.